@AlexEpstein Except there are some things you can not undo. You can not undo the removal and demolition of historical tribal lands without sufficient tribal consultation, which this bill leaves open
@HandNF@JamesCTobias Did you not read where they talk about the changes they want made? Also this is one tribe and many Native Organizations such as the NCAI have come out against this in spite of the amendments
@aarmlovi Why is someone who has no connection with indian country trying to tell us what they think? Several Native Organizations including the NCAI have come out against the bill even after the amendment
@ThomasHochman@EvergreenAction You are selectively interpreting #3. They, along with many other tribal advocacy groups have said that they will not support the bill even with the manager amendment.
@Blake_Allen13 I read the changes; it fixed some things, but not all. I am still not confident they are going to get support from those who are opposing it.
@AlexanderPayton I do not think YOU have read the bill. Section 2301 is mainly the section that Indian nations have issues with. Many Indian nations have opposed it.
@ManBanality@Genevieve_207 Those two things are not mutually exclusive. This bill weakens tribal sovereignty in several ways, including allowing the government to build on tribal land. In fact, multiple environmental groups have opposed this bill without amendments. I suggest you do your research
@zachweinberg Have you read the text of the bill? I mean it literally destroys decades of progress for tribal sovereignty. If it helps I can point out what pages
@AlexEpstein If you look at the literal text of the bill it obviously undermines tribal sovereignty. Now I would have more respect for you if instead of dancing around you all would just say that tribal sovereignty is less important than economic development lol.