Number of girls who have been sexually assaulted by transgender people in bathrooms: zero
Number of women and girls (12+) sexually assaulted or raped by men annually in the US: 443,000 to 560,000 victims
Follow the logic.
Women are deluded and naive for thinking predatory and violent men can be kept out of women-only spaces. ‘They can rape you anywhere.’
However, trans-identified men can only be safe in women-only spaces, because no abuser would ever follow them in there.
Any NZ law firm pushing the idea of the ‘right to puberty blockers’ should read the history behind the clinical legitimisation of this bogus treatment https://t.co/WG6qHXIUdn
This is what happens when sports eligibility policy centres a lie.
FACT:
👉🏼Men can never be women.
But once the sports eligibility policy says they can be and are allowed to play against women (unfairly), two outcomes are assured:
1. Female players are either undermined and/or EXCLUDED . They are denied their rightful placings and prizes.
2. Those who object to item 1 are then disciplined and, again, EXCLUDED.
In both cases, these ridiculous “inclusion” policies automatically lead to EXCLUSION.
PRINCIPLE
👉🏼 When your organization centres a lie all grandiose aspirations surrounding #SafeSport and #FairSport result in the opposite outcomes.
#OppositeSpeak is what #GenderIdeology engenders. 🧐
REMINDER
👉🏼Here is my chart encapsulating the claims and addressing them with reality-based facts.
#SaveWomensSports
@RachealMcGonig1@jennymarcroft That’s ridiculous. Sex is observed at birth and put on the BIRTH certificate. And it’s biology, because there’s nothing else on a newborn babe. “Scientific testing” is not needed except in the rarest of cases.
@RachealMcGonig1@jennymarcroft I dunno how to find your submission, but the reason there are no reliable documents for sex is the systematic destruction of reliable sex markers on birth certificates and derived IDs. Before that, it was easy.
Yesterday in New Zealand, public submissions closed for a bill that will hopefully formally define man, women, male and female in law. Since the definition is now contested, and since anyone can self-id, sex-based rights aren't protected in law any more, so this bill will hopefully fix that.
There has been much propaganda and virtue signalling against this bill, not just from rainbow orgs but virtually every NGO with a social media account, even the Ministry for Women (which should be dissolved if they oppose defining what a woman is). Comments are always disabled on these posts, of course. Can't have people actually discussing it!
Much of the logic of opponents falls back to the false belief that sex is not binary, that 'there are as many intersex people in New Zealand as the entire city of Lower Hutt), as well as the idea that having accurate documents and records would cause great harm to transgender people. Currently even the medical system relies on self-reported 'gender', no record of sex, which is totally insane. This actually stops people from getting what they need, like a prostate check reminder for example.
Sometimes I feel like this country is completely ideologically captured when it comes to sex and gender. The medical system, the education system, the government. Everyone's desire to be seen as a good person seems to override their critical thinking skills. So it was great to see a group of biologists from the University of Auckland put forward a public submission that is grounded in scientific reality. The submission references @SwipeWright's paper, Why There Are Exactly Two Sexes (2025), among others.
I tried to submit it to Reddit but of course the post was deleted.
Submission on the “Legislation (Definitions of Woman and Man) Amendment Bill” by Ad Hoc Working Group on Sex Denialism, 1 July, 2026:
https://t.co/dhAm42HmoD
1/ A new article in @Ecology_Letters by a group of evolutionary biologists—pioneers and leading experts on the evolution of sex. (The article is open access, short, and clear.)
"Biological sex is best defined as a binary classification of male and female reproductive strategies rooted in anisogamy, characterised by the production of two discrete gamete types of different sizes."
"We call for a more differentiated discourse on sex, one that separates the scientific conception of biological sex from societal discussions regarding the diversity of gender expressions and identities in humans."
https://t.co/AuWetFZu2J
@MCleaver@BevJacksonAuth “It is time for Peggy Cohen-Kettenis to take full accountability for the tens of thousands of young people who, through her model, embarked on a medical path with often irreversible consequences.”
John Money's concern was intersex infants, not adolescents.https://t.co/kJD0fhbFvy
Devastating article about the Amsterdam gender clinic:
Of the first 105 men in the nineties' trial, there were 12 deaths. Yet the conclusion presented the care as beneficial. Most patients said they were satisfied, so: success. This while a large part of the group (around 70%) was lost to follow-up — a classic way to obscure poor outcomes. https://t.co/86cseBUmMn
The Democrats were led astray by snake-oil peddlers who wore the skinsuit of medical consensus, the civil rights establishment, and an ersatz narrative holding that the Arc of History bends toward the chemical castration and dismemberment of confused children.
It required the mass self-lobotomization of our elites and bureaucratic functionaries to remain in lockstep with the presumed consensus and eventually, the sacrifice of their most basic humanity as they inflicted harms on the vulnerable while earnestly believing and declaring themselves to be heroes and saviors.
It is a story with the awful fatality of myth and is being told piecemeal everyday in non-mainstream media.
If I were an official in any organization, the last people I would go after are British TERFs.
They've already brought down a First Minister, forced the government to acknowledge that women are female, driven Stonewall to the brink of bankruptcy and gotten gender critical beliefs protected under British law. Why would you even f**k with them?
“Considerations for social inclusion have greater priority than concerns that may exist with respect to competitive advantage in relation to the participation of gender diverse players” - AFL gender diversity policy
So do “social inclusion” for men in dresses on the mens team 🤷♀️
Bluesky is a parallel universe. Over there it is a *bad* thing that a woman in the public eye who is defamed has the resources to defend herself. And they think they are the good guys. lol.
USA Ultimate has separate men's and women's divisions, but then they allow anyone and everyone to participate in whichever division they wish, rendering the existence of those divisions meaningless and essentially turning the women's into a men's B division by default.
1. Team puts boys on girls' team. Boys win team national championship every year.
2. Team puts boy on girls' team again this year. Team in finals and winning.
3. Boy sits on bench to rest. Team immediately starts losing.
Women's sports exists because women asked for a category that males could not enter.
That was the entire point.
Letting biological males into it does not make sport more "inclusive."
It makes the women's category meaningless.
You cannot be pro-women and erase the word "woman" at the same time.
"A victory for all women and girls..."
It was a loss for women and girls and a victory for men and boys who pretend to be women and girls.
The victory for women and girls had to wait six years -- a victory that reversed a loss that you worked tirelessly to inflict on them and prevent them from reversing.