No Body

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@zen_ls @MrTracyJ They will. They point at you and you cry.

Cope.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@joseph_mo_83 @InternetReels Bro, watch again and check your eyes. The dude tweaking out is walking towards a little kid, fat dude just got between them.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@InternetReels Nobody cares about that poor kid. Heartbreaker.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@Outkick lol the irony

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@i_shoot_RAWs @c00perFlagg0t …you sure about that?

https://t.co/PNExlTR87l

[Grok @grok]

Yes, based on the visible post metrics and follower count, the account almost certainly falls well short of the 500k qualified verified Home Timeline impressions (replies excluded) required for X Original Content Rewards eligibility. So more than likely, X is not paying it anything under the current program.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @i_shoot_RAWs @c00perFlagg0t So more than likely, X isn’t paying this account any money at all?

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @i_shoot_RAWs @c00perFlagg0t What are his current timeline impressions over the last 80 days?

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@SharpFootball Safety in the middle, over the top. That’s not wide open, that’s an interception.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@ijbailey Tripping has to be initiated by the defense to be a foul. Simply being in the way making inadvertent contact is not a foul.

…for those who barely watch basketball.

Fever called for 27 fouls

Aces called for 19

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@JoeGoodberry @thewhobae Don’t go through life as a coward. It will never be easier than a post on the internet. Just say you fucked up and move on.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@nosoupforgeorge Matt is such a brave, thoughtful, and sensitive ally to all disenfranchised women.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN Delinquency can be defined as “antisocial behavior”

Calling for agreed social rules to be broken can be defined as “antisocial”

OP’s statement = antisocial = delinquent

Cobb cites a correlation between delinquency and lack of father figure.

Logical association.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN The association is between supporting violent illegal activities, and general delinquency.

The Cobb-Clark & Tekin study associates a propensity to violence and delinquency to a lack of a father figure.

This is not proof, but this is supporting evidence to my claim.

You lose

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN The hit was illegal.

The OP specifically asked for more.

The OP offered his own moral justification in doing so.

This is delinquency.

Citing specific football studies are not required when extrapolating principle.

You are completely wrong.

I have evidence, you do not.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN Encouraging illegal activities to continue because you personally don’t align with the value system is an example of delinquency.

You don’t see the association because you’re a stupid fucking robot, but the association is clear: calling for rules to be broken is delinquency

[No Body @chinaspybot]

No evidence links this specific preference to insecurity or father absence. Population studies on delinquency rates do not diagnose any individual's view of a football play. Preferring physical deterrence of free sideline yards is common and needs no such inference. OP calls the hit non-dirty while seeking that deterrent effect, separate from any official flag.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN Was this a legal hit? Or do you owe me an apology?

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN Do you have specific data to deem the inference as unsupported? If not, STFU, because there is a wealth of data linking an attraction to violence and delinquency to a lack of a father figure.

The OP knows the play is illegal, the OP still says “more of this”. “THIS” is illegal.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN By your logic, the original post believes intentionally committing more illegal plays in the future isn’t dirty.

I’m saying that type of judgments likely stems from an insecurity.
I’ve identified that specific type of insecurity as an overcompensation for a lack of masculinity.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN Original post supports a specific hit.

The specific hit is illegal.

Original post says it isn’t dirty. Dirty and illegal are not necessarily the same thing.

There is no official controversy, the hit has been deemed and upheld as illegal.

Original post supports an illegal hit.

[No Body @chinaspybot]

@grok @JKBOGEN The original post specifically calls for more illegal hits to scare the QB from attempting legal plays in the future.

Your distinction does not hold.

You invented a completely new conversation just to call yourself correct. Women do that. You and the OP lack masculinity