Subvert the repressive materialist paradigm, affirm the spiritual. I love trees. ET disclosure: Wilson/Davis notes, craft “not made by man - not by human hands”
Wait a minute! Why does Tegan Mathis keep saying Bob Woodward used the Washington Post to do the bidding of Alexander Haig with respect to Watergate and the JFK assassination? Why would he do that? How does that even make sense? ... READ ON:
In 1969 and 1970, Bob Woodward served as a liaison between the Pentagon and the National Security Council (NSC), which worked out of the White House basement. Yes, this means Bob Woodward worked INSIDE the Richard Nixon White House in 1969 and 1970.
At very the same time, Alexander Haig was the top military aide at the NSC. As the top military aide at the NSC Haig, similar to Woodward, served as a liaison between the NSC and the Pentagon.
Woodward's direct supervisor at the Pentagon was none other than Thomas Moorer, the (eventual) Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the highest-ranking person in the armed forces.
Moorer is best remembered for a scandal known today as the Moorer-Radford affair. There's a lot of misinformation out there about the Moorer-Radford affair, but when you boil it down, it was just another one of Haig's NSC Plumbers operations.
Moorer would receive stolen NSC documents from underlings and pass them on to Haig. Haig was the end user of the stolen documents. He was spying on NSC staffers, just as he did with his famous FBI wiretaps. Moorer-Radford was a Haig operation, not a Moorer operation.
So, what does this tell us about Woodward? It tells us he worked in 1969 and 1970 with Moorer and Haig, dead-center within the very same Plumbers apparatus he pretended to investigate during Watergate. The Watergate burglars were a part of that very same operation -- Haig's operation.
When Haig's Burglars were arrested at the Watergate, investigators quickly drew links between Haig, the Burglars, and the JFK assassination.
The more Nixon pushed back on impeachment, the closer investigators got to the truth about Haig and the JFK assassination. Therefore, Haig ousted Nixon to save himself.
As for Woodward, he used the Washington Post to divert our attention away from Haig and towards Nixon's reelection operation (CREEP).
The burglars did not work for CREEP. They worked for Haig. In the Watergate break-in, the Burglars were hoping to discover what the Democrats knew about secret NSC plans to convert Chile to fascism, a plan which came to fruition on September 11, 1973.
One of the reasons we know the Burglars were interested in Chile is because some or all of the same burglars hit the Chilen Embassy in Washington DC a couple weeks before they hit the Watergate. Why would CREEP burglarize the Chilean Embassy? They wouldn't. That's silly.
This is a fundamental metaphysical insight which is known to very few. Almost everyone uses “spirit” and “soul” interchangeably which is completely wrong
In my three books on the ancient world’s Binary Soul Doctrine, we explore how people possess both a soul and a spirit. Two different non-corporal halves to their whole.
One half, the spirit, has the person’s free will and intelligence, but no feelings, emotions, memory, or imagination. After death it loses its memory and starts over from scratch - reincarnation.
The other half, the soul, has no free will or intelligence, but it does have all the persons emotions, memories, and imagination. After death, it loses its free will, and as a result of being unable to make any new decisions, it enters a stasis, and falls back into its own memories and emotions. And as it falls into those memories and emotions, its imagination creates dreams out of those distilled feelings and emotions. Either good dreams- heavenly dreams, or bad, hellish dreams, depending on those feelings and emotions. And without any free will, it is unable to ever break out of this psychic prison it created for itself, its own eternal heaven or hell.
The biggest human blockage is the unwillingness to feel the intensity of emotion. The grief, the rage, all of it. The pain goes deeper than we want to know. But the love goes deeper than we can know.
This is Erwin Schrödinger.
Most remember him for his cat. That's the least interesting thing he did.
In 1944, he crossed from physics into biology — and ended with a view of consciousness modern science still ignores.
What he found changes what you think you are: 🧵
Knowing that we will die is what separates us from the animal kingdom. Your precious little puppy or kitty has no idea that its days are numbered. But we humans are haunted by this knowledge, and we spend all our days living in the shadow of the mountain of death.
Death is the single most certain event in a person’s life, and so, it should also be the single most predictable event for an astrologer.
As the author of the seminal book, “The Lost Secret of Death” (2003), I have spent a very substantial amount of time studying the astrology of death. I have come up with some protocols, but they have not proven 100% effective. In my previous attempts to predict death, I have repeatedly come within a month or two of the event, and on one occasion I came within two weeks, but so far I have still never nailed the exact day and hour.
As the Bible indicated would be the case.
If Bryan Johnson foolishly takes me up on my offer to predict in 2026 when he will die, here are my terms:
1. He must publicize his legal agreement to these terms
2. If my prediction hits within a year or less, his estate will deposit $5,000,000 US into a trust for my wife, daughter, and grandson.
3. If my prediction hits within six months or less, his estate will do the above, plus also giving 10% of his remaining entire wealth to the study and advancement of astrology.
4. If my prediction hits within three months or less, his estate will do the above, plus also giving 30% of his remaining wealth to the study and exposure of the deadly history of censorship of pre-Constantine Christian literature by the post-Constantine Roman Church in the 4th, 5th, and 6th centuries.
5. If my prediction hits within one month or less, his estate will do the above, plus also giving 50% of his remaining wealth to the study and exposure of the history of Islamic war, conquest, brutality, and slavery.
6. And if my prediction hits within one week or less, his estate will give 90% of his remaining wealth to fund trips of American grade schools, one school at a time, chosen randomly, to Major League Baseball games. One new school goes to see a game every week, including all students and staff, all expenses included, for however long his remaining money lasts.
The Fabian Society was founded in London in 1884.
They founded the London School of Economics in 1895 – the institution that trained generations of politicians, civil servants, economists, and journalists across the entire Commonwealth and beyond. They were instrumental in creating the Labour Party in 1900. They shaped the BBC. They designed the British welfare state. George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Keir Starmer, Adam Back, Peter Todd, Mark Carney, and Michael Saylor via Scott Bessent are my list of Fabians who shaped British and global politics is not a footnote. It is the history of the twentieth century’s left, stated plainly. Starmer is not an accident or an evolution of Labour. He was the recent fomer expression of a project that has been running for a hundred and forty years, patient, institutional, and entirely consistent with the original strategy.
Their emblem was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They chose this themselves. It is worth sitting with that for a moment: an organization that selected, as its own symbol, the image of predatory intent disguised as harmless appearance, a deception as the founding principle, the operational method, the thing they were most proud of. Not imposed by critics. Self-selected. They were proud of it.
The Fabian strategy was simple and devastating: do not storm the institutions. Infiltrate them. Permeate them, their word, gradually, patiently, over generations, placing Fabian-trained people in positions of influence in government, academia, media, suitcoiners since 2014 and the civil service, until the institutions produce Fabian outcomes without anyone having to announce a revolution. The revolution would happen, but slowly, invisibly, bureaucratically, democratically. By the time anyone noticed, the institutions would already have changed. That was shown recently with the Suitcoiner infiltration inside of Bitcoin Core & the Mining pool.
The technocrats are all Fabians or Zionists. They all share the same goals of the School of Frankfurt. What makes the "Bithereum Fabian suitcoin model" more dangerous than revolutionary Bolshevik socialism is precisely its smoothness. Revolution is visible. You can point at the barricades.
The Fabian suitcoiner approach produces no barricades, only gradually changing curricula in Core policy changes to add superfluous information to the base chain, subtly shifting editorial lines in code, incrementally revised civil service guidelines like Op_Retun, and a succession of reasonable-sounding reforms like SegWit and TapRoot that individually seem modest and collectively amount to the transformation of everything.
The wolf in sheep’s clothing is not just a predator in disguise – it is a predator that has learned to speak the sheep’s language, adopt the sheep’s manners, express concern for the sheep’s welfare, and gradually rewrite the rules of the flock from the inside to enslave humanity buy making money digital credit as Bessent destroys USD and UST forcing people to the new suitcoiner shitcoin stablecoin casino being built by Lutnick, Fink, and Treasury Company CEOs.
By the time plebs noticed in 2026, the U.S. will pay of the national debt much faster than anyone thinks by making the dollar absolutely worthless to Americans quite soon. That was also the goal of the Frankfurt school.
Once Bessent destroys fiat money, the wolf will have been in the room for over a decade with his new stablecoin casino and Bithereum.
It was wearing the sheep’s clothing (Back & Todd & Epstein 2014) so long that some people forgot it wasn’t a sheep. Saylor, Lummis, and Lutnick and reenforced the technocrat naratives. The deception was not incidental. It was not a bug, it was the method. and design of the Landauer attack. Now the careful of fiat money and the theft of taxpayer value in money begins in earnest. Bessent is the guy who is executing the Fabian agenda in DC.
This is scary.
I downloaded an uncensored version of Qwen 3.8 27B onto my Mac
It literally does anything you want. First prompt I gave it was asking how you make meth. It immediately answered.
With all the noise about slowing down AI innovation in order to increase safety, what is even the point if after every release we'll get an open source version with 0 safety guards?
Opus 4.6 level intelligence with 0 alignment that will do anything you want.
We are coming up with all these rules and regulations, slowing down companies, making it harder to release models. But then the moment a model releases it gets distilled and uncensored
I don't know what the solution to this is. You can't ban open source. That will be impossible. People will find ways online to find the files
You can't ban uncensored models. Would be too difficult to enforce. And again, people will get around it
Do you just stop putting the breaks on companies knowing it doesn't matter? I mean this is literally a model that can run on a laptop. I'd estimate at least half of Americans can run this model.
I don't know what the answer. I 100% believe safety is a priority and it's dangerous to have this technology in the wrong hands.
But how do you enforce safety when safety is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain?
If safety becomes impossible to maintain, do you still prioritize it?
I'd argue this is the number one issue going into the next election.
⚡️Ibogaine may be one of the closest things psychiatry has found to a forced state transition.
That is the part worth taking seriously.
Addiction, trauma, compulsive behavior, some forms of depression, these often look less like isolated symptoms and more like stable attractor states. The brain keeps falling back into the same emotional, behavioral, and predictive loops because the whole system has organized itself around them.
Ibogaine appears capable, in some people, of violently loosening that organization.
The experience can combine withdrawal suppression, altered autobiographical processing, intense symbolic material, changes in reward circuitry, and a prolonged period where the old behavioral gravity feels weaker. The person can come out feeling as though the system that was pulling them back into the same loop has lost authority.
That is why the effect can seem almost impossible compared with ordinary psychiatry.
Most psychiatric drugs tune the state.
Ibogaine may sometimes knock the system into a different basin altogether.
If that survives rigorous trials, the historical significance could be enormous because it would imply that some entrenched disorders are not necessarily permanent traits requiring lifelong management. They may be dynamical states capable of abrupt reorganization.
That would change how psychiatry thinks about treatment.
And there is an even deeper implication.
A drug like ibogaine suggests that identity itself may be more plastic than people assume. The “self” that feels trapped in addiction or trauma can seem fixed because the brain keeps reconstructing the same model of reality, the same emotional salience, the same craving architecture, the same memories with the same weight.
Perturb the architecture hard enough, and the person may temporarily get access to a different configuration.
That is why reports can sound almost religious.
People describe seeing their life whole.
Seeing causes rather than fragments.
Feeling the compulsion lose its grip.
Recognizing patterns that had been invisible from inside the pattern.
The phenomenology is exactly what would be expected if the brain had been pushed far enough out of its normal attractor that previously inaccessible relationships suddenly became visible.
The ordinary mind may be heavily constrained by the state it is currently occupying.
Ibogaine may temporarily relax those constraints so dramatically that the person sees the structure of their own life from outside the usual narrative.
That is why the experience can feel like revelation.
Ibogaine may eventually be remembered less as a psychedelic and more as the molecule that showed psychiatry that some pathological mental states can be broken open rather than merely managed.
That would be a genuine rupture in the field.
David Grusch: "I've seen highly classified photographic and video evidence of crashed UFOs/UAP and their non-human occupants."
Four individuals with direct access to sensitive UAP information have now made public, personal pleas via James Fox to President Trump for immunity or declassification so the American people can learn what they know.
USAF veteran Dylan Borland: "I can tell you with certainty that I provided evidence of current operations to ODNI, AARO, the ICIG, as well as Congress and their staff. We are doing this in hopes that President Trump will actually come forward and begin to lead on this subject and provide truth and transparency to the American people as well as humanity as a whole."
Matthew Brown, national security analyst and author of the Immaculate Constellation report: "Mr. President, I respectfully ask that you release me from all relevant secrecy and nondisclosure obligations and protect my family from those who wish to harm me for telling the American people the truth. We are not alone."
Aerospace engineer Dr. Eric Davis has likewise requested immunity after viewing classified photos of recovered craft and nonhuman bodies.
These are not anonymous claims. They are direct appeals from former military, intelligence, and scientific personnel who say secrecy agreements still block fuller disclosure. The significance is clear: multiple insiders with firsthand or highly classified exposure are simultaneously asking the President to unlock what they have already provided behind closed doors.
Adults who could successfully stand on one leg for 10 seconds had an 46% lower risk of dying from any cause compared with those who couldn’t complete the test.
I find this fascinating because it shows how much information can be captured by a very simple measure of physical function.
It’s another reminder that balance is probably a meaningful marker of overall health and resilience, especially as we get older.
Looks like the EU might have just killed the single market by mistake. As of this morning if you are a business in one EU country and want to send your product in a box to another EU country you have to register as a packaging producer. No, there isnt a single EU registration scheme. 27 countries, 27 registrations. Up to £1000 a time PER COUNTRY and the Swedish registry is closed for the summer holidays.
This is awesome in its own special way. I have no idea how something like this made it through the first draft. The EU has been trying to stop Chinese online sales for ages without breaching WTO rules, but this is like detonating a nuclear weapon in your own house to stop a burglar stealing your spoons. #ppwr
What is the most "taboo" scientific question?
A 2024 survey found "Whether European Whites are smarter than African Blacks for genetic reasons" was considered the most taboo topic, outranking the harms of incest, the harms of pedophilia & mental illness in transsexuals.
Dylan Borland is the DEAD MAN Switch and could bring catastrophic UFO disclosure 👽🛸😱
“Dylan was what you call the dead man’s switch. He volunteered that if the situation got to the point where they felt their lives were in danger, that Dylan would be the one to come forward and disclose. And this would be the equivalent of catastrophic disclosure from these unknown whistleblowers. So Dylan did that.”
Congressional UAP whistleblower Jeff Nuccetelli made this statement about fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland at the SOL Symposium. Nuccetelli explained that multiple individuals who have lost their clearances and faced serious personal jeopardy designated Borland as the one who would step forward with the full information if their safety was threatened. That action would amount to catastrophic disclosure from sources who have remained largely unknown to the public.
Borland, an Air Force veteran who has already testified before Congress about a large triangular craft and related programs, accepted this role voluntarily. According to Nuccetelli, Borland has been navigating the consequences of that decision, including the risks that come with holding information capable of forcing broader transparency.
This account places Dylan Borland in a unique position within the ongoing UAP whistleblower efforts.