I am informed by the blessedly self-correcting internet that 303 Creative didn't even create websites. So we have a woman claiming that she has a First Amendment right to refuse services she doesn't provide to a couple that doesn't exist.
This case is the Dred Scott of absurdity.
Alito and Thomas just invent cases to drive their bigoted decisions, no doubt funded by dark money. The man named in the 303 case never asked for a website, and heโs straight and married to a woman. This court has a legitimacy crisis. https://t.co/KVjMmFIGCf
@RepNancyMace@PeteButtigieg Youโre busy taking credit for investments you voted against so maybe worry about hypocrisy instead of being snarky about Pete to misdirect.
@RonFilipkowski In the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in United States v. Lovett (1946), the Court held that, under these circumstances, the Act was no "mere appropriation measure", but was effectively a bill of attainder prohibited by Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution. (WP)
Fascism tactics 101 -
1.Erode the citizens trust in the media that tells the stories.
2.Create distrust in law enforcement that investigates
their crimes.
3.Create distrust in elections that vote against them.
Republicans have that trifecta going on.