Key takeaways :
1. For the purposes of art. 10.2 WADC, on which derives the ADC, an athlete can discharge his burden of proving, on a balance of probabilities, that his ADRV was not intentional even if he is not able to establish the source of the prohibited substance.
👉The award in the Andrea Iannone v. FIM / WADA v. FIM & Andrea Iannone case is now on the CAS website https://t.co/FLPi7maxTV #sportsarbitration#andreaiannone
7. The above analysis is not to be confused with the regimes provided by art. 10.4 or 10.5 WADC (in particular the one concerning contaminated products), which apply only if a lack of intent according to 10.2 WADC is established (end).