why making decisions based on a single crypto personality is a disaster, 101:
i think ben cowen is probably the most thoughtful large-following crypto youtube figure, which makes this example especially poignant (you could do far worse in terms of isolated siloes of information)
in this video, he sets up a dynamic DCA strategy where he purportedly buys below a certain level, and sells above, and makes strong claims about this system
all v reasonable, until you see that, if he followed his own system (DCAing out above his system's .6 risk level), he would've barely sold anything the past 3 years (and what was sold would've happened at 60-70k back in 2024), and essentially done a near-total round trip on BTC
not intended to be some sort of callout, but just a pretty acute reminder of how everything needs to be looked at in confluence with other sources
BREAKING: Pakistan's Prime Minister announces that the US and Iran have officially reached a peace deal and the official signing will take place on June 19th in Switzerland.
"Both sides have declared the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon," he says.
25 year old Brandon Hong traded from ZERO to Hundreds of Millions with a simple 4 part system
@brandank_cr lays out how any trader can reliably beat the market and compound their way to Generational Wealth
He's also a prolific early stage investor, buying into the leading AI and Robotics labs before the hype train
This is a masterclass in market psychology and exposing yourself to trends in ANY MARKET
1:35 – Macro View & Why $SPCX will disappoint
7:20 – From meme coins to a repeatable trading system
9:27 – The framework behind Brandon's trades
12:37 – Why Brandon thinks crypto has changed forever
14:19 – Michael Saylor's biggest Bitcoin risk
23:04 – Why charts matter more than narratives
25:45 – The mindset shift that changed Brandon's trading
31:11 - You have to be Asset Agnostic
33:10 – Buy the rumor, sell the news
39:44 – Why all-time highs are bullish
44:22 – Why capital is leaving crypto
46:45 – The opportunity Brandon sees in private markets
49:52 – The easiest way to build wealth in private markets
52:22 – Why money isn't Brandon's biggest motivator
57:48 – How Brandon would start over from scratch
1:03:37 – Final thoughts
its almost crazy to realize and maybe its too dystopian of a view, but as a meta shareholder, dont the ppl working there legally have to generate as much profit as possible for me?
and how else would they do that other than absolutely cook people? lmeow
ct glorifies perps and meme coins as the most efficient path to wealth. i disagree.
the best way to get rich in crypto is boring: have a job, pour savings in, buy spot in bear markets, sell in euphoria. repeat for 2-3 cycles over 5-10 years.
that's what i did. it's not sexy. it's not fast. but it works.
you don't get wiped on leverage. you don't lose everything on a rug. you just buy "good" coins cheap, hold them, and sell when everyone loses their minds in euphoria.
often times the people who make it in crypto aren't the best traders. they're the ones who survive long enough for a bull market to reward their patience.
The risk/reward of putting your capital in crypto has never looked worse.
Not only are returns getting compressed, but AI is massively increasing the attack surface for hacks.
Crypto is no longer the best place on the internet to achieve financial freedom.
Inside you there are two people. The high IQ individual who simply longs $HYPE dips and the zero IQ individual who's been longing $BTC all week and continues to do so.
MSTR Summary (As I understand it)
The market basically has an extremely large overhang of a potential BTC seller. Now MSTR has been a big reason why rallies at highs have always continued on longer than it should - it is an essential indicator to track for the health of the bull market - early stage bull = MSTR buys usually was sustained continuous bullish momentum ; late stage bull = MSTR buys would hold price up, before a nuke after the announcement that Saylor has been buying
Now this is potentially unravelling, essentially because the day of reckoning has come - after all, when someone buys, one must ask - how does he get the capital to buy? Saylor has historically funded it through equity financing / convertible notes / term loans / and more recently, preferred equity product financing - and I'll try to explain it simply as how I understand it.
Now for most of the time, equity financing was actually a very sustainable ponzi. Equity had no guarantee of returns. That is a good thing. Of course, this all came at the expense of MSTR shareholders, but the idea that I believe Saylor had, was that "we are selling the stock, to buy something that has more convexity than the stock (BTC), so that, in 10 years, we will end up with a lot more money, and so the stock will be a lot higher" - i.e you're trading short term PA for long term CAGR
This of course assumes a lot of things - 1) that BTC will be higher in 10 years, 2) that BTC has some sort of CAGR, and 3) that stock price will reflect this, and 4) that people will buy the story, and 5) that the market will like it, will reward it (and it has, for the past 4 years)
Now, all's well. This is where we get to the trouble - Saylor launched a bunch of new products recently - STRC / STRD / etc. I'm not an expert in these products, so feel free to correct me where I'm wrong, but these are preferred shares that pay yield. They say: Hey, give me cash. I'll give you yield. This yield varies in order to keep the product at par value ; i.e If today it goes to 90, the yield increases to get people to "buy" it so as to "peg" it there;
I'm not going to go through each product - they all work slightly differently. The rest are fixed yield instead of variable; All you have to understand is at this point, MSTR now began giving out money (i.e having yield)
This is a bad thing and where the story is now. Having obligations means having to spend cash to pay yield, which means, in a company that hinges on an assumption of the 15% CAGR of a magical internet asset with no real cashflows ( other than software biz) - where is the money coming from?
The way I see it, you basically have an extremely huge cloud looming on the horizon. You don't know when the hurricane will start, but you see it. This is enough to prevent BTC from reaching new highs in the first place - it is possible to kick the can down the road, to "look away from the hurricane", but the hurricane is there all the same, just waiting for its reckoning.
He holds $53 BILLION in Bitcoin (Based on Price of 63k), yet only has enough cash for 6 months of dividend coverage (numbers are from https://t.co/Dn0HtZunrC). And back in February they claimed a $2.25 Billion reserve - this reserve has been drawn hard (now it's 900M)
Saylor has 3 ways out. And again - this is just my analysis - I could be missing something:
1. Stop the yield. He can theoretically (since these are all preferreds, correct me if I'm wrong) just stop payments.
2. Somehow finance more $ to pay dividends, either by selling more MSTR, or raising debt.
3. Sell BTC to pay his bills
Now, obviously, the second-order effects of all of these are incredibly bad no matter how you see it.
For 1) if he does that, faith in MSTR would collapse, stock prices would probably go down, STRC goes to Mordor, and maybe he doesn't have to sell BTC, but there are still obligations to pay, so it doesn't fully solve the issue. The thing is - stop paying STRC can be done, but it's like putting a bandaid when your arm gets cut off.
Because what happens here is that (and this is where I'm relying on Claude, who read the offering doc) - he stops the cash from going out, but the obligation still exists - i.e He can stop the payment, but he can't cancel the debt. It's like your landlord coming to you for this month's rent, and you defer it to next month - but you now have to pay two months' worth of rent next month, not just a month's rent
STRC is cumulative - so stopping = you don't pay cash now, but the amount you skipped gets added to a tab and grows. And because STRC is a "Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock" with perpetual being the key word here, there is no maturity date, it doesn't end, and the only true way to stop it is by buying it back with cash. Else, the dividend just keeps compounding at the back.
Buying back is an option, and according to Claude, the cash redemption price is $101 per share - so $8 Bn if he wanted the whole STRC stack gone. But that's where we come back to the above - he doesn't have the cash!
For 2) It's like rolling your credit card bill. This months bill comes in - you take a new credit card, use it to pay your old one, and for the next month, you're chilling, and you extend the runway. Now if BTC magically goes up to 200k, then you are safe, you can pay your obligations, selling some BTC won't matter.
For 3) This is the worst case scenario. I mean, this is just a doom loop. On 1st June, MSTR already filed a sale of 32 BTC (2.5m), the first strategic / material sale in history. The other sale was in 2022, and that was a tax-loss sale which they bought back immediately. BTC instantly went down by 6-7% on the day, and it's down 12% since then. If they sell more, BTC is just going to go down faster than they would get $ back from selling, and they're basically left holding the bag.
My analysis:
For now, the markets will probably stay at a standstill until this is resolved. Everyone is watching to see what Saylor will do. Again, he owns roughly 4% of all BTC. And what happens if BTC keeps going down? That would be a doom loop playing out. And putting yourself into the mindset of a buyer - why would I buy BTC here, when I know there is a potential seller coming here tomorrow?
I'm reminded of an old joke in the office that our head of trading used to say, that originated on wall street:
A trader thinks that the prices of eggs are going to increase, and so he contacts his broker and asks him to buy 1,000,000 egg futures at $1.70
Sure enough, a week later, the price of egg futures is $2.50, and the trader, happy to ride his winners, places an order for 3,000,000 more egg futures
Next month, at $4.30 a piece, he pats himself on the back and restructures his liquid investments to buy another 10,000,000 egg futures
At the end of the quarter, egg futures are trading at $7, and the trader finally calls up his broker and tells him to sell them all
The broker replies: “To who? You’re the egg man!”
PSA: This is a personal opinion piece written in my individual capacity, not on behalf of or attributable to my employer. It is not investment research, a recommendation, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security or asset.
It does not constitute financial advice and should not be relied upon for any investment decision; readers should do their own research and consult their own advisors. All views are my own as of the date of writing and may change without notice. Factual claims are drawn from public sources and may contain errors or become outdated.
I hold no position, long or short, in BTC, MSTR, or any related security, and have no economic interest in the price of any asset discussed. I receive no compensation from any party in connection with this piece.
after i sold last cycle, i forced myself to stop looking at crypto entirely. couldn't bear to see if i'd sold early and left millions more on the table.
i had been in pure fight or flight mode for over a year.
when it was finally over, i just... stopped. watched youtube. picked my kids up from school. walked a lot.
for months.
but my hunger returned last fall and i decided i've got one more cycle in me.
lets make it count