@TradVat2 Yep! Latin is rusty, but I believe “visibile” “omne” and “invisibile” are 3rd declension i-stem. So to form the genitive plural, as you need for “of all things visible and invisible,” you add the ending “-ium.” So you get “visibilium omnium et invisibilium.”
One possibility: Use the cause of action apparently provided by California. See Cal. Civ. Code § 52.1. As a co-author and I argue in a forthcoming article (link below), such causes of action should avoid constitutional/statutory problems. Nor would QI necessarily apply.
Sincerely wondering: what remedies does Justice Kavanaugh believe are and should be available in federal court these days for excessive force violations by federal immigration officials?
Unclear to me the precise nature of this order. Still, in a spirit of shameless self-promotion, I think it may be a good time to bump this piece on "administrative stays" of executive action. Link below.
BREAKING: In a new case, Judge Randolph Moss issued an administrative stay this morning blocking the Trump admin from "moving, transferring, or removing from U.S. custody" the eight men the U.S. wants to send to South Sudan while the stay remains in effect. More to come at Law Dork: https://t.co/AiwpY5i4Q7
Excited that my Essay, So-Called "Administrative Stays" in Trump 2.0, is now out in the Texas Law Review Online. I argue that recent administrative stays of executive action are conceptually confused and lack any apparent legal basis.
Links below.
Update: My essay on the so-called "administrative stays" being issued by DCts at the dawn of Trump 2.0 is forthcoming in the Texas Law Review Online. Thrilled to work with the editors of my undergrad alma mater. Hook 'em!
Link here: https://t.co/CA93954qAO.
Comments welcome!
Interesting theory in today’s Alito dissent about how sovereign immunity interacts with the general law of equity.
(Maybe too interesting to be worked out in an application to stay a TRO, but likely to be a recurring issue.)
@fedjudges Great q. Would need to look at the details of that particular case. In general, though, what I call “true administrative stays” (ie, admin stays of agency action) pose slightly distinct qs. See my analysis in Part IV.
Here's a short-ish essay I wrote on the so-called "administrative stays" being issued at the dawn of Trump 2.0.
https://t.co/CVSZ7F39pA
Bottom line: I argue the so-called "administrative stays" of executive action are probably unlawful.
Very timely piece by @chris_d_moore explaining "administrative stays" and how and why they are often abused today by district courts reviewing Trump administration actions. "So-Called “Administrative Stays” in Trump 2.0"
It is amazing how I can re-read a volume from David Currie's "The Constitution in Congress" and be in awe and inspired each and every time. I can't think of another book on the Constitution that has had that effect on me.