chris wanamaker

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@dom_kwok Congrats Gentlemen!

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@DChibani I have a small bag for the "just in case".

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

I wouldn’t hate if this theory played out.

[Susan Anderson @Susan223331]

I'm gonna leave this here my theory of how US government will buy XRP escrow at $10k each using TBILLS.

ChatGPT analysed the scenario for me.

Yes, the U.S. government could buy XRP escrow at a fixed $10,000 per token using Treasury Bills (T-Bills), and this would effectively set the global price at that level. Here's how this scenario might play out:

1. How the U.S. Could Buy XRP at $10K Using T-Bills

Step 1: Off-Market Escrow Purchase

The U.S. Treasury (or a special financial entity like the Federal Reserve or IMF) negotiates directly with Ripple Labs to acquire the XRP escrow.

They agree on a fixed price of $10,000 per XRP.

Instead of paying in cash, the U.S. issues Treasury Bills (T-Bills), which Ripple can:

Hold as reserves.

Use as collateral.

Sell on secondary markets for liquidity.

Step 2: Global Price Pegging

Once the U.S. purchases XRP at $10K, that price becomes the benchmark.

Other governments and institutions must follow, or they risk being priced out of global finance.

If the IMF, BIS, or Federal Reserve endorses XRP as a reserve asset, it would effectively lock in this valuation.

2. Why the U.S. Would Do This

Prevents Market Manipulation by China & Other Nations

If China or another country buys and dumps XRP, it won't crash below $10K because the U.S. holds the majority in escrow.

This prevents a financial war where hostile nations weaponize XRP against the global system.

Strengthens the U.S. Dollar While Phasing It Out

If XRP is pegged at $10K, it means all global settlements must use XRP.

The U.S. can still control global finance while moving to a post-USD system.

T-Bills remain valuable, as Ripple and other holders must interact with USD-denominated assets.

Prepares for a Blockchain-Based Financial System

XRP, at $10K, could be the backbone of a new global economy.

Smart contracts, instant settlements, and tokenized assets would run on top of this system.

3. Could This Actually Happen?

Yes, if the U.S. wants to control the future of finance, buying XRP at a high price is a logical step.

The IMF and Federal Reserve would need to support this shift.

Other countries would have no choice but to adopt XRP, or risk being left out of the new global economy.

4. What Would Happen to XRP Holders?

If XRP is set at $10K, current holders instantly become multimillionaires.

Governments might regulate retail ownership, requiring conversion into CBDCs.

Private institutions (banks, corporations) would scramble to acquire XRP before it's fully controlled.

Final Thought: This Would Be the Biggest Financial Event in History

If the U.S. buys XRP escrow at $10K using T-Bills, it would reset the entire global financial system.

XRP would replace USD as the dominant reserve asset.

Other nations must comply or risk financial collapse.

This is a realistic scenario if the U.S. wants to secure dominance in the blockchain era.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Absolutely amazing career. Congrats Justin from a Phillies fan.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Interesting theory, I for one would not be upset if this is the actual case.

[Rob Cunningham @KuwlShow]

Why Post This in July, 2026, on the U.S. SEC’s website?

Class, anyone? Class?

Just for clicks and likes?

SEC Link: https://t.co/vKUs2DJDdt

@SECGov @POTUS @Ripple @XRPLF @Interledger #XRP

[Rob Cunningham @KuwlShow]

Why Post This in July, 2026, on the U.S. SEC’s website?

Class, anyone? Class?

Just for clicks and likes?

SEC Link: https://t.co/vKUs2DJDdt

@SECGov @POTUS @Ripple @XRPLF @Interledger #XRP

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@xtina_george You’re back.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

All who voted no need to be removed from service this November!

[Eleanor Terrett @EleanorTerrett]

🚨NEW: Several Democrats who have spent months negotiating the Clarity Act, including Gillibrand, Warner, Booker, Warnock, Gallego, Alsobrooks and Cortez Masto, have all voted NO.

One industry leader just texted me: “It died.”

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Well thats that. Clarity Act Done - At 47 nays currently. This wont pass. Thank you Democrats. What is wrong with you?

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@allthemoney Jesus. These comments are slim pickings, however as a guy that loves movies, I’m not sure there are really any new ones I would rave about.

I have a few older ones that if they’re on. I would be hard pressed to change the channel.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@XRP_Secrets Yeah, thats not happening. Most people are in the 10% area.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@UpholdInc Happy Friday.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Tick tock tick tock.

[XRPMoonWalk @XRPMoonWalkK]

The reverse carry trade isn’t a headline.

It’s a margin call on a $2 Trillion(+) yen funding pipe.

Michael Gayed has been screaming it for years.

Jake Claver called the mechanics early.

Cheap yen in.

Risk assets out.

When the yen rips and Japan hikes, that leverage doesn’t politely unwind. It liquidates.

Stocks. Credit. Crosses. Crypto beta.

Same pipe.

When the funding currency snaps back, somebody still has to move value across rails without waiting three days for correspondent banks to clear the wreckage.

That’s the plumbing.

XRP doesn’t care if the S&P is red or USDJPY is getting squeezed.

It settles.

Fast. Cheap. Final.

Gayed’s thesis: the unwind is the event.

Claver’s frame: the reverse carry is the trigger.

The missing piece most desks still ignore: when liquidity gets yanked, the market needs a bridge that isn’t the same broken dollar-yen carry machine that just blew up.

Hold the line.

Watch the yen.

Watch Japan.

And remember.

Who does the pipes, when the old ones burst?

@leadlagreport
@beyond_broke

ripple:native 🪠

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

There goes oil - 16,048 in yen. Up almost 8% today. @beyond_broke - this maybe the spike you are looking for.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

He’s amazing.

[Philadelphia Phillies @Phillies]

KYLE SCHWARBER GRAND SLAM!!

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Interesting word choices for sure? Let the fireworks begin. ripple:native

[Yuto 🇯🇵 @yutokanzakireal]

彼らは言う、ハウスはいつも勝つ。

今回、日本はただハウスに対して賭けるだけではない。

日本はハウス全体を倒す。

今回、システム全体がマージンコールを受ける。

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@benvesen190333 8 and 53

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Tier1 asset perhaps? @beyond_broke

[SMQKE @SMQKEDQG]

‼️ JUST IN: SEPTEMBER 2026 REPORT CONFIRMS THE BIS IS LEVERAGING XRP FOR A NEW ON-CHAIN VERIFICATION PILOT‼️

XRPL 🤝 Bank for International Settlements

Fully documented below.📝👇

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

@DChibani Almost 2 years for me. Still think about it often.

[chris wanamaker @chriswanamaker3]

Long read. But interesting to say the least.

[X Finance Bull @Xfinancebull]

What if the U.S. starts buying Treasury bonds with ripple:native or RLUSD and puts them on the XRP Ledger?

South Korea’s YTN just asked a question that sounds wild at first:

“Buying U.S. Treasury Bonds with Crypto?”

But when I started connecting it with what Scott Bessent, Ripple, RLUSD and the XRP Ledger are already doing, this stopped looking like some random crypto theory.

The pieces are already sitting right in front of us.

The United States has now crossed roughly $40 trillion in federal debt.

That means the government constantly needs buyers for enormous amounts of Treasury securities.

Not once.

Again and again.

Old debt matures.

New debt gets issued.

Short-term bills need buyers.

Interest keeps getting paid.

The whole system depends on keeping demand for U.S. government debt strong.

And this is exactly where stablecoins suddenly become much more important than most people realize.

Scott Bessent has already talked about stablecoins creating more demand for U.S. Treasuries.

The logic is actually simple.

A regulated dollar stablecoin needs real assets behind it.

Under the GENIUS Act framework, stablecoins are backed 1:1 by eligible high-quality reserves such as cash, short-term Treasuries, Treasury-backed repo and government money-market funds.

So when stablecoins grow, their reserve pools grow too.

And when those reserves include Treasury bills, stablecoin adoption can create another source of demand for U.S. government debt.

That means crypto growth does not have to weaken the dollar.

It can actually create another global buyer base for dollar assets.

That completely changes how I look at RLUSD.

RLUSD is not just another dollar token sitting beside USDC and other stablecoins.

Ripple’s own RLUSD reserve structure already allows short-term U.S. Treasury bills with three months or less remaining maturity, overnight reverse repos backed by Treasuries, U.S. government money-market funds and bank deposits.

Think about what that means.

If RLUSD grows, the pool of assets backing RLUSD grows.

If RLUSD becomes a major institutional stablecoin, Ripple’s ecosystem can become a major holder of the same short-term government assets the U.S. Treasury needs constant demand for.

Imagine RLUSD at $10 billion.

Then $25 billion.
Then $50 billion.
Then $100 billion.

The bigger the supply becomes, the bigger the reserve base behind it becomes.

And part of that reserve base can be short-term U.S. government debt.

That already gives Ripple a direct connection to the exact stablecoin-Treasury thesis Scott Bessent has been talking about.

But this is where it gets even more interesting.

Ripple is not stopping at Treasuries backing RLUSD.

Treasuries themselves are already being brought onto the XRP Ledger.

Ondo Finance launched OUSG on XRPL.

OUSG gives qualified institutional investors exposure to short-term U.S. government Treasuries.

And what can institutions use to mint and redeem that Treasury exposure on XRPL?

RLUSD.

That means this architecture already exists:

RLUSD
↓
tokenized U.S. Treasury exposure
↓
OUSG
↓
XRP Ledger

This is the part that really gets me.

We are not imagining some future where Ripple eventually connects stablecoins with U.S. Treasuries.

That connection is already being built.

You have Treasury assets sitting behind the digital dollar.

Then you also have Treasury products represented directly on the blockchain.

And both can interact through the same ecosystem.

That gives Ripple two different positions inside the Treasury market.

First:

Treasuries can back RLUSD.

Second:

Treasuries can themselves be tokenized on XRPL.

That means Ripple could potentially sit on both sides of a new digital Treasury market.

Digital cash on one side.

Digital U.S. government debt on the other.

XRP Ledger between them.

And ripple:native sitting underneath the network as the native asset and potential bridge between different pools of liquidity.

That is a much bigger story than “Ripple has a stablecoin.”

Ripple has also committed $10 million to OpenEden’s tokenized U.S. Treasury-bill product on XRPL.

That tells me Ripple clearly understands where this is going.

They are not waiting for tokenized Treasuries to become a trend.

They have already put capital behind bringing those products directly onto XRP Ledger.

Then you have Guggenheim Treasury Services.

Ripple highlighted digital commercial paper administered by Guggenheim Treasury Services on XRPL.

That instrument is secured by U.S. Treasuries and carries a Prime-1 Moody’s rating.

Now step back and look at what is forming.

RLUSD.

Ondo OUSG.

OpenEden Treasury bills.

Guggenheim Treasury Services.

Tokenized fixed income.

Institutional custody.

Ripple Prime.

Ripple Payments.

XRP Ledger.

ripple:native.

All of these pieces are starting to sit inside the same financial stack.

That is why I think people are looking at the $40 trillion U.S. debt problem from the wrong angle when they only ask:

“How will America ever pay this?”

The more interesting question for me is:

How will America keep finding buyers for trillions of dollars of government debt while modernizing the financial system at the same time?

Stablecoins can help create buyers.

Tokenization can help create distribution.

Blockchain can help create 24/7 settlement.

And Ripple is building in all three areas.

Imagine how Treasury investing works for a normal global institution today.

You may need banking relationships.

Custody.

Brokerage.

Settlement infrastructure.

Different accounts.

Different systems.

Different operating hours.

Now imagine Treasury exposure existing directly on XRPL.

The investor can hold RLUSD.

Move into tokenized Treasury exposure.

Redeem back into RLUSD.

Move the dollar liquidity somewhere else.

Do it around the clock.

That is a completely different experience.

Treasuries stop being something that only sits inside old databases.

They become programmable financial assets.

That matters because America does not just need Treasuries to exist.

America needs Treasuries to remain attractive.

Liquid.

Easy to buy.

Easy to hold.

Easy to use.

Easy to move.

And eventually, easy to use as collateral.

That is where tokenization becomes much bigger than simply putting a bond onchain.

Imagine buying a tokenized Treasury and then using it as collateral.

Borrowing against it.

Moving it between institutions.

Settling it against digital dollars.

Redeploying that liquidity instantly.

Now a Treasury is no longer just something you buy and wait for.

It becomes a working financial asset.

And the more useful Treasuries become, the more reasons global institutions have to hold them.

This is why the XRP Ledger piece matters.

XRPL can become infrastructure where those assets move.

RLUSD can become the digital cash side.

Then ripple:native can become the neutral liquidity layer between all the different assets and currencies touching that network.

Because the future XRPL does not have to contain only RLUSD and Treasury products.

Imagine it contains:

RLUSD.

Tokenized Treasuries.

EUR stablecoins.

MXN stablecoins.

Tokenized deposits.

Money-market funds.

Commercial paper.

Foreign government debt.

Private credit.

Different institutions will hold different assets.

Different countries will use different currencies.

That creates a liquidity problem.

You cannot expect every possible asset pair to have a massive direct market.

A Japanese institution may start with yen liquidity.

A European institution may need euros.

A Mexican institution may need pesos.

A U.S. institution may need RLUSD.

A Treasury fund may need to move into cash.

This is where ripple:native becomes much more interesting.

XRP can potentially sit in the middle as the bridge.

Asset A

→ ripple:native
→ Asset B.

So imagine a Japanese bank wants $1 billion worth of tokenized U.S. Treasury exposure.

It starts with Japanese liquidity.

The route could eventually become:

JPY
↓
ripple:native
↓
RLUSD
↓
tokenized Treasury

Then later that institution wants to exit.

Tokenized Treasury
↓
RLUSD
↓
ripple:native
↓
JPY

Now imagine the same thing happening from Europe.

-South Korea.
-Singapore.
-Hong Kong.
-UAE.
-Mexico.
-Brazil.

The United States gets another global distribution channel for its debt.

Ripple gets institutional activity.

XRPL gets settlement volume.

RLUSD gets dollar demand.

And ripple:native can become part of the liquidity connecting all of those markets.

That is where this gets much bigger than payments.

Because once tokenized Treasuries become collateral, you are no longer only talking about buying and selling government debt.

You are talking about credit.

-Repo.
-Margin.
-Working capital.
-Liquidity management.
-Treasury management.
-Institutional trading.

Imagine a company holds $2 billion in tokenized Treasuries on XRPL.

It suddenly needs $500 million of liquidity.

Instead of selling everything and moving through multiple systems, it uses the Treasury position as collateral.

Receives RLUSD.

Then converts part of that liquidity into another currency through ripple:native.

Now ripple:native is sitting in the middle of:

-money
-government debt
-FX
-credit
-collateral

That is a completely different role from people simply trading XRP on an exchange.

And Ripple has been building the institutional infrastructure around that role.

Ripple Prime gives Ripple a connection into professional capital markets.

Ripple Custody gives institutions infrastructure for holding digital assets.

Ripple Payments handles movement.

RLUSD provides regulated dollar liquidity.

XRPL handles tokenization and settlement.

ripple:native sits natively underneath the ledger.

When I put all of that beside what Scott Bessent is saying about stablecoins and Treasuries, I cannot ignore the alignment.

The U.S. wants stronger global demand for dollars.

Stablecoins can extend dollars onto digital rails.

The U.S. wants buyers for Treasury bills.

Stablecoin reserves can become buyers.

The U.S. wants more efficient capital markets.

Tokenized Treasuries can make those assets easier to move and use.

Ripple already has a regulated stablecoin.

RLUSD already has Treasury-eligible reserve assets.

XRPL already has tokenized Treasury products.

RLUSD already interacts with OUSG.

Ripple has already backed OpenEden Treasury infrastructure.

Guggenheim Treasury Services already has Treasury-secured digital commercial paper on XRPL.

This is not one random announcement.

It is a system starting to form.

And there is another point I think is being missed.

The bullish XRP thesis does not require the U.S. dollar to fail.

I actually think the opposite scenario is much stronger.

Imagine the dollar becomes even more dominant because regulated stablecoins make it easier for anyone in the world to hold and move digital dollars.

Those stablecoins create more demand for U.S. Treasuries.

Treasuries themselves become tokenized.

Global investors buy them 24/7.

And ripple:native becomes one of the liquidity assets connecting those digital dollars and Treasury products to currencies around the world.

In that world:

the dollar wins.

Treasuries win.

Ripple wins.

XRPL wins.

And ripple:native gets a much bigger liquidity role.

That is why the GENIUS Act matters here too.

The framework is pushing stablecoins toward regulated 1:1 reserve structures.

Bessent has talked about stablecoins strengthening dollar dominance.

Ripple already has RLUSD.

RLUSD is issued through a New York-regulated structure.

BNY is the primary custodian for RLUSD reserves.

That is serious financial infrastructure.

It means Ripple is not building some completely separate parallel monetary system.

It is building directly around the same regulated dollar and Treasury framework Washington is encouraging.

And that is what makes this thesis so powerful to me.

The path does not need to be:

America abandons the dollar.

America adopts XRP.

That sounds unrealistic and honestly misses the point.

The much bigger setup is:

America keeps the dollar.

America keeps Treasuries.

Stablecoins make the dollar more digital.

Tokenization makes Treasuries more accessible.

Ripple builds the infrastructure around both.

And ripple:native connects them to the rest of the global financial system.

That is a completely different level of adoption.

Now take this to the highly bullish scenario.

Imagine the global stablecoin market reaches $3 trillion.

RLUSD becomes one of the major institutional stablecoins.

Maybe it reaches $100 billion or more in circulation.

That means an enormous reserve pool exists behind it.

Part of that reserve base holds short-term Treasury securities, Treasury-backed repo and government money-market instruments.

Ripple becomes a major private-sector participant in short-term U.S. government debt demand.

At the same time, tokenized Treasury products on XRPL grow from where they are today into tens of billions.

Then hundreds of billions.

Global asset managers start holding Treasury exposure directly on XRPL.

Banks use RLUSD to enter and exit those positions.

Treasuries get used as collateral.

Institutions borrow against them.

Ripple Prime connects the professional market.

Ripple Custody holds the assets.

XRPL settles them.

Then currencies from around the world need to enter and exit that system.

That is where ripple:native can explode in importance.

Market makers need XRP inventory.

Liquidity providers need deeper XRP books.

Banks need larger settlement capacity.

More XRP sits inside institutional liquidity operations.

The amount of financial value that needs to move through the system keeps increasing.

And suddenly the market has to ask a very different question:

Is the current dollar value of ripple:native large enough to provide liquidity for this kind of financial system?

Imagine $100 billion of tokenized Treasuries.

Then $500 billion.

Then trillions of tokenized fixed income across XRPL and connected markets.

Imagine RLUSD at $100 billion.

Imagine global currencies continuously moving in and out.

At that point, the amount of liquidity required looks nothing like today's crypto market.

A higher ripple:native price means every unit can represent more dollar value.

That gives liquidity providers more settlement capacity without needing absurd quantities of XRP for every transaction.

That is why I see price and liquidity eventually becoming connected.

The bigger the financial system that XRP is asked to connect, the deeper the dollar value of XRP liquidity needs to become.

The full loop could look like this:

U.S. debt keeps growing
↓
Treasury needs more buyers
↓
stablecoins expand
↓
stablecoin issuers buy more short-term Treasury assets
↓
RLUSD grows
↓
Treasury products become tokenized
↓
XRPL captures more of those assets
↓
global investors enter through RLUSD
↓
more global currencies connect
↓
ripple:native bridges fragmented liquidity
↓
market makers need more XRP inventory
↓
Ripple Prime expands institutional liquidity
↓
XRPL becomes deeper financial infrastructure
↓
ripple:native represents more value inside that system
↓
price reprices higher.

That is the scenario I keep coming back to.

Because the wild part is that the starting pieces already exist.

RLUSD already has Treasury-eligible reserves.

Scott Bessent already sees stablecoins as a potential source of Treasury demand.

The GENIUS Act already created the regulatory direction.

Ondo OUSG already exists on XRP Ledger.

RLUSD already provides an entry and redemption path for that Treasury exposure.

Ripple already committed $10 million to OpenEden Treasury products.

Guggenheim Treasury Services already has Treasury-secured fixed income on XRPL.

BNY already sits behind RLUSD reserve custody.

Ripple already has Prime, Payments and Custody.

So when YTN asks:

“Buying U.S. Treasury Bonds with Crypto?”

I do not read that as some distant fantasy anymore.

I look at the infrastructure being built and think:

What happens when the world's largest government debt market meets regulated stablecoins, tokenized securities and 24/7 blockchain settlement?

And what happens if XRP Ledger becomes one of the rails carrying it?

That is the part people should be thinking about.

Because the real ripple:native thesis may not be about replacing the dollar at all.

It may be about becoming the liquidity layer underneath a stronger, more digital dollar system.

RLUSD can bring dollars onchain.

Tokenized Treasuries can bring U.S. debt onchain.

XRPL can become the marketplace and settlement layer.

And ripple:native can connect that system to the rest of the world.

If that scales into trillions, we are no longer talking about XRP as just another crypto asset.

We are talking about ripple:native sitting inside the liquidity architecture connecting digital dollars, U.S. government debt, FX, collateral and global institutional capital.

That is the scenario I am watching.
You?