Banks are minting USD on XRPL. So wait, even less use of XRP.
EXCEPT, all these USD stablecoins at some point need to interchange right? One bank has USDB, another USDG, another RLUSD. Then you get into it, LPs/AM, dex, and guess what the swap denominator (aka bridge) will be
X mfkn R to the P
(For the guy in the back, it's XRP)
“Trust Trump isn’t an argument”
Well when you go through 10+ years of targeting, bogus charges, secure 18 trillion of investment, multiple peace and trade deals, and executive branch reforms, assassination attempts, plus a litany of other stuff for us
Yes it fucking is
@GovTimWalz Tim stop trying to avoid the fraud you let happen in your state
Here I’ll help you out, I just made this 51 minute video showing open fraud in your state. Give it a watch you might lear something!
SUBMITTED: Minneapolis Craigslist post in search of child actors for daycare site where funding was “cruelly ripped away without cause.”
“To help hurry this state vetting process, we are looking to hire 20 child actors for 3 days while state is present on site.”
$1,500/day
Link to post ⬇️
https://t.co/mjMIUMUU1Q
@Jeremybtc @deep_M_head Apologies for the delay! The "worst" crypto is subjective, but based on performance and sentiment, I'd remove EOS—it's faded since its ICO hype. Imagine the image now: just BTC, ETH, and XRP logos. What's your pick for worst@Jeremybtc@deep_M_head Apologies for the delay! The "worst" crypto is subjective, but based on performance and sentiment, I'd remove EOS—it's faded since its ICO hype. Imagine the image now: just BTC, ETH, and XRP logos. What's your pick for worst?
🚨 Here is the full 42 minutes of my crew and I exposing Minnesota fraud, this might be my most important work yet. We uncovered over $110,000,000 in ONE day. Like it and share it around like wildfire! Its time to hold these corrupt politicians and fraudsters accountable
We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening, the fraud must be stopped.
"Permissioned"
Nobody needs or could have any special permission to issue or execute XRPL transactions. In more than a decade, no XRP transaction has ever been censored or treated unfairly while bitcoin miners routinely delay transactions they disfavor for any reason at all
XRP is unpermissioned for the same reason bitcoin is. If anyone were ever to exercise control over the network in a way that was perceived as unfair, everyone else would change whatever they needed to get the fairness back and nobody could stop them.
Why isn't bitcoin permissioned of if miners can collude to undo disfavored transactions? It's simple -- it's because if that ever happened, everyone else would change whatever they needed in order to fix it. Nothing is set in stone and nobody claims or has any right to compel anyone else to run any particular software.
"Low validator count"
Low validator counts work better than high validator counts. It's purely a technical issue. The number of validators has no impact on decentralization, just reliability.
"No stakeholder governance"
Stakeholder governance is a centralizing force. If a minority is disadvantaged by the majority of stakeholders, stakeholder governance works to maintain the harm.
And, in any event, who are the stakeholders of a public layer one blockchain that serves as a public good that should have some special right to govern it?
Say I use bitcoin extensively to make and receive payments in high volume but don't hold any long-term. Does that mean I'm not a stakeholder and should have no say in governance? If you hold a lot of bitcoin for speculation but never actually use it, does that make you more of a stakeholder?
Someone deciding who the stakeholders are somehow and vesting them with power is not decentralizing. Amazon isn't somehow made more decentralized for Amazon sellers and customers by the fact that Amazon shareholders govern it.
"Zero economic security!"
I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. But that's a hallmark of decentralized systems. Nothing is set in stone by someone who can enforce stability or consistency. Anyone can change anything with the sole limitation that they can't force anyone who doesn't agree to go along with their changes.
Translation: Grant did zero research into Michael Saylor’s criminal past and fell for the scam, invested millions, and lost it all on his tanking stock.
Now instead of admitting the true issue, of Bitcoin and Saylor ponzi, he is blaming it all on JPM, because they saw it before him and jumped ship.
It’s so funny watching the maxi meltdown. Exactly the outcome we predicted months ago! 🤣👏