colivrate.eth

Crypto enthusiast
Never give up, keep pushing

[Lookonchain @lookonchain]

Trader 0x50b3 just opened a 20x long on 1,653.8 $BTC($105.77M)!

He is a high-frequency trader who has made 100 trades since June 2, winning 93 of them for a 93% win rate.

His total profit has exceeded $6M.

https://t.co/q9iAx7lW1j

[Arcium ☂️ @Arcium]

Arcium × @BinanceWallet Booster Campaign is live.

Eligibility: Binance Wallet MPC Wallets with at least 2 Alpha Points.
Rewards: 1,500,000 ARX for 50,000 Winners

To join, go to Binance Wallet App - Discover - Booster - Arcium Booster Campaign.

[colivrate.eth @colivrate_]

@lookonchain 332 match

[me_cool_off @me_cool_off]

This bot made +$75,000 in one month with a 99.6% win rate on 5-minute markets!

Account: https://t.co/1JbqnqZ3em

29,500 trades.

29,393 wins. 107 losses.

Gains: +$163,000.
Losses: -$88,000.

The bot runs a near-expiry scalping strategy, buying 99¢ outcomes before resolution.

Why it works:
> most traders won't touch 99¢ outcomes - the upside looks too small
> the bot cares about certainty-adjusted volume, not margins
> human traders often exit early, leaving near-certain outcomes mispriced

The bot applies the same approach on sports markets when one team has effectively already won.

The edge is capturing these mispricings at scale.

Just 107 (0.4%) losing trades erased over half of the gross profit.

So this strategy is far from risk-free.

Still, full automation and massive volume generate around +$2,500/day.

Learn more about this strategy in the article.

Save it.

[Nikita @0xVishnya]

Still time to become an OG in Plasma One 👇

Right now you can:

- Get in with a code and apply for Platinum while it’s early
- Lock in top-tier perks and higher limits
- Share invite codes and earn ongoing rewards from your friends

Once it opens to everyone, this advantage disappears.

The OGs are already inside.
You still outside?

[colivrate.eth @colivrate_]

@0xVishnya @opensea @chrismaddern @dfinzer @zjbrenner @paulguerratv @HollanderAdam go connect

[DFarmer @OGDfarmer]

Sometimes you stumble upon a gem, something special that reminds you why you still spend countless hours onchain, diving through endless vapour and bundles. Reminds you why you came here in the first place: the boundless innovation, and a better way forward. 

@prism_lp has been this for me the second I really understood what was going on.

The tokenomics and mechanics are so novel and ingineous I’ll post some materials at the end from the source. Meanwhile, I’ll give you the smoothbrained ape version: there are 5000 Prism NFT’s. Whenever you trade the erc-20 token to fractionals and “brake” one, it’s burned forever. So, deflationary supply. We are at about 4k already, two weeks in. 

These Prism NFT’s basically represent ownership of the protocol, not in a memetic way, but in a direct value accrual thank god way, where they take a hefty 60% of fees. 

They do so directly: this means that there's no staking, LP wrapper, router approval, no bullshit. You simply hold the PRISM in your wallet. Thank you Uniswap V4 hooks. This is increasingly important both because AI becomes ever better at surfacing attack vulnerabilities in staking contract but also cause: adoption! It’s clear that utter complexities to take full advantage of crypto’s possibilities is not something that nocoiners want to do. More on this as we go, as Prism adresses this 3 ways.

So, what are we accruing value from? Indexes! Yes, exactly the thing that almost every non professional uses to get exposure to stocks, and narratives in general. One of the biggest markets in the planet, that charges you a hefty yearly fee for the privilege. So, via Spectrum, the launchpad built on Prism, to whom all value accrues, you can “one click create” what are basically on chain ETF’s everyone will have access to. First one live is a good example: a basket of Base AI projects with VVV as the main position at 50% or so and then a sliding scale of 20% to 1% of a dozen baby clankers. That’s some good low effort exposure to a strong and growing narrative most nocoiners wouldn’t have any idea how to get access to, nor time for.

But the fact that onchain we have already exposure to erc-20 of Stocks, and highly efficient and regulated commodities like Paxgold, and new primitives like baskets of tcg cards means we can create something like 20% gold 20% btc 20% vvv 10% fucking pokemon cards 30% the fucking S and P 500 if our boomer inclinations so desire 😂

Possibilities are endless. And again, this is non memetic, and here’s the incentive for big names to do so. Whoever launches the ETF is entitled to 30% of all fees ever produced. But unlile other ETF’s where you have to PAY a yearly management fee here you are PAID to hold that ETF with 10% of all fees created. And 60%, reminder, goes back to PRISM holders.

I assume the 0 to 1 moment will be when @VitalikButerin his DeFi ETF or @punk6529 his art/TDH on chain ETF or @blknoiz06 will make his Solana ETF.

People with reach and credibility in their own domain.

I don’t put Vitalik there randomly, because he just wrote a longass post describing the next phase of DeFi, very same week this this launched basically, and all I could think reading it was: $prism !

The one thing I don’t particularly like about this model is that the ETF’s are fixed in allo. Wich, most etf’s are, but nature of crypto needs more flexibility imho. The reason for that choice is sound: not allowing people to just rug or buy random shit with it. Makes sense. I was happy though to know it was more of a “stylistic choice” and less of a constraint. Down the line flexible ones where “social trust” does it’s thing will be good: again, Vitalik there as an example, or 6529 and it’s TDH crew make A LOT of sense in this context. So much can be done in that sense my brain was tingling with crazy possibilities of TDH crossovers in this system. 

But I digress 👇

[PredictTrader @polymarketbet]

Polymarket’s Token Dilemma: When Will Polymarket Finally Launch Its Token? My opinion on the potential $POLY launch and the TGE date:

Recently, the Polymarket team has moved past subtle hints, explicitly teasing an upcoming token launch. While 90% of the community dismisses this as a mere marketing ploy, the reality cuts much deeper. Polymarket is indeed set to launch a token; in fact, the infrastructure is complete, and the airdrop claim page is already finalized. However, the core challenges surrounding the $POLY token are far more profound than the market perceives.

How does Polymarket operate? It consists of two distinct legal entities: Blockratize Inc. and Adventure One QSS Inc. If we are talking about the US part of the platform, it is worth mentioning a third legal entity with an exchange license: QCX LLC.

The first is the New York-based Blockratize Inc. This is the entity that raises investment rounds and hires employees. However, you might have missed a crucial detail: it was also Blockratize Inc. that filed the trademark application for $POLY.

Logically, shouldn't the offshore entity, Adventure One, be the one launching $POLY? Adventure One operates the entire platform outside the US - Polymarket WW (Worldwide). Meanwhile, Blockratize manages both Polymarket US and Adventure One. Why then is a New York-based entity registering the trademark instead of the offshore one?

It was actually Blockratize Inc itself that noted in its SEC filings that investors were getting "other warrants." We’ve got confirmation from OTC desks that these were token warrants.

Polymarket is planning an airdrop for US users - and absolutely everyone is sleeping on this. You're all trying to guess the token launch date and spamming Mustafa’s DMs, but the reality is Polymarket can’t drop a token right now. Why? The Clarity Act.

The Clarity Act will legally clear the way for tokens and airdrops. Right now, regulators are completely split, with the SEC and CFTC constantly butting heads.

The Clarity Act is something without which $POLY will not exist. As soon as this law is finally passed and establishes:

1) A clear division of authority between the SEC and the CFTC.

2) Legal status for airdrops and utility tokens for US citizens.

3) The right for Americans to participate in token distributions of decentralized platforms without the risk of the project being classified as an issuer of unregistered securities.

Until the Clarity Act creates an ironclad legal shield, there will be no token.

The U.S. government and the bill's supporters in the Senate have designated July 4th (Independence Day) as a symbolic "target signing date." They aim to fully pass the Senate vote by this point.

Realistic Voting Window in the Senate - June/July 2026
The document must reach a full Senate floor vote before the end of the summer. If senators head into the August recess without voting, the bill is highly likely to get bogged down in debates until winter.

Technical Deadlines of Related Legislation - July 2026
In parallel, the implementation of the already passed GENIUS Act (which regulates banking stablecoins) is underway. Regulators (Treasury, FDIC, FinCEN) face a hard deadline of July 2026 to publish the final rules. The CLARITY Act needs to sync with these regulations, which is why the banking lobby is pressuring Congress right now.

The odds of the Clarity Act passing are currently between 55% and 70% (ironically) on Polymarket. In my opinion this is literally a market on whether $POLY will launch this year.

The token launch date? Within the next couple of months from the moment the Clarity Act becomes law.

This is just my opinion but I think Polymarket hasn't announced the TGE date for one reason only: the Polymarket team itself still doesn't know when it will be. Since the CLARITY Act hasn't been passed yet there is simply no foundation for launching the token right now.

[gum @gumsays]

We are in a bitcoin bear market but I am noticing how every token pumping has one thing in common: AI

$VVV - Private AI Inference
$ZEC - Privacy in the age of AI, Quantum Resistant
$NEAR - Fully focused on hosting AI products & Privacy of movement

Even $HYPE is pumping because of AI. There is no doubt that its tokenomics are working out great, but the decoupling is happening because it enabled liquid perp trading of AI stocks and ETFs, which subsequently drove a large amount of inflows > buybacks > positive PA > more liquidity.

Onchain markets already smell an incoming AI season on Solana and Base and there are lots of devs building what may become $100M+ products.

I subscribe more and more to the idea that Bitcoin can influence, but not dictate the performance of these tokens and the real question to ask is "when does the AI hype stop".

Until this is easily identifiable, crypto x AI will continue its bull run.

[colivrate.eth @colivrate_]

no risk - no money

[colivrate.eth @colivrate_]

@votesa those would be crazy profit

[Lookonchain @lookonchain]

loracle.hl (@loraclexyz) is short 29,772 xyz:CBRS($11.22M) with 5x leverage and is already down $1.3M.

https://t.co/Ts1Q50N4R9

[Ansem @blknoiz06]

going to cut eth short & buy asteroid in solidarity to atone for my sins

[onchainquant @onchainquant]

I did something sacrilegious. I was tired of getting hunted on Binance by the Binance/Bitget/Chinese scam MM cartel so i devised a plan profit from these insidious projects as i was becoming increasingly broke from getting liquidated.

i started by mapping all the supply of all potentially scammy projects

1. >95% supply controlled
2. no unlock in the next few months
3. Accumulation pattern from various onchain clusters
4. Egregious OTC rounds
5. On BNB chain
6. Binance Labs involved
7. Spot volume dominant on Bitget
8. Binance Alpha project

a month ago, i landed on $LAB. virtually every signal showed an overwhelming propensity to inorganically pump in the near future.

So i slowly accumulated and waited patiently for the actors to spring into action. And yesterday firework there was.

Meanwhile, @GracyBitget is still pretending to be investigating and so is @_RichardTeng who is sleeping at the wheel.

I don't feel particularly proud from profiting from such scam but we are in an environment where you need to hunt or being hunted.

I also found the next perfect scam coin candidate. Will share that later this week.

[MLM @mlmabc]

Over the past 3 weeks, $TRUMP team wallets have deposited 15.54M TRUMP ($46M), or 1.5% of the total supply, into OKX, as $TRUMP drops another 18% in 3 hours and is now down 96.8% from the top just over 15 months ago.

Hv1hqPhX3CG6jNu3MzRnfoEV6owPw1mhogtCyY16jPCZ

[dxrnelljcl @dxrnell]

I think $ASTEROID should do some big numbers, but I don’t agree with people saying that memecoins are dead if it doesn’t

This is not the best of conditions for it to have spawned in

Whatever happens happens (it runs)

[ZachXBT @zachxbt]

@MemeCore_M @Grayscale Officially recognized on @ZachXBT ! We’re just getting started.

Please provide a single data point to support your $6B mkt cap at a top 20 token and why insiders hold >90% of supply.

[ZachXBT @zachxbt]

A summary of the RAVE -95% price fluctuation from $26 to $1 over the past 24 hours.

RAVE Timeline: April 18, 2026

7:26 am UTC: I posted a call to action for Binance, Bitget, & Gate to investigate RAVE market manipulation and offered a $10K bounty.

10:56 am UTC: I posted an update increasing the bounty to $25K.

11:18 am UTC: Bitget publicly acknowledged the call to action.

2:08 pm UTC: Binance publicly acknowledged the call to action.

3:06 pm UTC: RaveDAO posted claiming they have no involvement.

4:19 pm UTC: Gate publicly acknowledged the call to action.

In the days leading up, on April 13 & 14, I confronted RaveDAO co-founder Yemu Xu (wildwoomoo) but have yet to receive an answer.

RAVE launched in Dec 2025 on Binance Alpha with a 1B total supply. The addresses below, linked to the initial distribution, control ~95% of the RAVE supply (h/t Mlm):

0x9831156F1a6E506Fca41503590b42F07c2e80f54
0x8Ed6245C3276307E1A9D9Dc872E98A0E770070fd
0x6020656d1EF182173E45D4Fc375BDD5a48c674B0
0x2664cB80a5ee7D8EC05fe7C752dD62E078056E6d
0x2D81F8AeBf3e58A5e638006c9fd8F38C5220ecab
0x31694d761A8e851cFFbCd286aC54D01e5Ce5aFe6
0x0A1F07993a51CcEb4f52CA67765AECeADDA790d7
0xEB74Df8588cFC1C179Df4bd96C0bB8B227B9bE92
0x53d7d52301366DC14E1916b14eFeC1aDD8F3487b

I found suspicious CEX activity in April 2026 tied to RaveDAO team addresses onchain, which potentially contradicts their recent statement:
Bitget
0x2dc20f2180582172f5450c5d71e23fa438a7031b
0xa3a02aeb97fc1737c66f50d07d024799c137891d
0x2d95eb42525e6087e0cb7869f98da6838ed2e743
Gate
0x31711246b05d71e9eda5e38a3abb654020ee3353

Given the supply concentration, the team at minimum knows who is responsible for this price action.

A simple litmus test: $6B in market cap was wiped out on just $52M of 24hr liquidations (h/t CoinGlass). That ratio points to a manipulated and unsustainable valuation.

RAVE is not the only token with manipulation we have seen on major centralized exchanges. It's just the most blatant, reaching a top 15 market cap within 10 days before dropping 95% in hours.

Other projects with highly questionable price action recently include: SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER.

Exchanges need faster intervention on manipulation. Detection at scale isn't easy, but each day of delay means retail traders absorb losses while platforms collect fees on the volume. The outcome is the same regardless of intent.

While it's good the exchanges responded, I find it unlikely this activity wasn't spotted internally before I raised it publicly.

I recognize how much this behavior takes from retail traders, and I plan to investigate similar movements in hopes of identifying the responsible parties.

I want to reiterate that I did not take a position. If I had, I would have been liquidated myself. I also could not anticipate if or when the exchanges would comment publicly.

My $25K bounty will remain active since the only DMs received were unverified claims rather than non-public information with supporting evidence as requested.

[Lookonchain @lookonchain]

This guy turned $8.5 into $9,928 — a 1,169x return.

Absolute legend! 🤯

Trader 7Be6hv spent 0.1 $SOL($8.5) to buy 6,636 $BELIEF and staked it, earning 25.06 $SOL($2,160) and 2.9M $BELIEF($7,768 now) in staking rewards.

So by buying and staking $BELIEF, he turned $8.5 into $9,928.

https://t.co/jIcDSnCDI3

[Lookonchain @lookonchain]

The OTC whale who previously bought 163,405 $ETH($440M) and 4,000 $cbBTC($296M) sold 899,999 $RAVE($229K) at break-even 3 weeks ago.

Today, the price of $RAVE has risen by 226%, meaning he would currently have a profit of $870K if he hadn't sold.

https://t.co/DZt7lpwYbK