Reading the Padilla, I remembered the employee from the Lorenz piece who said that Instagram cares most about people spending time on the app for revenue. I feel like IG removing likes is only motivated by making people feel less self conscious SO THAT usage/profit ⬆️
@CUComm3200
Turkle’s piece seemed a little ignorant when it talked about how online connection doesn’t constitute real conversation; marginalized communities, like trans people, as Burns notes, are afforded great solidarity through the Internet that real life can’t always offer @CUComm3200
When the Burns mentioned the Trump administration creating a culture war that’s killing trans rights, I thought about a headline I recently saw about this admin trying to pass something... during a pandemic... that would allow doctors to refuse trans patients.... @CUComm3200
From the Baym, I was interested to see that women were making remixes of tv footage since 1969. When I’ve seen TV show edits on Twitter and Instagram, I’ve thought these were media unique to the 2010s. Yet, we continue to learn about women as pioneers in this class. @CUComm3200
(Posting this because I did my two tweets on Lorenz and Bromwich last week, but the Bromwich reading got pushed back and I’m not sure if it would therefore count for that week so I’m hoping this one can take its place... sorry about dat)
Bryant, like Lorenz, points out that influencers aren’t offered the same protections as bigger celebrities. Bryant says celebs have more income security than influencers, in times like these, and Lorenz points out how they don’t have teams to deal with harassment. @CUComm3200
In the Bromwich, the comparison of cancelling someone = breaking up with them reminded me of my friend who once loved Kim Petras. After finding out about her involvement with Dr. Luke, an abuser, my friend “cancelled” her and took space from her music, like a breakup. @CUComm3200
With the negative effects COVID isolation has on mental health, the Lorenz made me fear for micro-celebs who have to deal with IG harassment on top of isolation; they’re more vulnerable bc they don’t have the resources that big celebs do to deter involvement w trolls. @CUComm3200
In reading about how most content creators can’t mention coronavirus in the Stolkel-Walker, I realized how new Youtuber beef that I’ve seen might be coming from the involved parties needing to look for content that can fill the hole of not talking about COVID-19 @CUComm3200
From the Cook, I was upset to read how Selena had to label herself as a dancer instead of a stripper on IG, out of fear of being censored, whereas far right activists can spew whatever damaging rhetoric they want onto the platform. IG is being blatantly misogynistic. @CUComm3200
Jackson mentions how, thankfully, people can’t be as openly ignorant due to marginalized communities having an empowered voice on Twitter. I saw this when users held influencer Trisha Paytas responsible for claiming she was trans/having D.I.D with no basis whatsoever @CUComm3200
Papacharissi’s notion of the “doubling of place” interested me because I immediately related it to the Super Bowl, where it takes place in some stadium, but, culturally, it’s also located within Twitter/IG/Facebook, due to the coverage and memes that result from it. @CUComm3200
In the Woolley/Howard, I was fascinated to see that bots make up 30 million active Twitter accounts, but I wasn’t completely surprised, considering the amount of times I see political users call out bot “users’” tweets’ locations as contradicting the tweet’s content. @CUComm3200
In the Swanson, not only did the included Insta pics annoy me, due to the gross wealth they depicted, but also so did hearing how low SES college graduates are as well off as wealthy high school dropouts; education is always emphasized as THE source of opportunity :/ @CUComm3200
I see Albany and Sanvic’s point as to how TikTok disguises itself as a creative platform of expression, and not social media, in order to pass under parents’ radars; my younger cousins/their parents do dances on it, despite the racism it’s viewing algorithms promote. @CUComm3200
In the Noble, I was horrified to read about the racist search results tied to the White House and Michelle Obama, and it made me wonder how search algorithms are reviewed for such blatantly racist results to ensue. Do we put too much faith in corporate info control? @CUComm3200
When Ho includes “there’s an intimacy to Tumblr, between the followers,” I recalled a friend who was one of the only trans gnc people in my year who used it to find other gnc people they could talk to; the internet can really help to unify marginalized communities!!@CUComm3200
When Goldberg’s article mentioned how feminist reporting loses its edge when not being reported by the feminists it targets, it made me wonder when those outside marginalized communities should use their voice to empower. What does being an effective ally entail?
@CUComm3200
When Weber and Seetharamn’s article mentioned that Facebook’s content moderators have “up to” 3 counseling sessions a YEAR, a shockingly scarce resource, I thought this well represented the article’s main point regarding the unethical treatment of content moderators. @CUComm3200