UK 🇬🇧 De eerste nieuwszender van het Verenigd Koninkrijk heeft zojuist een reportage uitgezonden over een getuigenis die is gepresenteerd voor het Amerikaanse Congres 🇺🇸, waarin wordt uitgelegd waarom de Covid-boosterprikken kanker hebben veroorzaakt.
Angus Dalgleish, wereldberoemde oncoloog, legt uit:
« Mensen die hun kanker hadden overwonnen, begonnen terug te keren naar hun ziekte; ze hadden allemaal boosterprikken gekregen. »
« Het is simpel: de boosterprikken »
A Russian psychologist spent 10 years proving that the act of talking to yourself out loud is one of the most powerful cognitive tools the human brain has, and almost nobody outside his field has read the work.
His name was Lev Vygotsky.
He worked in Moscow in the 1920s and died of tuberculosis in 1934 at the age of 37. He had no laboratory, no funding, almost no English readers, and a body of work that the Soviet government suppressed for two decades after he died.
He produced the foundational theory of how human cognition actually develops, and the central piece of that theory was a behavior almost every adult is faintly embarrassed about.
Vygotsky noticed that young children talk to themselves constantly. They narrate their own actions, they argue with imaginary opponents, they instruct themselves through tasks out loud.
The dominant theory at the time, from the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, said this was a sign of cognitive immaturity that children would eventually grow out of as they learned to think properly.
Vygotsky said the exact opposite.
He argued that this self-directed speech was the most important cognitive event in the entire developmental window, because it was the moment a child first started to use language as a tool to control their own mind. The child was not failing to think. The child was learning how to think by externalizing the process and listening to themselves do it.
He predicted that as children matured, this out-loud self-talk would not disappear. It would go underground. It would become silent inner speech, which is the running monologue every adult has inside their own head for the rest of their life.
The voice you hear when you read this sentence is the direct descendant of a four-year-old narrating their own block tower.
For 50 years almost nobody outside Russia had access to his work, and the few researchers who did pick it up could not get funding to test it. Then in the early 2000s the experiments finally started to pile up, and what they found was that Vygotsky had been right about something even more important than he knew.
The first major study came from Gary Lupyan at the University of Wisconsin and Daniel Swingley at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. They ran a simple visual search experiment. Participants were shown 20 images at once and asked to find a specific object, like a banana or a chair. In one condition they searched silently. In the other condition they were told to say the name of the object out loud to themselves while looking for it.
The participants who spoke the target name out loud found the object significantly faster, with higher accuracy, than the participants who searched in silence. The effect was strongest when the spoken word matched a familiar object the brain already had a strong category for.
Saying the word out loud literally tuned the visual system to detect that thing better. The researchers called it the label feedback effect, and the implication was that the act of vocalizing a goal physically changes how the brain processes the world while pursuing it.
The second major study came out of the University of Michigan and Michigan State in 2017. The lead researchers were Ethan Kross and Jason Moser, and they used both EEG and fMRI to record what happens inside the brain when people talk to themselves while emotionally upset.
They asked participants to recall painful autobiographical memories and reflect on them in two different ways. Some used the first person, saying things like "why am I feeling this way." Others used the third person, referring to themselves by their own name, saying things like "why is John feeling this way."
The brain scans showed that the simple act of switching from first person to third person, even silently, decreased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for rumination and self-referential pain. Within a single second of using their own name instead of the word I, participants showed measurably lower emotional reactivity. The shift required no extra cognitive effort. It cost the brain nothing. And it worked.
Kross described the mechanism in his interviews. Talking to yourself by name creates a small amount of psychological distance from your own experience. Your brain processes the situation more like a problem belonging to someone else, which means it can analyze it instead of drowning in it.
What Vygotsky had intuited in 1934 turned out to be even more powerful than the developmental theory he built it into. The voice you use to talk to yourself is not background noise. It is one of the most precise cognitive tools the brain has, and you can change how it works just by changing the pronoun you use.
People who talk through problems out loud are not anxious or unstable. They are running an externalized version of a process the rest of us are running silently and worse. The kindergartener narrating their block tower, the surgeon muttering through a procedure, the engineer pacing a hallway describing a bug to nobody, the athlete repeating a cue to themselves before a free throw, they are all using the same ancient mechanism that builds and steers human thought.
You can run the experiment yourself the next time you are stuck on something hard. Stop trying to solve it silently in your head. Say it out loud. Describe what you are seeing. Walk yourself through the steps as if you were explaining it to a colleague who is not in the room.
And when something genuinely upsets you, switch to your own name. Ask why this person is feeling this way, instead of why I am feeling this way.
The voice you have been told to keep quiet your entire life is one of the oldest pieces of cognitive technology you own.
Most people are still embarrassed to use it.
💔 Tragic loss: 6-month-old Bently was killed by 13 vaccines administered without his mother Alisa’s informed consent at Cook Children’s Clinic in Fort Worth, TX.
The young mother, per normal was pressured by the pediatrician. She was unaware her son would receive a lethal overdose of vaccines, including two triple doses of DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), Hepatitis B, polio, three oral rotavirus doses, and a pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine.
“Totally unbeknownst to his mother, Bently received a staggering 13 vaccinations that day,” the article reveals, exposing the clinic’s failure to disclose the dangerous number of shots.
Alisa shared her heart-wrenching story:
“I trusted them to take care of my baby, and they took him from me. I was hesitant about vaccines, but the doctor kept pushing, saying it was routine and safe. I didn’t know they were giving him 13 shots at once. Bently was happy and healthy that morning, smiling like always. After the appointment, he wasn’t himself - he was so fussy, wouldn’t eat, and felt hot. I called the clinic, but they told me it was normal and to give him Tylenol. That night, I checked on him, and he wasn’t breathing. I tried to wake him, screaming his name, but he was gone. My world ended. I rushed him to the hospital, but they couldn’t save him. Later, I found out through his records they gave him all those vaccines. I never would’ve agreed to that. They killed my baby, and I’ll never forgive myself for trusting them.”
Bently’s death was caused by cardiac arrest from the vaccine overload, with studies cited in the article linking such incidents to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), the third leading cause of infant death in the US, peaking at 2-4 months during heavy vaccination schedules.
“Vaccines are administered without proper oversight,” the article warns.
This preventable tragedy underscores the need for informed consent and accountability. 😭💔
“The difference between Bently’s death and a drunk driving death, is that in the case of vaccines – the one who commits the negligent homicide, signs the death certificate.” – Retired LAPD officer Clark Baker
🔗 Full story: https://t.co/JvCaW6FQiD
🔗 Watch Alisa’s interview: https://t.co/TNv34bFAso
People claim that the reason why the Rapid Antigen Tests can be hacked to test positive with fruits and sodas is because it alters the pH.
Yet here, totally pH neutral Vodka tests positive for "Sars Cov + Flu A/B"
Hmm imagine that. Nicotine competes with the Krait venom analog on the Spike Protein. 5 years ago I was kicked out of Peter McCollough's Covid working group for this information. Wonder if he will ever apologize. Strange thing this thing called Life.
@TheoVon
I don't want Bovaer in my milk.
I don't want folic acid in my flour.
I don't want fluorine in my drinking water.
I don't want palm oil in my chocolate.
I don't want margarine in my cakes.
I don't want my fruit and veg sprayed with glyphosate.
I don't want my apples coated with Apeel.
I don't want my fish and chips cooked in veg oil.
I don't want crappy processed mayo on my burger.
I don't want roast spuds out of a freezer.
I don't want non-grass-fed beef.
I don't want farmed salmon.
I don't want GMO garbage.
... so I don't consume any of these products.
How sad we allow clowns to fcuk around with our food and drink in this way though. 🤦♂️
Mom Demands Vaccine Insert for Her 10-Year-Old... Clinic Refuses & Admits She's 'Discharged' for Saying No.
Listen up, America. This is raw, unfiltered tyranny in a medical office. A protective mama bear is looking that front desk straight in the eye, asking the most basic question any parent should: "You're telling me it's safe for my daughter, but I can't see what's actually in it?"
And what does she get? Runaround. "Call this 800 number." "Go to the CDC website." "We can't give you the insert that comes in the box." "You're discharged from the practice anyway."
They won't hand over the damn paper that lists ingredients, risks, and contraindications, the very thing that comes WITH the shot, but they'll pressure you to roll up your kid's sleeve. That's not healthcare, that's a cult. That's "trust us, bro" while they hide behind bureaucracy and HIPAA excuses that don't even apply.
We don't bow to white coat priests who treat informed consent like a dirty word. Parents have a God-given right to know exactly what they're injecting into their children. Full stop. No ingredients list? No jab.
The system isn't broken, it's working exactly as designed to keep you compliant and in the dark.
Protect your kids. Question everything. And never let them shame you for demanding transparency.
One of Professor Francis Boyle's last interviews before being found dead.
He called the COVID shots 'franken-shot' Bioweapons.
He called out Bill Gates as a depopulation Eugenicist.
"They've used this one disease for DECADES to scare us into compliance...but what if the REAL history of polio changes EVERYTHING you thought you knew?"
~Forrest Maready
Once you see the truth, their fear tactics fall apart.