@gmiller@sama Of course,
What is your point? There is obviously an AI arms race. Hence why the progress will no never stop and why a global referendum is possible
You think, China, the non-democratic state trying to out compete America will just agree???
@ra75293@gmiller@sama It could also rapidly increase our death but atleast we'd find out sooner
Personally I don't worry about it killing us. I worry more about the societal affects
@ra75293@gmiller@sama See in my opinion the getting invaded bit will just delays death
I have one solution but its also kinda dumb honestly
And thats open source absolutely everything. If enough people could band together to develop in the public together and we researched together it could work
@ra75293@gmiller@sama I'm not lying down either, I just think your approach is dumb
It's a tricky problem because if we make AI more regulated and its safe when its here
Than whoever owns (Sam Altman) it is literally just king and we're all screwed anyways socially
Its something I think about a lot
@ra75293@gmiller@sama What are you on
You just don't understand that what you're proposing is so dumb
The idea that other non-democratic foreign adversaries are just gonna sudden listen to your "pwetty pwease" is bonkers
You're right, it doesn't solve the problem. But it is what will happen
@ra75293@gmiller@sama It can be a technology for good. And will be in terms of advancement
You should be more concerned about how it will impact income inequality than how its going to destroy everyone
@ra75293@gmiller@sama What do you think the outcome will be if we go to the world and ask really really nicely to stop building AI and we stop
Then China comes out with an Insane AI and kills you anyways
We build it with alignment. A subject people much smarter than you are curently working on
@gmiller@sama Do you really think countries like China or Iran would just willy-nilly agree to a global referendum
Or even acknowledge it?
The AI is getting built regardless. And I know who I'd like to build the better one