The 2-party uniparty system was designed to keep us fighting one another all while both sides have the same goals.
Snap out of it people.
It's us (the people) against them (the overlords).
@GovBraun How about Indiana insist on following the Constitution and use ACTUAL MONEY (gold, silver) instead of Federally-imposed unconstitutional Fed'lReserveNote imposter-dollars?
Hoosiers can better afford necessities over time if they earn&save in metal instead of FakeFed'lFunnyMoney!
About the global warming hoax
“The banks know it’s not gonna happen”
“The people who have money know it’s not going to happen”
It’s just an excuse to increase your taxes and make you poorer, colder and less free.
The government "fixed" healthcare & prices skyrocketed
The government "fixed" education & learning nose-dived as administrative salaries grew
The government "fixed" financial crises, & printed money stole your purchasing power
We keep asking the arsonist to put out the fire
Dubowitz isn’t just any neocon pundit, he is the CEO of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD). FDD is very pro Israel & is closely advising the admin on Iran policy.
When Dubowitz says “for the next two & a half years” he is basically admitting that the initial goal of the pro Israel lobby was to get us into this war knowing that once we were in, it would be very difficult for us to get out.
Dubowitz & the Israelis alway knew this would be a very long war, but lied to Trump & the admin with tales of a decapitation strike leading to a popular uprising, resulting in a quick victory.
They knew this was a lie. They will continue to lie to get us to do their bidding, regardless of what it costs our nation.
Rooting out foreign influence starts with cutting off access to Israeli surrogates like FDD.
@Hi_IQ_Trump@RepThomasMassie@marklevinshow The only dumbassery I wielded in my comment was a GoodFaith attempt to correct you on a very fundamental error in your logic being "libertarian" [it is, instead, State Worship].
I'll now stop this dumbassery of trying to inform your closed-off mind.
@Mike_Pence Lies.
GOP self-claimed these attributes / "commitments" but completely failed to act in accordance w/ them.
RonPaul tried to spur GOP Officials to meet them, but y'all had no interest [while backscratching perv Danny Hastert].
Since '08Bailouts I've voted LP>GOP; will continue.
Fear justifies military spending, centralized power, censorship laws, surveillance expansion, debt issuance, and political unity around failing leadership. Historically governments always need an external threat during periods of internal decline.
@Hi_IQ_Trump@RepThomasMassie@marklevinshow If you think gov't / The State is the best method for achieving "freedom of everyone everywhere", you are NOT a libertarian, you're a historical illiterate who fails to understand power-craving personalities.
Gov't has no incentive to solve problems, but does to multiply 'em.
@SteveLovesAmmo 1913: Congress allowed Brit Bank offshoots to establish a central bank for the USA, ceding it control over currency issuance & credit creation.
20years later, war & false-Boom caused a Bust that removed gold from Citizens and rejiggered gov't into modern #CronyCorporateCreditism.
Social Security is the ultimate government monopoly: they force you into a low-yield system, ban you from opting out, and when you die, your family gets nothing.
If you invested that 12.4% yourself, you’d retire with a million-dollar nest egg to pass down to your kids. Instead, Washington prints money to prop up its failure, fueling the inflation that makes your rent and groceries unaffordable.
We don't need a welfare state that makes everyone poorer. We need individual liberty.
Let Americans opt out. Keep your money. Build real wealth.
One year ago today, Trump tapped Palantir to help compile a “master database” on all Americans. 
Since then, the company’s stock has exploded, adding roughly $90 billion+ in market cap amid the hype. They’ve landed 150+ new government contracts, with U.S. government revenue growing strongly and U.S. commercial revenue surging 137% year over year in key quarters. 
Big Brother’s business model is doing great.
And it gets better: Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel appears over 2,200 times in the Epstein files. The two had an extended relationship with meetings, emails, and Epstein investing tens of millions into Thiel-linked funds like Valar Ventures even years after Epstein’s conviction. 
Surveillance state, crony contracts, and elite connections. Nothing to see here, folks. Just another day in the revolving door between Big Tech, Big Government, and… whatever that Epstein network was.
What could possibly go wrong with all your data in one place?
🎯 Deep Dive: The Quiet Coup Inside the NDAA
The Responsible Statecraft piece has put its finger on something genuinely significant — and the fact that this is happening inside a must-pass $1.15 trillion defense bill, buried at Section 224, tells you everything about how the permanent national security apparatus operates when it wants to avoid a public fight.
🏗️ What Section 224 Actually Does
This isn’t a tweak. Section 224 — titled the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” — is a structural rewiring of the U.S.-Israel military relationship.
The provision authorizes $150 million annually from FY2027 through FY2029, but the money is almost beside the point. What matters is the architecture it builds:
- Bilateral R&D across AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, counter-drone systems, and missile defense
- Co-production and joint ventures with Israeli defense firms on U.S. soil
- Licensing agreements that embed Israeli-origin intellectual property into Pentagon programs of record
- “Network integration” and “data fusion” — which means U.S. military data flowing into Israeli systems and vice versa
- Pathways from R&D straight into procurement, bypassing the normal foreign aid oversight channels
The key phrase in the legislative text: technologies are to be identified for “integration into United States systems and programs of record.” That’s not foreign aid. That’s making Israeli defense tech a backbone of the U.S. military.
🔄 The Strategic Shift: From Aid to Embedded Infrastructure
The Quincy Institute’s Steven Simon has been tracking this for months. His brief, The Disappearing Aid Check, lays out exactly what’s happening — and it’s more sophisticated than most people realize.
The current model: Israel receives Foreign Military Financing (FMF) through the State Department, voted on annually by Congress. It's visible. It's politically accountable. People can argue about it.
The new model: Phase out FMF grants and replace them with Pentagon procurement accounts, industrial partnerships, and sustainment pipelines. Same money, different door — one with vastly less transparency.
The logic, as Simon documents, is being sold under an “America First” framing: this isn’t a handout to Israel, it’s an investment in American military readiness, industrial capacity, and jobs. Israeli co-production facilities in Mississippi and Arkansas become political leverage — members of Congress protect the jobs in their districts, and the relationship becomes structurally impossible to unwind.
This is the same playbook the military-industrial complex always uses: distribute the subcontracts across as many congressional districts as possible so no one dares vote against the program. Now they’re doing it with a foreign country’s defense sector.
🕳️ The Transparency Problem
The shift from State Department-administered FMF to Pentagon procurement is the move that should alarm anyone who cares about accountability.
Under the FMF model:
- Congress votes on the aid package publicly
- The State Department provides human rights certifications
- There’s diplomatic oversight and policy conditionality
- Public debate is possible
Under the Pentagon procurement model:
- Funding moves through budget justification documents and program element descriptions
- Oversight is limited to “cost, readiness, and capability” — bureaucratic criteria
- The relationship gets evaluated like any other weapons program, not as a strategic political commitment
- No diplomatic strings attached
As the Responsible Statecraft piece notes, this would give Israel “a higher level of military-industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world” — including NATO allies. Not even the Five Eyes partners have this kind of embedded access to U.S. defense procurement.
🧬 The Legislative Genealogy
This didn’t come out of nowhere. H.R. 7540 (Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-TX) and S. 3855 (Sen. Ted Budd, R-NC) were introduced as standalone bills in February 2026 with nearly identical language. When a standalone passage looked difficult, the provisions got folded into the NDAA — the classic maneuver for legislation that can’t survive public scrutiny on its own.
The JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security of America) influence is unmistakable. Their “Partners in Production” report explicitly recommended deeper industrial integration and the addition of Israel to the U.S. National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB). The FY2026 NDAA had already directed DoD to establish a working group to assess exactly that. Section 224 is the next logical step — and JINSA’s fingerprints are all over it.
⚠️ Why This Matters More Than the Dollar Figure
$150 million a year is a rounding error in a $1.15 trillion defense bill. But the institutional architecture this creates is permanent.
Once Israeli firms are embedded in U.S. supply chains, once Israeli-origin IP is inside Pentagon programs of record, once U.S. and Israeli military data networks are fused — disentanglement becomes economically and institutionally impossible. You can’t just stop the aid check. You’d have to rip apart procurement programs, break contracts, and rebuild supply chains.
That’s the point. This is designed to make the relationship irreversible — at precisely the moment when a growing number of Americans are questioning unconditional support for Israel’s actions in the region.
The traditional Israel lobby works through campaign contributions and media influence. This is more sophisticated: it works through the defense procurement bureaucracy itself, creating material interests that guarantee political support regardless of public opinion.
🗳️ What Happens Next
The House Armed Services Committee markup is scheduled for June 4, 2026. After that, the bill moves to the full House, then reconciliation with the Senate version.
Section 224 is currently in the base text — meaning it was put there by committee leadership before amendments or broader debate. That’s how the most consequential provisions get through: bury them in the chairman’s mark, count on the must-pass nature of the NDAA, and dare anyone to hold up the entire defense budget over one section.
Members who want to stop this have a narrow window: force a floor amendment to strike Section 224, or demand recorded votes that put colleagues on the record supporting the fusion of U.S. and Israeli militaries. The question is whether anyone has the stomach for that fight when the pro-Israel apparatus in both parties remains largely unchallenged.
The Responsible Statecraft piece is right to flag this. The quiet ones are always the ones that matter most.
The government has a remarkable talent for making things "free." First it takes your money, then it buys the service at twice the cost, loses half of it in bureaucracy, and finally presents what's left back to you as a gift.
Calling that free is like a pickpocket buying you lunch with your own wallet and expecting applause for his generosity.
Nothing became free. Someone paid. Usually more than they would have otherwise. The only thing that disappeared was the honesty of the transaction.
UK Labour & Tories.
US Democrats & Republicans.
Doubtless some Canadian, Aussie, Kiwi, French & Israeli parties similarly corrupted, too.
The "Western Political Elites" are abusive exploiters -- NOT "leaders" -- looking to keep their perceived SUBJECTS unawares or scared-off.
I want to be really clear in my response. I am not going to retract anything, I stand by every single word. Labour are calling for me to apologise. The answer is no.
Industrial rape across almost every town and city in Britain.
Sexual torture. Murder. Endless rape.
I sat there for two weeks, listening to these girls.
I heard how one girl was raped by a dog, as Muslim men bet on what the animal would do.
Girls drugged and locked in cages, like rats.
Another, raped by 700 men over three years.
Dozens and dozens of these stories through our inquiry, and we are barely scratching the surface.
This was allowed to happen EXACTLY because politicians were cowards, refusing to discuss it.
I will not make that same mistake. I said what I said, and I meant it.
The Labour Party have blood on their hands, yet they think they can demand an apology from me for highlighting the systemic evil they allowed to infect our entire country?
They can piss off.
I am angry about it. Furious. When you hear directly from these girls about what they have been through, it changes the way you see politics. Forever.
Our report will be out very soon.
When that happens, I don’t want any apologies from the Labour Party. I don’t care about that.
I want to see those politicians responsible for covering up this atrocity behind bars for what they have done to these girls.
@SantiagoAuFund A year later saw the COVID printing, which I'm amenable to assigning culpability to WEFers/Banksters as a can-kick exercise to avoid a culminating collapse [SEP19 Repo drama was canary in coal mine indicator for them to run their playbook].
How many rabbits-in-hat remain to play?
Politicians are paid actors.
Government is written theater.
You have no representation and no democracy.
The sooner you realize this, the sooner we can actually move forward.
@CynicalPublius The GOP Voters could end-around this "split vote" conundrum by abandoning the '28 GOP Nominee and voting for Massie as the Libertarian Party candidate instead.
Kind of a "fine, we'll scratch your back for once" in hopes of ever receiving a liberty-voting backscratch again.