@Tadimateo@collinvance13@MitchellMGumbo Politics is not for everyone baba, that's the problem with Zimbabwe that people who are better placed as preachers find themselves at the centre of politics
@Tadimateo@zikhali_x@MitchellMGumbo You have confirmed everything here. Hamudi kuti Chamisa anzi atadza. Saka masiyanei ne Zanu PF yacho? Kana muchidai when he is not in power ko akazotonga?
π₯πππππ‘π π±π°π¬ π¬π―π³ πͺπ₯ππ§π§ππ‘ π¦π¨ππ ππ¦π¦ππ’π‘π¦ π πππ‘π¦ π₯πππππ‘π π²π¬π¬π¬ π¦π¨ππ ππ¦π¦ππ’π‘π¦ π πππ¬.
Meditate on this. A committee of 210 parliamentarians reading all 540,037 written submissions, some of which had more than one page, would mean reading no less than 6000 submissions a day or 250 every hour for 24 hours over the last 90 days. Is this possible?
And surely such extensive reading would have made the MP submissions more informed than the shallow submissions we hearing right now. We need an audit of submissions.
This road leading to Zimbabwe's biggest Thermal Power Plant - Hwange Power Station was once tarred. A decade ago, one of the local companies offered to refurbish it and was engaging a private company to do the work. The responsible Ministry gave a directive to stop the planned work as the road is designated as a state road. The company was instead directed to handover the funding it had budgeted for the road to the Ministry which would then fix the road. A few months later a dozen workers from the Ministry turned up with shovels and gravel to fill potholes. That road has never been the same since then, it has become a permanent dust road.
For 210 parliamentarians to have gone through 540 037 submissions in 90 days it means that each MP read 2381 submission. But here is the interesting part, each MP should have sat on a panel so that they could all hear what every submission is saying for them to get the national sentiment. That means reading 6000 submissions a day or 250 submissions an hour for 24 hrs everyday over 90 days. So do we believe that parliament read 540 000 submissions? Itβs practically impossible.
But when listening to these MPs arguing, do they sound like they are speaking from a position of being informed after reading 540 000 submission?