@iridescentslush Part of it for me is I don't really like how the current story is going. Alter has never been compelling to me and Wagstaff being tied to it has already killed my interest in wherever that storyline is going. Maybe they'll have some of them escape to make room for new characters.
@Freakoutery@mynamehear You realize labeling it like that makes those stances the more extreme points. Does the typical rightwinger see merit based admissions as bad and communism as good? Because thats what your chart is saying.
@HHighscore90295@DEIconsultant@kareem_carr 1. Does the paper show a clear tie in to the article (10 points)
2. Does the paper present a thoughtful reaction or response to the article, rather than a summary? (10 points)
3. Is the paper clearly written? (5 points)
If article was the rubric you would have gotten a 0.
@DEIconsultant@kareem_carr The paper had neither quotes nor citations to the article, was reactionary to the title of it and tripped over itself with clumsy phrasing. I could see maybe a 2-3/25 since it had complete sentences but that's a bar scraping the floor.
@H8KUcom@LordSturmVII@vxunderground If its a feature all the game devs use :0 might as well lump in all games developed on a windows computer since they implemented ai into their shitty search assistant.
@H8KUcom@vxunderground I saw somewhere else there was a suggestion where you would have to tag what AI was used to assist, (IE; art, code, etc etc) and you could remedy it by just having them tag what engine a game was made in.
@H8KUcom@vxunderground Fair I guess, but personally I wouldn't make the accusation without specific proof.
Plus depending on the feature developed with AI there's a real chance that most games wouldn't even use it.