Jocelyn Michele

[Dan Albas @DanAlbas]

A few years back, the Auditor General found $59 million went to 10 SDTC projects that never qualified for funding, and 90 funding decisions worth nearly $76 million where conflict-of-interest policies were not followed.

This week, Minister Joly confirmed the Liberal government will make no attempt to recoup roughly $34 million paid to ineligible green technology projects. Her reason: it is "not in the public interest."

Canadians who were overpaid CERB through no fault of their own faced strict clawbacks with no recourse.

Why is there one set of rules for Liberal friends and insiders, and another for everyday Canadians?

There was a time a $16 glass of orange juice was a national story for over a week. Now $34 million is thrown away and several media organizations will barely report on it.

My question this week: Do you agree?

Full MP Report: https://t.co/NBz8RLmlal

[Dan Albas @DanAlbas]

Well said @honjamesmoore:

“But B.C. premier David Eby’s decision to trigger an election campaign less than two years into his majority mandate — without having lost a confidence vote, with no confidence vote on the horizon; after having already passed his budget through the legislature; with only one piece of legislation before the B.C. legislature; while the official Opposition is without a leader; and while municipal elections are underway — is truly one of the more crass, opportunistic and absurd acts of political exploitation that we have ever seen.”

[Ms.BORN FREE 🇨🇦🙏 @LittleMsCujo]

Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet
Sept 20\26

My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering.
I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering.

The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM)

I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure

The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options).
The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield.
The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity.
The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM).
II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122)

Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person.
The Evidence:
Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5).
The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public.
Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard.
III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121)

This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings.
The Strategy:
We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm.
IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element)

To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity.
The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO).
The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship."
Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield).
Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office.
V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea)

The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below:
Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind."
The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes.

This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket."

CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada)
TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
DATE: February 13, 2026
I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION

This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034.
The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure.
Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay.
Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition).
III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA)

COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122)
The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings.
Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest.
COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c))
The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada.
Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject.
IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP

To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders:
Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals.
Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen.
Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements.
V. CONCLUSION

The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold.
I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026.
In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings.
The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis

Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals)

These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions.
The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status.
Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return).
The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts.
Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals)

This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office.
The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF.
Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push.
Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals)

A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program.
Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario.
The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities.
Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals
If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless.
Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals.

If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following;

1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post.
2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP.
3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement.
4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.

[Aaron Gunn @AaronGunn]

The last few weeks have been very disheartening, both as a conservative in British Columbia and, more specifically, as someone who dedicated so much time and energy to growing the conservative movement and the Conservative Party in B.C.

I would like to thank Kerry-Lynne Findlay for her service, both to Canada as a Member of Parliament and as the democratically elected leader of the Conservative Party of B.C.

Running for office can be a brutal and unforgiving experience, and I think it’s important to applaud all those who put their names forward seeking political office.

The NDP are destroying this province. They have flooded our streets with drugs, tripled our debt, and undermined many of our most important industries, institutions, and fundamental human rights.

The next election is the most important in a generation.

Now is the time for all conservatives to come together, put differences aside, unite, and do everything we can to defeat the NDP and bring common sense back to British Columbia.

[Dante Rossi @tvc1five]

Ben Mulroney deserves credit for telling Canadians the truth: Mark Carney is steering the country toward a new European alliance without first seeking the consent of Parliament or the people. Learning our future from foreign newspapers is no substitute for open debate in the People’s House.

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

Canada's billion-dollar state broadcaster wouldn't walk 3 minutes down the street to report on the vaccine inquiry. @SheilaGunnReid and @TamaraUgo break down what the CBC doesn't want you to see from Conservative MP Dean Allison's (@AllisonInquiry).

[Fringe Truth @TruthFringe]

Love him or hate him, @BenMulroney is spittin' facts.

There is NO deal that is possible with the @eucommission that is GOOD for Canada.

#ElbowsUp🤡
#cdnpoli🇨🇳
#EuropeanUnion🇪🇺

[Stephen Taylor @stephen_taylor]

Pierre Poilievre wants to cut $150B of Carney's wasteful spending, including corporate welfare, the Alto high-speed rail project, the bureaucracy, the consultants, and the "fake asylum claimants"

[Brian Lilley @brianlilley]

I love the idea of expanding trade with the EU, I hate the idea of us joining the EU in any way shape or form.

I break down why in this video and in the column you can find at the link below. Definitely there will be more to say on this down the road.

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

CARNAGE: Day two of the Allison Inquiry hears from vaccine-injured Canadians

If day one of the Allison Inquiry opened the door, day two kicked it off the hinges.

I sat down with Conservative MP Dean Allison at the end of the day, and there was one word for what was just heard: carnage.

"I heard gaslit. I heard abandonment,” said MP Allison, reflecting on the relentless stories shared.

Vienna Demeduk described her 20-kilometre morning run cut short by a stroke that left her blind and unable to walk, alone in her condo, dragging herself across the floor toward help.

Nicole Maurier recounted the final hours of her daughter’s life — holding an oxygen mask against her face by hand, before watching her organs fail one by one after chemotherapy her weakened body couldn't handle.

One wheelchair bound victim, Jasmeet Grewal, now lives with two feeding pumps for twelve hours a day, unable to so much as swallow water.

Then there was James Freeland, standing in a hospital hallway, being told his 60-year-old mother — no medical history beyond type 2 diabetes, dead two days after her shot — had died of a "hard hit to the heart." No further explanation, no autopsy, but a rushed cremation that thwarted further scrutiny.

Biostatistician Dr. Jessica Rose brought the numbers to back up what the testimony was screaming. Her slides showed Canada's vaccine injury reporting rate is a fraction of the U.S. rate under VAERS — not, as officials claim, because Canadians weren't injured, but because Canada's reporting system is far more tightly controlled on both ends.

This lines up with what I reported back in early 2021, when Dr. Patrick Phillips — a rural Ontario emergency room physician — had all five of his vaccine injury reports denied by his local medical officer of health. That denial was only the first step in a maze of bureaucracy: a vaccine injury reporting system that is full of layers and gatekeepers.

Dr. Charles Hoffe shared the same sentiment in British Columbia, where physicians were threatened and intimate by their regulators for daring to speak on, let alone document, vaccine injury for fear of fueling “vaccine hesitancy.” He described filing report after report by registered mail, nine pages each, only to have every single one returned marked "coincidence,” without investigation.

Despite the weight of it all and only a small showing of MPs at the inquiry itself, Allison said the response from the Conservative Party of Canada has been entirely supportive, even as questions swirl online about the absence of Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre.

"I know Pierre has been a big supporter of this," Allison said. "His schedule is a lot busier than mine. I believe he'll find time to meet with people."

What struck him most, he said, wasn't the medical detail — it was the fear in every witness who sat down.

"Every single one that came today was saying, I'm nervous about talking about this publicly. I haven't talked about it in three or four years," Allison said. "We've got to make this part of the discussion. People are getting injured. They're not getting better. If we don't talk about it, there's no way we start getting them help."

REPORT by @TamaraUgo:

[Enezator @Enezator]

The best video you can watch today

[Dan Albas @DanAlbas]

Trump is shutting Canadian alcohol out of much of the U.S. market. We can’t control Washington.

We can control whether Canadians can buy Canadian across provinces.

@PierrePoilievre’s letter to Carney is clear: if we’re told to buy Canadian, let Canadians buy Canadian.

With the U.S. ban hitting September 29, Parliament can’t sit this out. End the interprovincial barriers. Pass Bill C-262.

The Carney government should work with Conservatives and make this law.

One market. One Canada.

Let's get it done!

[mybrotherskeeper @mybrotherskp]

PROOF @MarkJCarney HAS SINGLEHANDEDLY SHUT DIWN CANADAS DEMOCRACY!

Former Liberal Party President says it like it is!

Cabinet are Spineless
Cabinet are past leader Has-beens
Cabinet are beholding to Carney
Cabinet has no say
Finance Minister is lying.

Carney calls every shot & nobody knows where these shot are going!

Carney is forcing his own agenda and CANNOT be TRUSTED!!

He has to be removed from the PMO

Wheres the opposition
Wheres the watchdogs
Wheres the @GGCanada
Wheres the law… https://t.co/SrzM0YFbKr

[Jocelyn Michele @condernedCAD]

@MattB_Sails @JohnHol36979953 @brianlilley We don’t even know for sure what the deal was. I’m having a difficult time believing anything Carney says.

[Jocelyn Michele @condernedCAD]

@LikeToGolf1 @brianlilley @MarkJCarney @CanadianPM @CPC_HQ Not on ALL Canadians. But I hope you have learned your lesson and will change your vote. Stop being so gullible. Carney “advised “ JT. That should have told you everything.

[Jocelyn Michele @condernedCAD]

@DanAlbas “Unbiased and fact based”. Which news sources are we talking about here?

[Dan Albas @DanAlbas]

I was interviewed by a journalist about wildfires the other week and I mentioned that arson was a growing concern in the Okanagan. Immediately, I was challenged on that point, as if I was misinformed or spreading allegations that were untrue.

We must be alert to this threat, report and charge anyone who literally is playing with fire- as the consequences are serious to life, property and the environment:
https://t.co/tEfJKMlxOT

[Nana0000 @Nana00018487212]

Canada deserves better — and this one is on the Liberals.
No more spin. No more deflection. The 50% tariffs are live. Tens of thousands of Canadian jobs are at risk. Businesses are already calculating closures and layoffs. Retaliation will raise costs for our own consumers and firms. That is the reality.
Trump is not the enemy. He is doing what every Canadian government claims it wants to do: protect its own workers, industries, and leverage. The American economy has outperformed ours for a decade. Look at the record. Before the Liberals took office, Canadian and U.S. living standards tracked more closely. Since then, U.S. per-capita growth continued while ours stagnated. Investment fled Canada by more than a trillion dollars. Productivity lagged. Capital stayed on the sidelines because the regulatory and policy environment became hostile to building and scaling.
You cannot negotiate from weakness that you created. You cannot spend eleven years adding barriers, uncertainty, and capital-killing rules, then act shocked when a hard-nosed counterpart treats you accordingly. Late talks, competing stories about the final offer, limited transparency, and another round of temporary supports do not fix the underlying problem.
Band-Aids on structural damage do not restore competitiveness. Matching tariffs while admitting they will hurt Canadians is not a strategy — it is damage control. The Liberal record on investment, growth, and living standards is the reason Canada entered this confrontation already behind.
Canadians are not asking for excuses. We are asking for results. The data is public. The job losses will be real. The costs will land on ordinary people.
This is on you.
Canada deserves better

[🌸🌺 🅴🅻🅻🅴🥃🦊 @WhiskyThaFox]

Here:
There’s a reason a lion doesn’t wake up one morning, look across the savannah at a 12,000-pound elephant and think:
“Today’s the day I teach that bastard a lesson.”

It’s not cowardice.
It’s understanding leverage.
The elephant is bigger.
The elephant is stronger.

And your motivational speech about standing up for yourself doesn’t magically make the elephant smaller.

Never confuse courage with leverage.
Canada can be proud, independent and tough.
But we’re negotiating with the LARGEST economy on Earth, sitting directly beside us, buying hundreds of billions of dollars of Canadian goods every year.

And behind that negotiating position sits the most powerful military apparatus on the planet.

That’s not an insult to Canada.

That’s arithmetic.

You negotiate accordingly.
You don’t walk into a heavyweight fight weighing 145 pounds, slap the heavyweight champion across the face, and then give a press conference about how brave you were when you wake up.

Trump understands something very simple:
Negotiations ultimately happen underneath a hierarchy of economic, political and military power.

You don’t have to like that.
You don’t have to like him.
You don’t even have to think it’s fair.

But pretending the hierarchy doesn’t exist doesn’t make Canada stronger.
Pick the fight you can win!
And if you can’t win it?
Make a deal.
Then go home and build enough strength that next time, you negotiate from a bigger chair.

A 🇨🇦chihuahua barking at an Elephant🇺🇸 might technically be “standing its ground.”
It’s also still a chihuahua.

[Miranda Devine @mirandadevine]

This is the way to combat the false lure of socialism to young women. With real stories. Great campaign from @IWV