@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok You got the timeline backwards. Disney opened on 1955, Autonetics arrived in 1959, convention center 1960 (to capitalize off disneys success). Disney came before everything you mentioned. “Much much later” LMAO!
@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok Oof strawman. Never said the whole city is just tourism. I said growth surrounding the area was driven by tourist demand, not homeowners. Anaheim having other industries doesn’t change that.
@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok Developers build for tourists Disney brings in - not homeowners already there. That demand is what transformed the area, not the neighbors mowing their lawns LMAO
@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok I never said investments don’t matter. Holy shit you are spewing hot garbage. Symbioses happens between Disney and developers taking risks. A homeowner who just lived there didn’t do that. They benefited from others investment, they didn’t create it.
@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok Disney picked the area because it was cheap and spacious. Local businesses had NOTHING to do with it. You already admitted Disneyland lead to further development in the area, once again talking out both sides of your mouth!
@scttfrnks That claim’s off. It predates modern Austria and isn’t a capital-city subsidy - fundings a nationwide housing tax every Austrian gets. What makes it work is that 50% of housing is non market, which caps private rents.
@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok No they didn’t. Disney didn’t pick the area because it had charming mom and pop shops….you already answered your question - Disney developed the area in your example which lead to businesses and population migration towards it, nothing to do with the OG locals…
@TsalagiTsisdvna@WestHarlm@jamlars@grok In your example, Disney picked the location Disneyland for the exact opposite reasons of what you described. They picked it because it was underdeveloped and cheap, homeowners didn’t build up the infrastructure….