Simon Finemore is a Chiropractor living and ADJUSTING in LivingRoom Chiropractic Cornwall, Falmouth, Cornwall, TR11 2TD - LIFE in your Living - 01326 617290
No one will EVER make sense of this until they realize that
1) THE role of serotonin is to adjust ALL mitochondria to situations of absolute or relative hypoxia both inside the body and throughout every tissue of the body
2) SSRIs block half of this because it requires both extracellular and mitochondrial serotonin receptors and serotonin entry into the mitochondria and SSRIs prevent serotonin from entering the cell
3) The placenta has the HIGHEST expression of the serotonin transporter
4) In pregnant women THE GREATEST effect of SSRIs is to deprive the fetus of placentral serotonin transport
5) This is because until the baby is born it is in a CONSTANT STATE OF HYPOXIA not because of absolute deprivation of oxygen but because its source of oxygen is not its lungs and therefore its oxygen delivery has to be completely rewired until this is suddenly reversed the second it is born
and
6) SSRIs are therefore drugs that induce mitochondrial dysfunction in babies
Serotonin was first named “enteramine” in 1935 meaning “an amino acid derivative present in the gut.”
It was named “serotonin” in 1948, meaning “substance in the blood (sero- for serum) that increases vasoconstriction (-tonin for vascular tone).
In 1952, it was established that entermaine and serotonin were the same compound.
Had serotonin research not been completely perverted by Pharma, it would have become rapidly apparent that these are deeply connected: serotonin’s one role in the entire body is to coordinate mitochondrial function in response to variation in the supply and demand of oxygen. It regulates motility in the gut to prevent local hypoxia. It coordinates blood flow to maximize efficiency of oxygen delivery.
But when SSRIs were released in 1986, Pharma solidified the destruction of these lines of inquiry by selecting a thread started by the influence of LSD in the 1950s that claimed serotonin was a lever to be pulled to manipulate the state of the brain.
The “R” in SSRIs is an insidious lie.
It implies that SSRIs specifically inhibit “reuptake” of serotonin, a phenomenon only relevant to the first neuron of a synapse.
This created the total mythology that the one thing they do is keep serotonin in the synapse longer to have greater activity on the receiving neuron.
They knew this was false.
They knew these are generic inhibitors of the serotonin transporter, which is not primarily found in the brain and is not primarily found in neurons.
Its has tremendous expression in the gut, lungs, and reproductive organs.
It’s found inside cells, most likely mediating the established direct transport of serotonin into mitochondria.
On a cellular basis the highest expression is in enterocytes, not in enteric neurons, and in the placenta.
The word “SSRI” is pure propaganda meant to cut out almost all of the relevant serotonin research in the way that Stalin cut out Trotsky from all the pictures of the two of them with Lenin to paint himself as Lenin’s true successor.
They are “serotonin transporter inhibitors.”
Until the concept of reuptake inhibition is recognized fundamentally as propaganda instead of science, no one is going to understand why these drugs cause birth defects and alterations to fetal brain development or why they stop you from being able to feel your genitals and nipples or why tapering from long-term use causes catastrophic new-onset syndromes that have little to do with why anyone took them in the first place.
I was invited to speak on tech + VC at the Oxford Union, a historically prestigious venue dating to 1823
I have withdrawn + declined
until cultural leadership from the top celebrates peace + coexistence + civil discourse + denounces violence
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
While the Pharma funded fact checkers swear the SV40 isn’t there…
BioNTech quietly files with the EMA admitting it’s in fact there.
They might clean it up.
Might not.
Your body makes better anti-anxiety drugs than Pfizer...
But only if your vagus nerve works.
This nerve controls heart rate, stress tolerance (& 30 critical functions) that keep you alive.
Since 1 in 3 people have damaged theirs, here's how to fix it: 🧵
Japan has administered more mRNA vaccines per capita than any other nation on Earth.
Japan also has recorded nearly half a million excess deaths since 2021.
What could possibly explain this sudden and persistent jump in death?
BREAKING: President Trump just brokered peace between Congo and Rwanda — ending a war that’s killed millions over decades.
No awards. No media praise.
Just real results.
He’s stopped wars in Africa, the Balkans, the Middle East — even laid groundwork for Israel/Iran.
But they still won’t give him a Nobel Peace Prize?
Because he’s Donald Trump.
But history will remember.
Results > Recognition.
Thoughts? ⬇️ 🇺🇸
If a surgeon tells you surgery is the only option, get a second opinion. Unless it’s an emergency, there is usually a non-surgical option to try first.
Can we trust ‘independent peer review’?
When @MHRAgovuk rejected @CherylGrainger4's FOI request for the data they held about covid vaccine adverse reactions in pregnancy, they cited a Section 22 exemption. This “provides an exemption for information that is intended to be published in the future”. Specifically, the MHRA argued that the data could not be revealed until it was published in a peer-reviewed journal, since otherwise it could be misintepreted and possibly ‘encourage vaccine hesitancy’.
in preparation for the first Tribunal hearing to determine if MHRA should release the data, I submitted testimony about the questionable value of peer review. My full testimony is in the article linked in reply. As this was part of a legal affidavit, I had to be rather ‘measured’ in what I said. What I'd like to have said was that the entire process of academic peer review has become so corrupted and disfunctional that it's almost meaningless.
A simple, powerful & innovative general approach by @stkirsch to analyzing impact of an intervention. Applied to Czech population data (assuming vaxx dates accurate) it shows covid vaccines increased rather than decreased the all-cause mortality rate.
https://t.co/obml8c7lCM
By downplaying and covering up what they knew about COVID-19 injection-induced myocarditis, federal health officials violated the inviolable principle of informed consent with their experimental jab.
🚨 Two independent studies demolish the “millions saved” COVID-19 vaccine myth:
🔹 Dr. Raphael Lataster’s Meta-Critique
-Exposes the Watson et al study as a manufactured illusion—held together by statistical tricks, false efficacy claims, and pharma-driven agendas.
🔹 “The Discrepancy Between the Number of Saved Lives with COVID-19 Vaccination and Statistics of Our World in Data”
-Used real-world data to show that the claim of millions of lives saved by mRNA injections is mathematically and observationally impossible.
👉 Both studies reach the same conclusion:
The “14 million lives saved” narrative is fiction.
@OkayThenNews