Pretty much what i suggest in my post pinned on my profile December 6, 2024. Sorry it's long & this is longer...just FYI
As each black hole feeds & becomes larger it, in my opinion, presses on the very fabric of space that is supporting it. I don't believe it's dependent on the size of the black hole more the strength of the fabric of space.
If the space is pushed & pulled during a massive feeding frenzy by a particular black hole the fabric around it is weakened significantly. If there are long periods where the black hole lies dormant ie: not feeding. The fabric of space around that black hole had time to strengthen. This is how Ton-618 might have been able to get so large?
The specific reference that no to particles can be in the same place at the same time is easily addressed by Hawking radiation. This allows also for matter to be "destroyed/converted" without violating our current understanding of the laws of physics. At the event horizon Hawking radiation is seen escaping something seemingly inescapable.
The laws of physics are congruent with the notion that for the incredibly small it would be the same just impossible to gauge & so it is. Therefore the quantum realm allows for the switch from the unimaginably large to the unfathomably tiny without ever giving out its secrets as to how that happens yet we see it as the black hole gobbles up & gives off the telltale sign of Hawking radiation.
It's what happens after when the black hole becomes unable to be supported by the weakened fabric of space in this time? Who knows Black holes could be the reason that all of space is being pushed pulled & stretched? Maybe not, maybe that's just my own thoughts on the subject that's way off?
I'd argue though that once as black hole is ripped from this time where space has simply let it go could be detected. We would only need to look for massive amounts of Hawking radiation left behind where there is an empty part of space. This could be something to look for. Tasking a search for large amounts of Hawking radiation where nothing else exists would be a clear indicator that it's possibly once where there was a black hole.
I would also argue that this is simply not something that occurs frequently, more so, that it may not have occurred in our universe more than once so far with our own big bang! If this is the case then it truly is a rare thing indeed. However if this evidence can be found then we just might have the smoking gun. Hawking radiation being the smoking part & the lack of anything in the middle of that radiation field being the gun part.
I only write this because it makes for a nice closed loop that would also arguably simply clarify the what, where, when, why & how that surrounds our creation & in Trillions upon Trillions of years might be our demise.
If once the black hole rips from this time line or point it's balanced precariously on in space then it would seemingly wiz about in a sub space or different dimension to maybe one day, time being irrelevant given it's moving faster than light, pop back into existence. Yes there is a lot to unpack there...!
So lets assume that the black hole is a small speck smaller than an atom with all the matter it has gobbled up over the years. Now assume it's traveling faster than the distance all the light in our universe has traveled in 13 billion years in a Trillionth of a second. Wow that's fast. Imagine now if you will two of these smack into each other just by sheer chance & the Big Bang is formed.
Now if all these black holes in our universe have to eventually link up & one eventually swallows the other then this is going to take a while. So it may have only happened once & that was our big bang? It might happen again any second now...nope ok we're good. It's not to say this is correct or even mildly correct yet it would put in place the simplest answer as to where does all that matter go when its absorbed into a black hole.
It is possible that each black hole is the beginning of a black planet that eventually becomes a totally new universe so far beyond our ability to see that its Trillions of light years from the very edge of what we think we can see now.
So all in all good news however not so good if we want to see it as the average human lives somewhere between 0 & 112 years maximum. This all seems incredibly cruel as the average Sun like our own lasts 10 billion years so we should at least get a million years to live, right? I for one would like to know a hell of a lot more. I'd like to be able to explore out entire solar system as we wiz about the sun. 20 years to get an education 40 years to afford the meager life we all live assuming nothing goes wrong & 20-30 in which we can do very little comfortably doesn't seem right.
So for the dreamers & the designers I urge you all get to it & do it fast as time is the one commodity we can all ill afford.
Pantheism or philosophical, religious belief the universe & divinity are identical is something we dont share. My understanding of physics doesnt provide evidence of it. In the 18th century humanity thought differently, accepted.
Although quantum panprotopsychism may have some fundamental science offerings towards a solution to the combination problem. I feel this is a very human centric need to resolve our inability to solve a problem by saying you just gotta have faith.
Personally I feel it's the point where the human spirit was broken & said let's not use physics because we are not understanding the results & let's just say it's all part of the bigger picture on the quantum scale that we don't have a complete understanding to just yet.
So when people say they see tapping into another realm it's just they no longer have a grasp on their understanding & enter a deity or higher power. Again this is where I diverge & keep looking. If we'd left everything up to a God we wouldn't have the light bulb. We wouldn't have anything for that matter & we'd still be roaming the land looking for our next meal.
Humans are an oddity of that there is no doubt we are not God & we are not part of a hologram nor a projection. We are a physical being that's just barely understandingbour environment like the single cell splitting for the first time. Like a child learning to read. A sponge absorbing water if information was the water. We know nothing but we know enough to keep going.
Rework is one of the most delicate and important things we have to do. Heating the boards to remove components is a real pain in the ass, mainly because some of these boards have giant copper heat sinks on them.
We brought this in-house because we had way too many issues with rework being done externally. Sometimes, itβs worth the capital investment just for the quality. In this case, it was definitely worth it for the cost savings as well.
Just based on your comment it gives me the impression we are far smaller than we know. I feel the observable universe is not even .00001% of what's actually out there. Intact you can put any number of zeros in front of the decimal point if you like.
Just because we can't see any further doesn't mean there's nothing there. I believe it goes on forever in much the same way as we currently understand what we do see.
For me it's like going for a drive. Just because I can't see a destination doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If that were true we'd all starve unless we lived right next to a supermarket.
See based on what we know of the universe around us it's logical to assume it continues on forever. No bubbles, no weird science, no extenuating circumstances.
Just stuff coalescing to create stars & depending on circumstances collapsing to create black holes to hover up stuff over & over again. Obviously I'm simplifying the above some what but you get the idea.
See Einstein's theories make a lot more sense when he refered to spooky science & particles behaving the same no matter the distance between them. There is a subtle delay but this might be the driving force bringing two back holes together under the 'fabric' of space we spoke of earlier. Creating a big bang in a part of empty space to far away to see. Like marshmallows falling into a jar with no walls.
BTW, all of what I've been doing is supposed to be part of a collective effort, so anyone who wants to take a piece of the work and help develop it, such as specific subsystems such as energy, heat management, ECLSS, hull materials, networking design, etc, etc, welcome aboard!
X-59 goes through the number! Congrats to the @NASA and @LockheedMartin𦨠teams!
At @NASAArmstrong , we are rebuilding our X-plane portfolio and getting NASA back in the business of radical airframe and engine flight test!. Today was another small step in the right direction πΊπΈ
Solar panels are getting the bus bars epoxied down. We will have a bunch of small modifications like this as we continue testing.
The issue here, as I highlighted a few weeks ago, was due to the fact that it is almost impossible for us to get the bus bars perfectly straight. So we could see some curvature. Weβre not sure this would even be a real issue, but the solution was so simple that we went forward with the fix.
We are putting dabs of epoxy under the copper before we cover it with Kapton tape.
Ok, let's not use the term 'pressing' in the traditional sense as we might perceive it. More so the growth of any black hole might exceed the capacity for that portion of space to match the speed of growth of a black hole in it's current GR state therefor it opens or rips or tears or a quantum fluctuation occurs.
Lets say or assume it is due to all the atomic structures being absorbed or pulled apart on the atomic level to the point, when viewed from a safe distance, we see the radiation of the atoms being torn apart as the electrons & protons become detached they give off the radiation known as Hawking radiation.
Again as I said going through such changes as we don't currently understand the changes below the nuclei of an electron or photon is where GR lest go & something else happens but the theory of energy not being destroyed only converted into something else is safe. As we see it as Hawking radiation.
So the 'press' as you put it is lazy wording or for want of a better understanding on my part as I don't profess to know at all. Lets call it an educated guess using the educated part very loosely indeed. So although I am not messing with Einstein nor any of the other well known physics I do offer up a very real possibility as to how we can search this hypothesis by looking for large amounts of Hawking radiation as it supposedly doesn't decay or have a half life. So if we search & find no black hole but a large amount of Hawking radiation where a black hole should be then ta-da...
A Guinness World Record! β π
The TeraByte InfraRed Delivery (TBIRD) system designed and developed by @NASA and @MITLL achieved the fastest data connection between a satellite in orbit and a receiving station on the ground. https://t.co/A2F8EOA6Kz.
True the physics is where it's at. Although you can't have physics without the maths although you can have just mathematics on its own. It doesn't mean much or really anything for that matter. So in a small way they go hand in hand but it is as you say the Physics is the predictor or determinant.
I think every single planet & moon in our solar system needs to be thoroughly investigated leaving no stone unturned.
We really know nothing about all of them other than the Moon & Mars. Only one of those have we been to. So we really should have boots on or have at least been in orbit of the rest for a month or so.
Yeah on this I can only see the upside. What ever needs doing should be done. It really is a great idea.
A multiple satellite system in orbit acting as relay & repeater system. The landing or payload delivery should be over at least 3 different locations to ensure maximum success.
All equipment should be recoverable & re-chargeable so a sub can resurface then re-charge then re-engage mission. Or we build it big & go nuclear. I'm all for that!
Re-surface is mostly for data dump & transmit back to Earth. As for the rest it's easy to science...