@HarrietEssex27@TurtleShell412 I’d also have to read his book to see if he referenced where he got that information from because if so i’ll hold my hands up and say my information was not fully informed.
@HarrietEssex27@TurtleShell412 I’d honestly have to double check the references because the standard of proof does not change regardless of the severity of the claim. the evidence has to be clearer, absolutely but 80% is not mentioned anywhere that I have noticed whilst studying.
@HarrietEssex27@TurtleShell412 Not debating who abused who but the civil standard in the UK is 51%, “on the balance of probabilities” so they just had to show that it could’ve happened not that it did which is the criminal standard “beyond all reasonable doubt”
@TheJennyGrace@MirsAmari@Variety did he force her to be in the room with him when she fought to attend everyday of the UK trial when she did in fact not have to be there?
@SueRomulus@rentier13@SamusSilver3@MichelleHoltza3 How is him suing her preventing her from paying? She had the full amount before he sued her and we know she’s not paid her legal fees. So what exactly did him suing her have to do with her not paying?
@Kythedesolate @KarenGiselaLey1 @Starstruck3160 Backed up by evidence provided by a witness not a named defendant. She was not subject to the same discovery rules in the UK as she was in the US. The Sun only had to prove that they believed what Amber was saying, not whether what she was saying was true.
@AlanoRato7 @AnoUzumaki @KeshawnaDavis1 There’s never been a trial for DV. The lost a defamation trial against The Sun. Different defendant, different rules of evidence and discovery compared to the US
@KimM_C @mahoneydavid59 @LucretiaGore @Angenette5@LawCrimeNetwork In this trial it was very different discovery rules and she had to provide a lot more as a named defendant. A judge ruled in favor of the Sun. But in this case despite using transcripts from the UK trial, a jury still found her to be lying about those claims.
@KimM_C @mahoneydavid59 @LucretiaGore @Angenette5@LawCrimeNetwork A single judge ruled on the balance of probabilities its possible those events took place. Because the case was against the Sun and the Sun had to prove they had reason to believe her claims. Heard was not compelled to prove certain evidence as a witness in that trial 1/2
@meme_repeter @Miranda09948415 @pshpshpshpsh999 @VirginMick@DanaRAshmore@SPECTRE_Chief@Raven__Smith@voguemagazine And never thought that while they were living next door supposedly to their friend who was being allegedly being abused that they would take her from that environment and keep her safe? No, they obviously didn’t mind their “friend” being abused as long as they lived rent free
@meme_repeter @Miranda09948415 @pshpshpshpsh999 @VirginMick@DanaRAshmore@SPECTRE_Chief@Raven__Smith@voguemagazine You still haven’t answered my question. What is it that makes you believe her? Because yesterday testimony was laughable. All her witnesses have to go on is what Amber told them. And all of them lived in those penthouses but never saw any violence.
@meme_repeter @Miranda09948415 @pshpshpshpsh999 @VirginMick@DanaRAshmore@SPECTRE_Chief@Raven__Smith@voguemagazine I did and if you genuinely believe that on the James Corden show she had two black eyes, a broken nose and a split lip you need your eyes checking. Still no medical records submitted and the depositions were from people who no longer speak to Amber and freeloaded off JD for years
@meme_repeter @Miranda09948415 @pshpshpshpsh999 @VirginMick@DanaRAshmore@SPECTRE_Chief@Raven__Smith@voguemagazine So where is her evidence of abuse? She’s shown no medical records or photos that actually show the injuries she described. Photos taken of her after the alleged abuse show no injuries. So tell me what exactly makes you believe her? Or do you just believe her cause she’s a woman?