Why was BBC happy to question folic acid being given to 50 million but doesn't comment when it is going to be mandated for 69 million?
Sign the petition below:
What is the difference between your child seeing a man with his willy hanging out walking down the street and a man riding a bike with his willy hanging out? Nothing. It is indecent exposure. We must teach EVERY CHILD that this is wrong to protect them from predators.
@davidicke Spoil your vote. Not voting tells them nothing. To actually walk to a voting office to spoil a vote - its so damming they stopped showing the spoiled count!
@FatEmperor Thanks IC, this cements suspicions further. Greedily & as a sign of preservation we ask "what crypto should we own" 🤣🤣🤣
Keep up the fantastic analytical research!
@shelbystardust https://t.co/GLhKKSMQqO
Already theoretically sound. Problem will be if we need to wait for baby eating pedophiles to fund it - they busy paying for tunnels, bunkers and bombs....
🚨The greatest secret about human consciousness was hidden in Tibetan monasteries for 1,000 years.
In 2020, a dead monk's perfectly preserved body forced science to pay attention.
What researchers found changes everything:
The human body begins decomposing within four minutes of clinical death.
Cells rupture. Bacteria that spent your entire life contained by your immune system start consuming you from the inside. The process is so reliable, so chemically inevitable, that forensic scientists use it to calculate time of death down to the hour. Biology doesn't negotiate with death. It just begins the dismantling.
Except in a monastery in Tibet, where a dead monk's body sat for weeks — skin intact, limbs flexible, no odor, no decay — while the temperature in the room held no special condition and no preservation technique had been applied.
The phenomenon is called thukdam.
And it has been documented not once, not as legend, but repeatedly across centuries of Tibetan Buddhist tradition. Senior meditators — monks who spent decades training the mind in ways Western science doesn't have vocabulary for — die, and then don't fully die. Their bodies remain in a state that clinical instruments cannot classify. Not alive by any measurable standard. Not decomposing the way dead tissue should. Suspended in something that our entire biological framework insists cannot exist.
For a thousand years, Tibetan monks treated thukdam as evidence of something they already knew: that consciousness is not produced by the brain. The brain, in their model, is a receiver. A tuning instrument. And an advanced enough meditator could, at the moment of death, consciously withdraw from the body in a way that slows or suspends the biological dissolution process — because the dissolution itself is downstream of something subtler than chemistry.
Western medicine, for most of modern history, filed this under "folklore."
Then researchers from the University of California San Diego, the Mind & Life Institute, and several collaborating institutions started collecting data. They studied brain activity in meditators during and immediately following clinical death. They documented thukdam cases with controlled observation — temperature logs, clinical assessments, photographic evidence over time. What they found didn't fit any existing model.
EEG readings in long-term meditators at the moment of death showed gamma wave activity — the highest frequency brain state, associated with peak conscious integration — persisting and in some cases spiking during the dying process. In normal deaths, brain activity collapses. In these cases, it surged. As if something was turning up, not down.
Gamma waves in living meditators are already extraordinary. Matthieu Ricard, a French molecular biologist turned Tibetan Buddhist monk produced gamma oscillations during meditation that were so far outside normal human range that the neuroscientists at Richard Davidson's lab at Wisconsin thought their equipment was malfunctioning. They recalibrated. The readings held. His brain during compassion meditation looked nothing like any brain they had measured before. The degree of neural synchrony — different regions of the brain firing in coordinated patterns simultaneously — was categorically different from baseline human function.
What decades of meditation appear to do, structurally, is rewire the relationship between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala, between the default mode network and the regions associated with present-moment awareness. The DMN — the brain's narrative autopilot, the system that generates the internal monologue, the mental time travel, the self-referential loop most people experience as "thinking" — quiets in advanced meditators in ways that are measurably, structurally permanent. Their baseline brain state is closer to what most humans only briefly touch in peak experiences or flow states.
But thukdam pushes past all of that into territory neuroscience doesn't have a map for.
The leading scientific hypothesis attempts to explain it through metabolic slowdown — the idea that extreme meditative states could reduce cellular activity so profoundly that decomposition is delayed the way hibernation delays it in animals. A compelling theory. Except hibernating animals are alive, with measurable heartbeats, measurable respiration, measurable core temperature maintenance. Thukdam monks have none of that. The metabolic slowdown hypothesis requires the biology to be doing something. The biology appears to be doing nothing. And yet the result — preserved tissue, no decay cascade — looks like the result of something actively working.
The 2020 documentation intensified the debate because it forced a specific confrontation: either our model of what biological death triggers is incomplete, or our model of what consciousness is and where it resides is incomplete. One of those two things is wrong. Both cannot simultaneously be right in their current form.
Consciousness remains the hardest problem in science. Not hard in the way fusion energy is hard, where we understand the physics and struggle with engineering. Hard in a more fundamental way — we don't actually know what it is, where it comes from, or why subjective experience exists at all. Why does it feel like something to be you? Why does information processing in neurons produce the experience of seeing red, or feeling grief, or recognizing a face? No one has answered this. Materialism — the assumption that consciousness is simply what brains do, the way digestion is what stomachs do — is the default scientific position, but it has never been proven. It has been assumed because the alternative felt unscientific.
Thukdam is the alternative refusing to stay quiet.
What Tibetan contemplative science spent a millennium mapping — the stages of dying, the dissolution of consciousness through progressively subtle levels, the possibility of remaining in "clear light awareness" after the gross body ceases — reads like mythology until you sit with the fact that the monks who practiced this most seriously produced brain states modern neuroscience is still struggling to explain in living subjects, let alone dead ones.
The monastery was always a laboratory. It just ran different experiments with different instruments over a longer timeframe.
Science is only now building the tools to read the data it left behind.
@carlypearce I couldn't get tickets for the UK Manchester show but if I do get some would be epic to hear 'I will always love you' - safe touring!! Hope to see you live soon!
OMG! Do you hear this? As far as UK is concerned if you are jabbed with THE PLACEBO........you are considered fully vaccinated whether you had the placebo or the actual #clotshot What the heck??????? And he’s still calling it a trial coz it is