The other infuriating thing about ppl posting ai writing is they don’t care enough to spare us of bad writing. If I hand wrote bad writing, at least it still communicates that it was my own expression. Whereas with ai writing it’s just pure noise to take up our limited attention. How dare you make me pay attention to all this fluff!
the root problem of ppl posting ai writing is that they're making us read bad writing! cliches like "not X but Y" are bad primarily bc they're empty. it's like listening to a marketing guy trying to manipulate you into believing something but is very bad at it. and the human who posted the writing endorses it! they're ok with you feeling manipulated!
the root problem of ppl posting ai writing is that they're making us read bad writing! cliches like "not X but Y" are bad primarily bc they're empty. it's like listening to a marketing guy trying to manipulate you into believing something but is very bad at it. and the human who posted the writing endorses it! they're ok with you feeling manipulated!
with that said i've been spending a lot of time iterating on a skill that fixes this core problem. rn its claude-code-only using the fork-subagent feature, will publish eventually, stay tuned
@TTien63@16kbps Maybe the real critique is: You let these ai music cliches exist in your composition, you didn’t do the work of judging if that’s what you really wanted
Maybe there’s a middle ground here? The guy used AI generated sounds but used his own sensibilities to chop up and compose them with ordinary samples into this whole thing. Sampling is fine unless you sample AI generated sounds?
But it doesn’t matter if you’re an anti ai purist? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Unless the thing is entirely AI generated but don’t think that’s the case