CLINTEL FOUNDATION @clintelorg - Twitter Profile

Pinned Tweet

3 days ago

You take climate change seriously, support cutting emissions and publish research consistent with IPCC assessments. Then you find yourself labelled a “climate denier”. That happened to @RogerPielkeJr. He studied losses from hurricanes and other weather disasters. Those losses are rising—but how much comes from climate change, and how much from having more people and more valuable property in harm’s way? His findings were not well received. In his lecture at Clintel, he describes the political attacks that followed, including from the Obama White House. He also walks through what the science says about extreme weather. Heatwaves, floods, hurricanes and droughts each tell a different story. And he explains why he challenges the attribution studies behind so many headlines. His full first lecture, recorded on 11 October in Driebergen, the Netherlands, is now online. Around 57 minutes, with clear explanations and plenty of personal experience. Worth making time for. 🎥 Watch via the link in the first reply.

ClintelOrg's tweet photo. You take climate change seriously, support cutting emissions and publish research consistent with IPCC assessments. Then you find yourself labelled a “climate denier”.

That happened to @RogerPielkeJr. He studied losses from hurricanes and other weather disasters. Those losses are rising—but how much comes from climate change, and how much from having more people and more valuable property in harm’s way?

His findings were not well received. In his lecture at Clintel, he describes the political attacks that followed, including from the Obama White House.

He also walks through what the science says about extreme weather. Heatwaves, floods, hurricanes and droughts each tell a different story. And he explains why he challenges the attribution studies behind so many headlines.

His full first lecture, recorded on 11 October in Driebergen, the Netherlands, is now online. Around 57 minutes, with clear explanations and plenty of personal experience. Worth making time for.

🎥 Watch via the link in the first reply.

4

22

12

2

1K

ClintelOrg retweeted

Rosita Díaz

@RositaDaz48

1 day ago

BREAKING: THE BIGGEST CLIMATE SCANDAL IN AUSTRALIAN HISTORY The Albanese Labor Government has just been caught red handed. New forensic evidence suggests they are using a compromised Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) to fabricate a climate crisis that simply does not exist. A explosive forensic audit led by investigator Tom Berger and retired scientist Geoff Sherrington has uncovered widespread, systematic errors and fake readings within the BOM’s raw climate data. We aren’t talking about minor glitches, we are talking about copy and pasted data designed to make the past look cooler and the present look warmer. The audit exposed blatant data manipulation at the Sydney Observatory: •The Fabricated Data: Minimum temperatures from August 1907 were found completely duplicated and inserted into the August 1867 record. •The Cover-Up: The Australian fact-checked the National Archives and confirmed this “double-up” does not exist in the original handwritten records. The online data used to justify sweeping climate policies is completely wrong. For years, the BOM has operated on a “trust us” basis. Dr David Evans, the scientist who built Australia’s carbon accounting software, warns that this “secret climate business” mirrors the worst days of fraudulent medical drug trials, where researchers were under immense pressure to exaggerate results to fit a narrative. Labor is terrified of an independent audit because they know their Net Zero house of cards will collapse if the public sees the real numbers. Dr Jennifer Marohasy confirmed that outside of Adelaide, there has been no proper audit of Australia’s weather stations. If our historical data is corrupted with fake inputs, the AI forecasting models used for future planning become entirely useless. The Albanese Government doesn’t want the data audited because the data doesn’t support their narrative. They are destroying our economy, killing our energy grid, and forcing Net Zero targets on regular Australians based on copy and pasted climate fiction. The question is simple, if the records are sound, why is Labor so opposed to an independent audit? https://t.co/nkHqVgQn3O

RositaDaz48's tweet photo. BREAKING: THE BIGGEST CLIMATE SCANDAL IN AUSTRALIAN HISTORY

The Albanese Labor Government has just been caught red handed. New forensic evidence suggests they are using a compromised Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) to fabricate a climate crisis that simply does not exist.

A explosive forensic audit led by investigator Tom Berger and retired scientist Geoff Sherrington has uncovered widespread, systematic errors and fake readings within the BOM’s raw climate data.

We aren’t talking about minor glitches, we are talking about copy and pasted data designed to make the past look cooler and the present look warmer.

The audit exposed blatant data manipulation at the Sydney Observatory:
•The Fabricated Data: Minimum temperatures from August 1907 were found completely duplicated and inserted into the August 1867 record.
•The Cover-Up: The Australian fact-checked the National Archives and confirmed this “double-up” does not exist in the original handwritten records. The online data used to justify sweeping climate policies is completely wrong.

For years, the BOM has operated on a “trust us” basis. Dr David Evans, the scientist who built Australia’s carbon accounting software, warns that this “secret climate business” mirrors the worst days of fraudulent medical drug trials, where researchers were under immense pressure to exaggerate results to fit a narrative.

Labor is terrified of an independent audit because they know their Net Zero house of cards will collapse if the public sees the real numbers.

Dr Jennifer Marohasy confirmed that outside of Adelaide, there has been no proper audit of Australia’s weather stations.

If our historical data is corrupted with fake inputs, the AI forecasting models used for future planning become entirely useless.

The Albanese Government doesn’t want the data audited because the data doesn’t support their narrative.

They are destroying our economy, killing our energy grid, and forcing Net Zero targets on regular Australians based on copy and pasted climate fiction.

The question is simple, if the records are sound, why is Labor so opposed to an independent audit?

https://t.co/nkHqVgQn3O

195

3K

901

180

26K

CLINTEL FOUNDATION

@ClintelOrg

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users