@CollinRugg New angle of the attempted Trump assassınation shows how he turned his head at just the right moment.
What do you think, did God have a hand over Trump today?
On The 14th of June 1946 a baby boy was born In the Jamaica district of Queens, New York.
In 1995 his car had a flat tire. A black man walking by noticed the owner was wearing a suit, so he stepped in and fixed the flat.
"How can I repay you?" asked the gentleman. "My wife has always wanted some flowers," the man says.
A few days later, the man's wife received a beautiful bouquet of flowers with a note saying, "thanks for helping me. By the way, the mortgage on your house is paid off."
A United States Marine spent 7 months in a Mexican prison on a minor charge. He was beaten.
After he was returned to America, the man from Queens sent him a check for $25,000, "To get you started."
A black bus driver saved a suicidal girl from jumping off a bridge. The man from Queen sent him a check for $10,000.
A rabbi's critically ill son needed to get from NYC to California for special care but no airlines would fly him.
The generous man from Queens used his private jet to fly the child.
This kind man from Queens did many other quiet acts of kindness over the years.
Everyone loved him.
I'm voting for Donald Trump!
#614clinton
https://t.co/cojfQ9ofHL
A study that Christine Brophy and I did in 2016 clearly and powerfully indicated that low verbal intelligence and being female was associated with woke authoritarianism
Just saying
That was just before my university career imploded and such research became impossible to conduct
God only knows why it was necessary
:)
Your doctor can’t do 10 pushups.
But yet you keep trusting them to take care of your health.
Here are 20 mind-blowing things they don’t want you to know about the “sick-care” system:
Why I’m Backing President Trump
As many press accounts have reported, I’m hosting a fundraising event for President Donald J. Trump at my home in San Francisco this evening.
Over the last couple of years, I have hosted events for presidential candidates Ron DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as well as several Congressional figures in both major parties. I give to many, but endorse few.
But today I am giving my endorsement to our 45th President, Donald J. Trump, to be our 47th President. My reasons rest on four main issues that I think are vital to American prosperity, security, and stability – issues where the Biden administration has veered badly off course and where I believe President Trump can lead us back.
1. The Economy
President Biden took over an economy that was already recovering strongly from the Covid-induced shock of Q2 2020. Demand had roared back, and employment had recovered. But he chose to keep priming the pump with unnecessary Covid stimulus – almost $2 trillion of it, passed on a straight party-line vote in March of 2021, with trillions more to follow for “infrastructure,” green energy, and “inflation reduction.”
Biden did this despite early warnings from former Clinton Treasury Secretary Larry Summers that it could lead to inflation. When the inflation came, the Biden administration dismissed it as “transitory.” In fact, inflation still remains persistently high even after the fastest interest-rate tightening cycle in memory.
As a result of Biden’s inflation, average Americans have lost roughly a fifth of their purchasing power over the last few years. Moreover, any American who needs a mortgage, car loan, or credit card debt faces much higher interest costs, which further constrain their purchasing power.
It’s no different for our federal government, which now must devote over a trillion dollars annually to interest on its $34 trillion debt, a massive sum that’s been growing by a trillion dollars every hundred days. This trajectory is unsustainable, yet Biden’s 2025 budget calls for even higher spending.
Growth has already slowed from 3.4 percent in the last quarter of 2023 to an anemic 1.3 percent in the first quarter of this year. We can’t afford another four years of Bidenomics.
2. Foreign Policy / Ukraine War
President Trump left office with ISIS defeated, the Abraham Accords signed, and no new wars raging on the global stage. Three and a half years later, the world is on fire. President Biden has made several strategic choices that have contributed to this situation.
In his first year in office, Biden unnecessarily alienated the Saudis before realizing that they are an indispensable partner in the Middle East. He also presided over a chaotic withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan (right policy, abysmal execution).
But his biggest blunder by far has been in Ukraine. His administration immediately began pushing for Ukraine’s admission to NATO, despite no unanimity among the existing NATO members that such a move was a good idea. When this predictably antagonized the Russians, the Biden administration doubled down at every turn, insisting that “NATO’s door is open, and will remain open” with respect to Ukraine. Biden himself baited Russia when he said he didn’t “accept anybody’s red lines.”
After the invasion, there was still a chance to stop the war in its early weeks before much loss of life and destruction had occurred. Russian and Ukrainian negotiators had signed a draft agreement in Istanbul that would have seen Russia retreat to its pre-invasion borders in exchange for Ukrainian neutrality. But the Biden administration rejected that deal as well as General Milley’s advice to seek a diplomatic solution in November 2022.
As the war of attrition grinds on, the Ukrainians face ever-mounting casualties and infrastructure damage. Still, President Biden keeps allowing the conflict to escalate and risk World War III. Every escalation that Biden initially resisted – Abrams tanks, F-16’s, ATACMs, allowing Ukraine to hit targets in Russia – he has eventually acquiesced to. There is just one more escalation to go: NATO troops on the ground fighting Russia directly. And our European allies like Emmanuel Macron are already spoiling for exactly this scenario.
With Biden, our choices are limited to fighting the proxy war to the last Ukrainian, or fighting Russia ourselves. President Trump has said he wants the dying in Ukraine to stop, and that he will seek to end the war through a negotiated settlement. Ukraine will no longer be able to get the deal we talked them out of in April 2022, but we can still save Ukraine as an independent nation and avert world war.
3. The Border
As an immigrant to the United States myself, I certainly believe in America’s history of strengthening its ranks by welcoming talented people from other nations seeking freedom and opportunity. But that promise requires an orderly process of legal immigration that emphasizes skills and the principles of American citizenship. This was the preferred policy under President Trump.
What Biden ushered in was a de facto open border policy. On his first day in office, he repealed President Trump’s executive orders restricting illegal immigration and stopped construction of a border wall, selling off parts of it for scrap metal. This quickly resulted in a massive spike in illegal border crossings and a chaotic and dangerous situation on our southern border.
President Biden (along with the hapless Kamala Harris and the malevolent Homeland Security Chief Alejandro Mayorkas) responded to growing concerns by gaslighting the American public, saying there was no problem at the border despite constant videos of masses of people sprinting across it.
When the situation became too dire to ignore or deny, Biden claimed he didn’t have the executive authority to do anything about it and blamed Republicans for not sending him legislation. But this week, facing abysmal polling numbers on this issue, Biden suddenly discovered he has executive authority after all. The order he signed is a tepid, too little-too late effort to slow the tidal wave of illegal immigration in time for the election. But Biden has shown he is not serious on this issue. If he wins a second term, the open border policy will resume, and tens of millions more illegals will stream across the border.
4. Lawfare
A bedrock of the political stability we’ve enjoyed in America over the last 250 years is that we don’t accept attempts to jail political opponents in order to win an election. Yet Biden has pushed for selective and unprecedented prosecutions of his once and future opponent from the moment he assumed office.
Merrick Garland took a long look at the January 6 situation and didn’t see a path to prosecute Trump, even after a one-sided Congressional committee sent a highly-prejudiced referral to his Justice Department. Press stories then appeared describing Biden’s frustration with Garland’s reticence. The result was Jack Smith at the federal level and Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis at the state level. All have pursued cases based on novel legal theories heretofore unseen and designed to get Trump. In the NY case, Bragg resurrected a dead book-keeping misdemeanor into 34 felonies by claiming it was in the service of a second crime that he never defined and that the judge never insisted the jury unanimously agree on.
My immigration to this country as a young boy happened because my parents disagreed with the political system of their home country. That government sought to solve its political disagreements by imprisoning its political enemies. What a sad irony that the lawfare we escaped has now reared its ugly head in America of all places.
President Biden keeps insisting that a return of President Trump to the White House threatens democracy. But his administration is the one that has colluded with tech platforms to censor the Internet, used the intelligence community to cover up his son Hunter’s laptop, and pursued elective prosecutions against his political opponents.
Conclusion: The A/B Test
The voters have experienced four years of President Trump and four years of President Biden. In tech, we call this an A/B test. With respect to economic policy, foreign policy, border policy, and legal fairness, Trump performed better. He is the President who deserves a second term.
@DrAseemMalhotra "It's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated."
In a shocking turn, mainstream voices who censored and suppressed conversation around vaccine injury have reversed course. Yet they’re “limited hangout” falls short of full accountability or vindication for the injured. Del has a message for Chris Cuomo. https://t.co/L1dK5Isl6e
If you vote to send our money abroad while waving a foreign flag, you’ll be called an American patriot.
If you vote to keep our money at home to fund domestic priorities like the border, you’ll be called a foreign agent.
Bizarro world.
🚨💉” The CDC REDACTS every single word of a 140 page Study on Myocarditis”
“The entire thing is redacted - what good is a study if there’s nothing there - then I want to know what might have been there?”
“We are seeing a massive cover up of a massive Consumer safety debacle”
Surely at this point it’s clear what’s happening - anyone who took the vaccines - please let me know - aren’t you curious what the FDA CDC & Big Pharma are trying to conceal here?
Caller Drops Chilling Question on Robert Kennedy Jr.
“You are going after some of the largest entities that exist ... Are you going to live? Are they going to come after you?”
“There’s a lot worse things than dying,” @RobertKennedyJr responded.
“And one of those things is living like a slave or having our children lose all the freedoms that so many generations of Americans died to give us and to protect.”
Kennedy continued.
“We have to be willing, our generation, to make sacrifices to make sure that we don’t lose them. And we’ve seen attacks, unprecedented attacks, on our freedom of speech, on our freedom of worship, on all of the amendments of the Constitution over the past three years. They’re unprecedented. And it’s important for everybody to stand up and say, ‘We’re not going to do this.’ Even if there’s some risks involved, reputational risks, salary risks, we need to make sacrifices for our country.”
🚨🇦🇺 Pfizer to Senator Pauline Hanson
"Nobody was forced to take the vaccine”
Incredible compilation clip of the Coercion that took place in Australia - people were forced to inject or lose their jobs & homes.
As the Covid & vaccine narrative continues to completely implode - watch Politicians & Health officials who promoted these toxic shots scurry to the nearest rock for cover.
This coercive blackmail happened in Lockstep across the World
In a saga that could easily be the plot of a dystopian novel, the unfolding of the ArriveCan app scandal unveils a disturbing vista into the Canadian government's labyrinth of power, where silence is golden, and accountability seems to be an alien concept. At the heart of this intrigue are Cameron MacDonald and Antonio Utano, caught in the gears of a system that seems all too ready to sacrifice its own in a bid to preserve the status quo. MacDonald, leveraging the expertise—or lack thereof—of Kristian Firth, navigated the murky waters of procurement procedures to his benefit, exploiting loopholes that, while pre-existing, were certainly not put there for the taking. Firth, for his part, appears to have ghosted through the ArriveCan project, contributing nothing of IT substance yet reaping millions, with MacDonald basking in unearned accolades and promotions that his role in the app's development supposedly warranted.
But let's not be naive—this isn't just a tale of two men gaming the system. This is a narrative of how that very system, riddled with corruption and opacity, seems to have been designed for exploitation. The suspension without pay of MacDonald and Utano smacks not of justice but of an attempt to silence dissent, to quell any voices that dare to challenge the narrative or expose the rot within. And yet, for all their alleged scheming, MacDonald and Utano are but pawns in a larger game, mid-level managers set up to take the fall for a scandal that stinks from the top down.
Meanwhile, figures like Minh Doan, who chose the path of silence, seemingly retain their positions unscathed, a testament to the perverse incentives at play within the CBSA and beyond. The ArriveCan debacle, with its exorbitant costs and questionable efficacy, is not just a failure of technology but a symptom of a deeper malaise—a government apparatus that, under Liberal stewardship, has allowed, if not fostered, a swamp of corruption to flourish.
This was reached its pinnacle in the high-stakes exchange that bore the hallmarks of a courtroom drama yesterday when Larry Brock assumed the role of relentless interrogator during Meeting No. 100 OGGO - Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, armed with a Statement of Fact report from the CBSA's Project Helios and an unwavering commitment to unveiling the intricate tapestry of allegations surrounding Cameron McDonald and Antonio Utano.
The crux of Brock's relentless interrogation revolved around a pivotal section of the Statement of Fact report, specifically paragraph 50 on page 10. Despite extensive redactions, this segment hinted at an enigmatic undercurrent of motivations and actions. The unredacted snippet disclosed a lack of concrete evidence linking Kristian Firth to the alleged solicitation of a bribe for Cameron McDonald, a revelation that cast a shadow of doubt over the entire investigation's integrity. Brock's probing questions not only challenged the transparency of the CBSA's proceedings but also raised profound concerns about the potential omission of critical information from the RCMP's purview.
The narrative took a deeper plunge into murkier waters with the emergence of Minh Doan the former CBSA top brass, suddenly thrust into the spotlight. Brock unveiled shocking allegations surrounding Doan's possession of four years' worth of vital emails, now inexplicably corrupted. This revelation sounded alarm bells regarding the deliberate deletion of sensitive communications, and the sheer magnitude of this potential breach, encompassing a staggering 7 gigabytes or approximately 1,700 emails. These communications held possible relevance to the ArriveCan contracts.
The committee's dynamics underwent a seismic shift as Brock relentlessly sought answers, only to encounter a web of evasion and partial responses. The revelation that Brock, and only Brock, held a copy of the Statement of Fact report—a document seemingly veiled in secrecy—ignited a contentious debate over the distribution of critical information among committee members.
As the vice president of the CBSA, Minh Doan's alleged email deletions constituted not just a breach of protocol but a grave offense, magnified by the significant position of trust and responsibility he held. The scrutiny deepened as Brock probed into when the CBSA's president, Aaron O'Gorman, and the Auditor General were apprised of these allegations. This inquiry exposed a concerning lack of communication and transparency within the upper echelons of the agency.
In a final, unexpected twist, Brock's relentless pursuit of the truth collided head-on with bureaucratic obfuscation, leaving a trail of unresolved questions. The CBSA investigator Michel LaFluer refusal to acknowledge potential criminality in the email deletions alluding to a possible coverup underscored a troubling reluctance to confront the possibility of misconduct within the CBSA. As the segment concluded, an air of tension and anticipation lingered, alongside the nagging feeling that this was merely the tip of the iceberg in unraveling the complexities of Project Helios and the allegations against Cameron McDonald and Antonio Utano.
Garrnett Genuis's cross-examination of Mr. LaFleur transforms into a masterclass in scrutiny, peeling back the veneer of procedural normalcy to reveal the underlying tensions and conflicts at the heart of the CBSA's investigative processes. The spotlight on LaFleur's purported independence becomes a focal point for broader concerns about the credibility and impartiality of internal investigations within government agencies.
Genuis's interrogation methodically dismantles the facade of autonomy that LaFleur attempts to maintain. By questioning the independence of an investigator who remains within the hierarchical folds of the department, Genuis not only challenges LaFleur's personal capacity to conduct an unbiased investigation but also illuminates a systemic flaw: the potential for internal investigations to be influenced, directly or indirectly, by the very structures they are meant to scrutinize.
The inherent conflict Genuis highlights is not merely a question of individual integrity but a structural quandary where the investigator's allegiance to the department could, intentionally or not, color the outcomes of the investigation. This scenario raises the specter of investigations that, rather than being fearless pursuits of truth, become exercises in damage control or, worse, mechanisms for vindicating predetermined narratives.
The Conservative response during this committee, signals a refusal to accept this state of affairs. There's a palpable sense of discontent with pinning the blame on mere mid-managers. The true aim is higher, seeking accountability from the top echelons of power, where the real responsibility for the ArriveScam, as it should aptly be called, lies. This isn't just about rooting out a few bad apples but about excavating the systemic rot that has allowed such scandals to proliferate under the watchful eyes of those who should have been guardians of the public trust.
As this gripping narrative continues to unravel, a troubling reality comes into stark focus—the ArriveCan scandal is not an isolated incident but a microcosm of a much deeper and pervasive issue. The spotlight must extend beyond the actions of individuals like Cameron MacDonald or Antonio Utano, and it's not sufficient to bemoan the loss of millions of taxpayer dollars to the enigmatic figure of Kristian Firth. The true scandal lies in the very environment that allowed such exploitation to thrive, an environment meticulously cultivated and perpetuated by a government seemingly more invested in self-preservation than in safeguarding the interests of its citizens.
The ArriveCan saga serves as a grim reminder that our system has been marred by a culture of complacency, where accountability is often elusive, and transparency is sacrificed at the altar of political expediency. It is within this labyrinthine bureaucracy that individuals like MacDonald and Utano could operate with impunity, their actions shrouded in secrecy until the cracks in the facade grew too wide to ignore.
The notion of having departments investigate themselves, as we've witnessed in this investigation, reeks of a system plagued by conflicts of interest and a lack of genuine oversight. It is a system where the checks and balances have eroded, leaving room for questionable practices and an absence of accountability. The web of intrigue and allegations hints at a deeper, systemic issue, one that extends beyond the boundaries of a single scandal.
As we reflect on this disheartening chapter in our nation's story, it is imperative that we, as citizens, demand change. The call to "drain the swamp" is not a mere slogan but a clarion call to action. We must hold our elected officials accountable, insist on transparency in government proceedings, and demand a system that prioritizes the welfare of its people over political maneuvering.
The ArriveCan scandal should serve as a turning point—a catalyst for a renewed commitment to the principles of integrity, accountability, and service to the nation. It is our duty, as citizens, to ensure that the mistakes of the past are not repeated, and that our government remains steadfast in its duty to protect and serve the interests of the people it represents.
In this pivotal moment, let us remember the words of our founding fathers and the ideals upon which our great nation was built. Let us reclaim the spirit of patriotism and civic duty that has defined us as a people. Together, we can forge a path toward a brighter future, where the shadows of corruption are dispelled by the unyielding light of truth and accountability. It's time to drain the swamp and reclaim the promise of our democracy.
A shocking reaction in a supposedly civilized, free country with rights for individuals. Speaking out comes at a cost – fines, legal woes, jail threats. The harsh reality: those who resisted faced arrests and government harassment, deterring protests with advanced technologies.
https://t.co/hKUCLaTjdu
@jeffreytucker
Pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan explains what is going to happen when vaccinated doctors finally wake up and realize the COVID-19 vaccines have caused great harm to themselves, family members, and patients. US Congressional testimony, January 12, 2024, Rayburn Bldg.
By now most people have seen David Menzies of Rebel News get manhandled, arrested and handcuffed while trying to ask Twitch a question on a public street. Assorted lefties and Liberal apologists have chimed in with "but he's not a journalist, he's not the press." 1/