cmo4ever

Husband, Dad, Engineer, Business Owner.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@GoddessRei2 @CoreyBrennanFF I didn't say they weren't. I am saying Men are the core audience for gaming, and if they decide they don't need them at much to sell this by all means.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@GoddessRei2 @CoreyBrennanFF How is it nonsense? Men like to imagine being a powerful man, or looking at a beautiful woman. What is so hard to understand about that?

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@GoddessRei2 @CoreyBrennanFF Yeah, that's the point of media and entertainment. To imagine being someone you're not ( Spartan 117, Kratos, etc.). Men don't want to play unattractive women.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@GoddessRei2 @CoreyBrennanFF Men want to either play as someone they can imagine themselves as (Kratos) or a beautiful woman. Most male gamers are not going to be excited to play an unattractive character model. They can keep learning the same lesson over and over too.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@GoddessRei2 @CoreyBrennanFF The in-game character is much less attractive then she is in real life. Like they nerfed her for the game.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@kitty_bit_games @WorldWarJoe_ No, they aren't. It will join the myriad of games that failed on this concept. And then people will lose their jobs.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@theflowergirl90 @Goorflack Right. They can't make their own thing good enough, so they have to take the fame of a well known male led franchise, get rid of or kill them, to make it work. Because it wouldn't be good enough on its own.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@MoreLimitless @MetalSlimeX Mario has had like a million games. I still want to play Mario in a Mario game.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@spuddgaming @XayStationTV Because they couldn't sell it without the title. That's the problem these piggybacking characters would never be good enough to be their own game without borrowing the title.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@wearecyberpunks Metroid not as Samus or Tomb Raider not as Lara, would be equally bad. People play a franchise for the franchise main character. Similar backlash happened in Halo 5 when they diminished John's role. It's not becuase she's a woman.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@erdbeermilcher Keep that energy when people in fact do not buy it and people get laid off for it.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@UnsytedParasyte If you replace Kratos with Loki, Thor, whoever, you ge the same response. It's not an issue that it's a woman. It's not Kratos.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@HazMattyGaming No, they get upset about a franchise they like being hijacked and replaced with a character other than the main character they got used to for 20 years. Nobody has an issue playing Jill or Claire in Resident Evil.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@NovaSethh Case in point: people lost their shit in Halo 5 because you aren't playing John for the most part. Wasn't an issue of sex, but it's not the character people came for.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@MeghanEMurphy Robots and VR are going to solve a lot of this.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@yacineMTB I mean wouldn't this have to be the case the vast majority of the time?

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@VictorTaelin 2.5 faster and 3.0 cheaper. Changes from x5 to x2 for speed. That seems pretty good

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@realjabart Nobody in that universe is possibly worthy.

[cmo4ever @cmo4ever]

@yacineMTB I know it's a low percentage of actually happening. But I met my wife on this and we had our girl two years ago.