When a scientific hypothesis is retracted, we don’t just lose one paper — we lose progress in science and medicine itself. This affects every single one of us.
@ChildrensHD
We are all future patients. It is the responsibility of every human being to stand against this corruption.
We cannot demand miracles from our doctors while simultaneously preventing them from innovating, questioning, or even forming hypotheses. True medicine dies in silence.
"When a hypothesis is retracted, we've lost science and medicine."
Testifying before the Senate, Dr. Sabine Hazan pointed to her groundbreaking research on the gut microbiome and disease, describing findings she says were later removed from the published record.
"We discovered that severe COVID patients lacked bifidobacteria."
"We also discovered that people with autism, Alzheimer's, Crohn's disease, Lyme disease, irritable bowel syndrome, mental health, invasive cancer lack bifidobacteria."
"We found that vitamin C, bovine immunoglobulin, and ivermectin, a fermented product of a bacteria called streptomyces, could help increase bifidobacteria and restore."
"I wrote a hypothesis. Perhaps ivermectin was improving the bifidobacteria."
"That hypothesis was published and retracted in 2023."
"When a hypothesis is retracted, we've lost science and medicine."
@SabinehazanMD@SenRonJohnson
Senator Ron Johnson is clearly exasperated.
Then Oncology Professor Dr. Angus Dalgleish reveals the real scandal.
It’s how they sold “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated”.
And how they still sell the false claim “millions of lives were saved” by messenger RNA tech.
It creates the false illusion of more covid, more death, more illness in the unvaccinated group.
And all of those classified as unvaccinated, had actually had an injection which temporarily lowers immune cells (Lymphocytes) that protect your body against disease/infection.
DALGLEISH: “When it comes to side effects.. they basically said ‘we don’t have side effects for the vaccine until at least 14 days’ ... because that’s how long it takes an antibody to come.. so all the people who dropped down dead after 1 or 2 days, went down the list as unvaccinated”
Apparently they call this “science”.
Teresa Buckley shared a story about a yoga instructor who became seriously ill after COVID-19 vaccination.
"Why is everyone quiet? Why is everyone silent?" she asked. "Today we’re not going to do that anymore."
"Canadians are suffering... and it's time to hear from them."
Amazing, incredibly important and long overdue.
MP Dean Allison on Parliament Hill today wants an inquiry into Canadians who may have been injured by COVID-19 vaccines.
He is calling on all Canadians to share their stories on how the vaccines and any injuries they caused affected them & their lives. This has been ignored long enough in Canada.
A peer-reviewed paper published in the journal Bioethics (Oct 2025, Wiley) argues that we may be MORALLY OBLIGATED to promote the spread of the lone star tick — the one that gives people a severe red-meat allergy called alpha-gal syndrome (AGS).
The authors' logic, in plain English:
1. Eating meat is morally wrong.
2. The tick stops people from eating meat.
3. Therefore stopping the tick is wrong — and spreading it is good.
4. We can genetically engineer ticks. So we should.
They call this the "Convergence Argument." The title of the paper is — and we're not making this up — "Beneficial Bloodsucking."
If you found this paper on a conspiracy forum, would you believe it was real?
Drop your hottest take below.
Paper: Crutchfield & Hereth, "Beneficial Bloodsucking," Bioethics 39(8): 772–781, 2025.
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.70015
We have sent another letter to FDA again asking it to simply require that all drug ads disclose all risks of the product. Will the @FDACommissioner do the right thing… https://t.co/4bOp71wopd
We have sent another letter to FDA again asking it to simply require that all drug ads disclose all risks of the product. Will the @FDACommissioner do the right thing… https://t.co/4bOp71wopd
NIH researchers have been charged with allegedly smuggling monkeypox-related biological materials into the United States.
Federal authorities say they brought 113 vials through a commercial airport and falsely described the contents to customs officials.
The researchers’ work focused on “emerging viral pathogens” and how those pathogens “cross the species barrier”.
Dangerous chemicals! 😔
BUT…
“Organic milk tested clean, every sample. For a staple kids drink by the gallon, buying organic closes a door you actually control.” 🤍
A scientist was hired by a chemical company to study its weedkiller. He found it was castrating and feminizing frogs. So the company stopped studying the chemical and started studying him. This is the documented story of atrazine. 🧵
Dr. Sabine Hazan: “our most significant discovery”
Dr. Hazan is a Gastroenterologist with a special interest in microbiome research.
Watch as she traces the loss of Bifidobacteria all the way from covid mRNA technology to the rate of Autism in California.... and ends with a bombshell twin study.
@SabinehazanMD brought back the speech of previously non verbal twins, with a re-florilisation of the essential microbe which is now missing (at adequate levels) in 75% of newborns.
It’s a completely new paradigm of medicine.
She is pioneering it.
Federal prosecutors just charged an NIH virologist with smuggling biological materials into the United States.
His name is Vincent Munster. He's not a minor scientist. He runs the Virus Ecology Section at one of the government's premier BSL-4 labs.
This is bigger than a customs charge. Thread 🧵
BREAKING: Study Finds Pediatric Flu Shots are a COMPLETE FAILURE
Study of an ENTIRE Spanish region (~400,000 people) found NO reduction in flu cases or hospitalizations after mass flu shot rollout to children 6 months to 5 years old. How did influenza ever get on the ACIP childhood schedule anyway? Rare side effects such as catastrophic Guillain-Barre Syndrome outweigh any putative benefit. @NicHulscher@McCulloughFund https://t.co/VvSchdnT1Y
However we get there... 🤦♀️
Who would have thought that our country
would defy and deny obvious and common sense approaches to childhood healthcare in favor
of profits?
We must always weigh the risks vs benefits for each individual and always err on the side of caution for any medical intervention, especially for children. Sadly, we have not done either in favor of extreme and ideological medical policy that is not necessary or healthy and can actually be very harmful for some.
But! These extreme policie$ have led to huge profits and growth for large corporate interests. Add in the weird and corrupt aspects of politics - what could go wrong? Unbelievable! 😔
This disaster began in 1986 during a Republican Administration and, hopefully, it can be put to rest now during a Republican administration. It's been a long 40 years. 🙏