i made this because every claude tutorial is the same demo and never shows you what to actually ship. 27 skill files you paste once: https://t.co/FarT3brGKV free 4-packβs on there if youβd rather test before anything else. what made you stop last time you tried building something?
Creators who only know how to make content are going to feel more pressure.
Creators who understand positioning, offers, pricing, and distribution are going to get more valuable.
The money is moving closer to business skills.
This is the direction that matters: one controller routing work to the right model at the right moment. The orchestration layer is where the product starts to feel defensible.
Somebody hooked up Claude Code to pair program with o3 and Gemini 2.5 via MCP for an all-star coding lineup π€―
- Claude controls the work
- Can call out to Gemini and o3 for tasks and input
- Works around MCP limit by using prompt files
Check out Zen MCP (link below)
@aryanlabde The shipping part is the easy part now. Knowing which problem is worth solving, talking to the person who has it, and staying coherent when the feedback doesn't match your assumptions.. that's the work that was always the work.
The same thing happening to developers is happening to creators.
Building is easier.
Posting is easier.
Editing is easier.
Getting someone to care, trust you, and pay you is still the hard part.
@AlfinCodes The one that doesn't need the conversation to start from scratch every session.
Files it already knows. Skills it runs without being told how. Work it finishes while you're doing something else.
That's the gap between a really good chat and actual infrastructure.
@blvckledge UGC creators can run this same process in reverse: find the brands spending consistently on creator content, then pitch them before they come looking. The ones already running 10+ creatives are never done buying.
@lizwenzelugc Every brand running an AI avatar ad that gets called out in the comments is generating proof of concept for us. The comment sections are doing the pitch we'd otherwise have to make. That's market education we didn't have to pay for.
@lizwenzelugc Every brand running an AI avatar ad that gets called out in the comments is generating proof of concept for us. The comment sections are doing the pitch we'd otherwise have to make. That's market education we didn't have to pay for.
@lorenzo_pravata The hook is only as strong as the brief it came from. A Claude prompt for hooks still needs the product truth, the audience fear, and the desired action loaded in before it can do anything useful. The skill is knowing what to feed it, not just knowing the prompt exists.
@mehrrajputUGC There's a fourth piece worth adding to that mix: the one that filters who reaches out. Content that shows your process, your standards, and how you think about briefs attracts brands who've already pre-sold themselves on working with you. The best inbound arrives pre-qualified.
@thisgirlpppaula The brands discovering this firsthand are the ones generating the most useful case studies right now.
Comment sections on AI avatar ads are doing more to prove the value of real creators than any pitch deck could.
The argument is making itself.
@contentbykellya The TTS format works because the energy is real!! you actually care about the product, and that carries in a way a script can't manufacture π the brief gives you the guardrails, the yap fills them with something a brand couldn't write for you.
@joeparugc Another test that works: read the hook out loud and clock how long before you drift. If you lose the thread before the sentence ends, the viewer already scrolled. The 3-second boredom test catches bad hooks before anything else does.
@UGC_Olivia_ A brand booking you again before the first video settles is a pricing signal worth catching.
Repeat demand at the same rate is a data point. The next contract is where you act on it.
That's the moment to add a retention package to your rate card π
Building something that connects creators to opportunities and managing the expectation gap at the same time... that's the product problem and the community problem running in parallel. The ones who figure out how to set that expectation in the onboarding are the ones that keep both sides happy. Retention lives in the first 48 hours of a new user's experience.
@MarniCreates Four signed partnerships and repeat briefs in the same morning!! that's a system, not luck. The repeat rate is the number that actually tells you the business is working :)
Fewer brands, higher contract value, filmed on location, trip covered. That's not a fluke month... that's what the pricing model looks like when you stop filling the calendar and start selecting what goes on it. The shift from volume to selection is where the income actually changes :)
@yashhq_22 the one that runs when you're not at the keyboard. not the best chat interface, not the fastest model. the one with skills baked in, files it can reference, and a task it can finish without you describing it from scratch every session.
@_avichawla The interface was always the moat. Files, skills, and infrastructure running inside the product, that's the gap between a tool someone demos and a tool someone builds their business on. Open source closes the feature gap. It doesn't close the ownership gap.
@blvckledge UGC creators can run this same process in reverse: find the brands spending consistently on creator content, then pitch them before they come looking. The ones already running 10+ creatives are never done buying.