My commentary on South Korean 'Nuclear Insecurities' is out with IPCS. I take a look at new public polling research and argue that nuclear armament would worsen the ROK's security situation while squandering chances of a diplomatic solution towards peace and denuclearization.
#IPCSCommentary | #SouthKorean Nuclear Insecurities
Chris Gowe analyses the domestic attitudes driving public polling in favour of South Korean #nuclearisation, and the potential costs of such a move.
Read: https://t.co/A9YPn5zxZe
South Korea is no longer just a regional player, but a global actor facing rising expectations. Ramon Pacheco Pardo (@rpachecopardo) explores the ROK's role amidst an evolving international environment at the start of the new Lee Jae-myung administration. https://t.co/xaNfPMc45w
Is the world on the brink of a new nuclear arms race? Benjamin Engel (@benjaminaengel) examines the unraveling of nuclear non-proliferation efforts under Trump, the rise of allied proliferation, and what this means for the Korean Peninsula. Read more: https://t.co/X6hVI7Xvum
@cloverdred@demsmight@ChaseMit@kasie@brianstelter@jeffzeleny@CNN Pelosi privately told Biden that the polls show he can't win. It's so over for Biden, we would have a better chance with any other candidate. It's not 100% confirmed that Kamela would replace him, they'll be a mini primary probably.
📝 One year after the landmark Washington Declaration, my article explores the progress made in strengthening extended deterrence via the Nuclear Consultative Group and the ongoing challenges posed by North Korea's nuclear threats.
https://t.co/JCEiuUUowp
📊 Faced with North Korean threats and uncertainty over US commitments, support for South Korean nuclear armament remains high. My article explores the potential implications of a 2nd Trump Presidency on the nuclear armament debate in South Korea. https://t.co/MBbrH3RXCf
@hong_ijin@KasulisK I dont think it would have been realistic for the government to ban partying in Itaewon without pretext. If the crowds are too big the city police are responsible for dispersing the crowd, I don't think theres going to be a super effective political spin to come out of this tbh.
@hong_ijin@KasulisK What could the government have possibly done to prevent this, it seems like a straight forward local law enforcement crowd control issue
@Armyvet74@conservatismDNA@benshapiro The president does not have the authority to declassify documents related to nuclear weapons. The energy department would also have to sign off.
@Joelivre @TonyVRinna Yes good point, I guess those suggesting that Ukraine should have kept them are referring to that political decision as the mistake. Anyway who knows what kind of Russian response it would have provoked if they tried to gain control, could easily have been pretext for war earlier
@TonyVRinna Just reading about this now but apparently there was a way for them to gain "positive control" over the nuclear weapons in fairly short order. At the time US officials believed that Ukranian scientists had sufficient capabilities to crack the codes.
https://t.co/uqX8mQsTV9
@itstechtron @DubstepInDPRK I don't think that taking seriously nonpartisan US intelligence assessments that Russia interfered in the 2016 election is at all equivalent to 2020 election lies and the ensuing insurrection. Your both sides narrative is really helpful to authoritarians though.
@itstechtron @DubstepInDPRK The things you listed are all individually debatable and even then no where near the magnitude and severity of the lies and disinformation that are mainstream on the American right. QAnon is fake, the election wasn't stolen. There is no "both sides" here.