GPT-6 Astra is a beast. Give it a Zillow listing. It can 3D model the house based on the listing photos and create a cool promotion video.
The video was just created in one shot and there are still some wrong details. But I am sure it will be much better if I ask it to polish further. OpenAI is so back.
I published my first course in 2013.
It went well.
So I published 17 more in a decade.
Over a million developers watched.
But now that AI is here, authoring another coding course sounds archaic.
GPT-6 Astra is here.
We hope it will begin to enable a new generation of entrepreneurship, scientific discovery, and building.
We believe it is the best model in the world for computer use, professional work, science, coding, cybersecurity, and more.
It took us some extra time to ensure that we could meet the safety and alignment standards required for this capability level, but we think you’ll find it worth the wait.
It scores 98% on FrontierMath Tier 4, 99.9% on ARC-AGI 3, and 100% on ExploitBench.
If you're a "senior" on a team & think you'll have to do 50% of the work yourself, my advice is to do _none_ of the work yourself. Instead, spend your time helping the "juniors" do the work. You'll find the overall work will go much faster because everybody becomes better faster.
My observation is that the people-vs-productivity curve looks like this. The question is where that corner is. I've seen no formal studies, but my guess is that Dunbar's number (~150) applies. Wouldn't be surprised if it was _much_ lower, though. 1/1
"We can't be agile, we're way too big. We've got to adapt it to the 'real world'."
"So, do something about that."
"I just said we're too big."
"Yes, so do something about being too big. What are all those people _doing_ anyway?"