🚨 BREAKING
Iran: "The Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until Trump tells the world the truth about Epstein Island."
The US has hit a brick wall...
Andrew
Let me offer advice.
Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.
When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.
Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.
That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.
Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.
Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.
You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.
That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.
So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.
Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.
You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@JohnMappin@ImMappin@joekent16jan19@TRobinsonNewEra@LionelMedia@IanCarrollShow@AwakenWithJP@jimmy_dore@OwenBenjamin@leahfiles@realstewpeters@EstulinVz@RealAlexJones@HarrisonHSmith@BlakeSNeff@TPUSA@DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel
So Lance Twiggs burned the actual “handwritten confession note” left for him by Robinson?
He actively destroyed evidence of the biggest political assassination of our lifetime but he was given immunity and was only interviewed ONE time between Sep. 2025 and April 2026.
FED
The Charlie Kirk assassination is the first criminal case I'm aware of where dozens of influencers are telling you not to ask questions
The science is settled, so it's not necessary to use your own ears and eyes
This reminds me of covid and the holocast
🚨The officer responsible for the Charlie Kirk investigation and preserving the crime scene just testified that he found out it had been repaved… from the news.
Tyler Robinson is guilty… Get vaccinated… 6 feet apart… Tyler Robinson is guilty…. Wear your mask… Tyler Robinson is guilty… Muslims hijacked planes and slammed them into the twin towers.. Tyler Robinson is guilty.. We landed on the moon.. Trust the science… Tyler Robinson is guilty…The evidence is damning.. Oswald killed JFK.. He was the lone shooter… Get your boosters… Erika Kirk is a mourning widow… Building 7 fell on its own due to fires… Epstein Killed himself… Tyler Robinson is guilty..Wear sunscreen, the sun gives you cancer… Charlie Kirk had a Superman neck… Tyler Robinson is guilty
See a pattern here???
It never ends.
This is how they feed the sheep.
They must repeat the lies.
It’s not just MSN, it’s alternative media
This is your reminder that so far @RealCandaceO is the only person who has presented a clear photo you can tell is Tyler Robinson in any location on September 10th or 11th.
The government has yet to do that.
If you want to prove to someone that Charlie's shirt moves BEFORE the damage to his neck, show them this. It is unbelievable that anyone believes it was a bullet. At this point, I think some people just say they believe the FEDSLOP because their hatred of Candace Owens outweighs their love of the truth.
They had multiple Lee Harvey Oswald lookalikes too. This is the same playbook they've been running for a very long time. Not sure why this is so difficult for ppl to grasp in 2026.
Charlie Kirk started debating college leftists nearly 15 years ago and never had an attempt at his life.
But just when Kirk started questioning israel, we’re supposed to believe that some untrained leftist “furry” pulled off one of the highest profile ass*ssinations of all time?