My personal assessment of today’s Manchester City vs Arsenal Community Shield final:
I felt Manchester City could have approached the game very differently, particularly with the starting XI and the tactical setup. Doku was arguably City’s biggest attacking threat in the first half and created more opportunities than most of the other attacking players. However, Semenyo struggled to influence the game from the right flank and, in my opinion, could have been more effective as an impact substitute in the second half.
I would have preferred to see Foden moved into a No. 10 role, where he could operate between the lines and have more freedom to influence the game. Cherki could also have been given a free-roaming/advanced midfield role, because of his ability to carry the ball, create chances, play progressive passes and threaten from distance.
I also wouldn’t have substituted Haaland so early. Even though he wasn’t receiving enough service, removing your main goal threat doesn’t necessarily solve the underlying problem. Instead, I would have encouraged the team to improve their passing accuracy, tempo and final-third decision-making, while looking to deliver the ball into the dangerous central areas around the edge of the box and penalty area rather than relying on predictable deliveries.
With Gvardiol back in the defensive line, I believe City had enough defensive stability to allow O’Reilly to move into a more advanced central midfield role, alongside Anderson and/or Kovacic. That could have provided better progression from midfield and allowed the attacking players to receive the ball higher up the pitch.
My preferred approach would therefore have been to establish better midfield control, quicker ball circulation, more movement between the lines and greater positional flexibility in the final third.
Ultimately, I felt City lacked a clear attacking structure. The passing was inaccurate, possession was surrendered too easily, there was limited coordination between the midfield and attack, and the defensive and midfield units often looked disconnected. Arsenal were able to exploit those spaces and dictate the tempo.
Obviously, this is just my personal tactical opinion, but I genuinely feel the coaching staff could have made better decisions with the team selection, positional roles and in-game management.
In short: the problem wasn’t a lack of individual quality it was a lack of cohesion, structure and execution. 🤣🤣🤣@ManCity@ManCityHelp@premierleague
My personal assessment of today’s Manchester City vs Arsenal Community Shield final:
I felt Manchester City could have approached the game very differently, particularly with the starting XI and the tactical setup. Doku was arguably City’s biggest attacking threat in the first half and created more opportunities than most of the other attacking players. However, Semenyo struggled to influence the game from the right flank and, in my opinion, could have been more effective as an impact substitute in the second half.
I would have preferred to see Foden moved into a No. 10 role, where he could operate between the lines and have more freedom to influence the game. Cherki could also have been given a free-roaming/advanced midfield role, because of his ability to carry the ball, create chances, play progressive passes and threaten from distance.
I also wouldn’t have substituted Haaland so early. Even though he wasn’t receiving enough service, removing your main goal threat doesn’t necessarily solve the underlying problem. Instead, I would have encouraged the team to improve their passing accuracy, tempo and final-third decision-making, while looking to deliver the ball into the dangerous central areas around the edge of the box and penalty area rather than relying on predictable deliveries.
With Gvardiol back in the defensive line, I believe City had enough defensive stability to allow O’Reilly to move into a more advanced central midfield role, alongside Anderson and/or Kovacic. That could have provided better progression from midfield and allowed the attacking players to receive the ball higher up the pitch.
My preferred approach would therefore have been to establish better midfield control, quicker ball circulation, more movement between the lines and greater positional flexibility in the final third.
Ultimately, I felt City lacked a clear attacking structure. The passing was inaccurate, possession was surrendered too easily, there was limited coordination between the midfield and attack, and the defensive and midfield units often looked disconnected. Arsenal were able to exploit those spaces and dictate the tempo.
Obviously, this is just my personal tactical opinion, but I genuinely feel the coaching staff could have made better decisions with the team selection, positional roles and in-game management.
In short: the problem wasn’t a lack of individual quality it was a lack of cohesion, structure and execution. 🤣🤣🤣@ManCity@ManCityHelp@premierleague
My personal assessment of today’s Manchester City vs Arsenal Community Shield final:
I felt Manchester City could have approached the game very differently, particularly with the starting XI and the tactical setup. Doku was arguably City’s biggest attacking threat in the first half and created more opportunities than most of the other attacking players. However, Semenyo struggled to influence the game from the right flank and, in my opinion, could have been more effective as an impact substitute in the second half.
I would have preferred to see Foden moved into a No. 10 role, where he could operate between the lines and have more freedom to influence the game. Cherki could also have been given a free-roaming/advanced midfield role, because of his ability to carry the ball, create chances, play progressive passes and threaten from distance.
I also wouldn’t have substituted Haaland so early. Even though he wasn’t receiving enough service, removing your main goal threat doesn’t necessarily solve the underlying problem. Instead, I would have encouraged the team to improve their passing accuracy, tempo and final-third decision-making, while looking to deliver the ball into the dangerous central areas around the edge of the box and penalty area rather than relying on predictable deliveries.
With Gvardiol back in the defensive line, I believe City had enough defensive stability to allow O’Reilly to move into a more advanced central midfield role, alongside Anderson and/or Kovacic. That could have provided better progression from midfield and allowed the attacking players to receive the ball higher up the pitch.
My preferred approach would therefore have been to establish better midfield control, quicker ball circulation, more movement between the lines and greater positional flexibility in the final third.
Ultimately, I felt City lacked a clear attacking structure. The passing was inaccurate, possession was surrendered too easily, there was limited coordination between the midfield and attack, and the defensive and midfield units often looked disconnected. Arsenal were able to exploit those spaces and dictate the tempo.
Obviously, this is just my personal tactical opinion, but I genuinely feel the coaching staff could have made better decisions with the team selection, positional roles and in-game management.
In short: the problem wasn’t a lack of individual quality it was a lack of cohesion, structure and execution. 🤣🤣🤣@ManCity
My personal assessment of today’s Manchester City vs Arsenal Community Shield final:
I felt Manchester City could have approached the game very differently, particularly with the starting XI and the tactical setup. Doku was arguably City’s biggest attacking threat in the first half and created more opportunities than most of the other attacking players. However, Semenyo struggled to influence the game from the right flank and, in my opinion, could have been more effective as an impact substitute in the second half.
I would have preferred to see Foden moved into a No. 10 role, where he could operate between the lines and have more freedom to influence the game. Cherki could also have been given a free-roaming/advanced midfield role, because of his ability to carry the ball, create chances, play progressive passes and threaten from distance.
I also wouldn’t have substituted Haaland so early. Even though he wasn’t receiving enough service, removing your main goal threat doesn’t necessarily solve the underlying problem. Instead, I would have encouraged the team to improve their passing accuracy, tempo and final-third decision-making, while looking to deliver the ball into the dangerous central areas around the edge of the box and penalty area rather than relying on predictable deliveries.
With Gvardiol back in the defensive line, I believe City had enough defensive stability to allow O’Reilly to move into a more advanced central midfield role, alongside Anderson and/or Kovacic. That could have provided better progression from midfield and allowed the attacking players to receive the ball higher up the pitch.
My preferred approach would therefore have been to establish better midfield control, quicker ball circulation, more movement between the lines and greater positional flexibility in the final third.
Ultimately, I felt City lacked a clear attacking structure. The passing was inaccurate, possession was surrendered too easily, there was limited coordination between the midfield and attack, and the defensive and midfield units often looked disconnected. Arsenal were able to exploit those spaces and dictate the tempo.
Obviously, this is just my personal tactical opinion, but I genuinely feel the coaching staff could have made better decisions with the team selection, positional roles and in-game management.
In short: the problem wasn’t a lack of individual quality it was a lack of cohesion, structure and execution. 🤣🤣🤣 @ManCity
PSG is demanding €180 million from Kylian Mbappé as compensation for a collapsed transfer to Saudi club Al Hilal. According to PSG, Mbappé promised not to leave the club on a free transfer, and by doing so, he deprived the club of a lucrative deal. Mbappé, on the other hand, has filed a counterclaim against PSG, demanding €240 million in damages for alleged psychological harassment and unpaid wages. The dispute stems from Mbappé's decision to join Real Madrid as a free agent in the summer of 2024, after refusing to sign a new deal with PSG ¹ ² ³.
The legal battle between the two parties is ongoing, with both sides believing they are entitled to hefty compensation. The Paris Labour Court heard the case recently, and a verdict is expected on December 16 ³.
PSG is demanding €180 million from Kylian Mbappé as compensation for a collapsed transfer to Saudi club Al Hilal. According to PSG, Mbappé promised not to leave the club on a free transfer, and by doing so, he deprived the club of a lucrative deal. Mbappé, on the other hand, has filed a counterclaim against PSG, demanding €240 million in damages for alleged psychological harassment and unpaid wages. The dispute stems from Mbappé's decision to join Real Madrid as a free agent in the summer of 2024, after refusing to sign a new deal with PSG ¹ ² ³.
The legal battle between the two parties is ongoing, with both sides believing they are entitled to hefty compensation. The Paris Labour Court heard the case recently, and a verdict is expected on December 16 ³.
Just a daily reminder that @BMW makes some of the most beautiful machines on four wheels. Precision, performance, and pure joy in motion. Manifesting that "Ultimate Driving Machine" in my driveway someday 😉 #BMW#DreamCar#ManifestingM3
Just a daily reminder that @BMW makes some of the most beautiful machines on four wheels. Precision, performance, and pure joy in motion. Manifesting that "Ultimate Driving Machine" in my driveway someday 😉 #BMW#DreamCar#ManifestingM3
After the silence of sirens fades,
And headlines bloom with sorrow’s shade,
Let us not turn our hearts to stone—
But plant tenderness where hate has grown.
Let the echoes of grief become our guides,
To where the silent courage of kindness resides.
In each shattered life, in each tear we share,
Find the unspoken question: how long will we despair?
Hold open hands, not clenched in fear—
Find common ground, though pain draws us near.
Whisper peace where anger brays:
A soft word mends where furious roars rage.
From rooftops of anguish, a glimmer—rise:
Beacons of love in mourning’s skies.
In sorrow’s wake, may hope take root,
And bloom as peace in every heart’s pursuit.
After the silence of sirens fades,
And headlines bloom with sorrow’s shade,
Let us not turn our hearts to stone—
But plant tenderness where hate has grown.
Let the echoes of grief become our guides,
To where the silent courage of kindness resides.
In each shattered life, in each tear we share,
Find the unspoken question: how long will we despair?
Hold open hands, not clenched in fear—
Find common ground, though pain draws us near.
Whisper peace where anger brays:
A soft word mends where furious roars rage.
From rooftops of anguish, a glimmer—rise:
Beacons of love in mourning’s skies.
In sorrow’s wake, may hope take root,
And bloom as peace in every heart’s pursuit.
It’s truly disheartening to witness the troubled state of our world today. From the pervasive inequalities that plague societies to the constant turmoil and conflict in various regions, it often feels like hope is in short supply. The air is filled with despair as communities struggle under the weight of poverty and injustice, while environmental degradation continues to wreak havoc on our planet. Each day seems to bring new challenges and heart-wrenching news that serve as a stark reminder of how far we have strayed from a peaceful and harmonious existence.
It’s truly disheartening to witness the troubled state of our world today. From the pervasive inequalities that plague societies to the constant turmoil and conflict in various regions, it often feels like hope is in short supply. The air is filled with despair as communities struggle under the weight of poverty and injustice, while environmental degradation continues to wreak havoc on our planet. Each day seems to bring new challenges and heart-wrenching news that serve as a stark reminder of how far we have strayed from a peaceful and harmonious existence.