... does that make this present SCOTUS no longer a constitutional Branch of the United States. The POTUS is constitutionally responsible for the national security of the country. Does this give him the authority to declare the present members of the SCOTUS that ruled in this manner as non-combative enemies of the country under both the constitution and Patriot Act!!!
https://t.co/uILjT8kmas... The SCOTUS has just announced to the country and world that it no longer represents the sovereignty, integrity or security and safety of the United States and its "Natural born" citizenship as defined in the country's constitution. Now since this is the present situation threatening the national security and safety of the country and its rightful and legal citizens ... what might be done? ... it seems the "Executive Branch" of the separated but of equal responsibility of the 'separation of powers' (to prevent a form of singular or centralized form of the old governments under the country's "constitutional guide") ... now might exercise its sole responsibility of enforcing the 'National security and future safety of its original constitution and definition of the new country's citizenship. The Executive (President) has the constitutional power of overriding and ignoring a SCOTUS ruling that itself goes against the "constitution and National security of the country and its legal citizens!!!
Shared with Public
https://t.co/uILjT8kmas... The SCOTUS has just announced to the country and world that it no longer represents the sovereignty, integrity or security and safety of the United States and its "Natural born" citizenship as defined in the country's constitution. Now since this is the present situation threatening the national security and safety of the country and its rightful and legal citizens ... what might be done? ... it seems the "Executive Branch" of the separated but of equal responsibility of the 'separation of powers' (to prevent a form of singular or centralized form of the old governments under the country's "constitutional guide") ... now might exercise its sole responsibility of enforcing the 'National security and future safety of its original constitution and definition of the new country's citizenship. The Executive (President) has the constitutional power of overriding and ignoring a SCOTUS ruling that itself goes against the "constitution and National security of the country and its legal citizens!!!
emily jane squires on X: "@LindseyGrahamSC How many people know that Israel was governed by 'Judges' until they supposedly asked GOD for a King' Increasing numbers of people are now suspecting that by purposely aggravating the population with some insane rulings by Judges ... that will eventually bring the majority of the" / X
@dmorelli9@glennbeck Read the Federalist Papers written by the three men that wrote the constitution ... for those that might have trouble with understanding their reasons and purpose.
@dmorelli9@glennbeck There job is to interpret the laws passed by Congress as to whether they are indeed constitutional. Let's just agree we don't agree on this topic. Enjoy the 250th year this next weekend and hope for good weather.
The SCOTUS is responsible for ensuring that any legislation(law) passed by the COTUS is in accordance with the 'constitution' as written and explained by the Founders in their 'Federalist Papers.' The Founder's constitution is what it says and not subject to interpretation. It can be 'amended' through the proper constitutional manners.
As expected, Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the liberals on the Supreme Court to hold that "Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause."
@bennyjohnson How much of the U.S. population know the facts as to how some of these people have been put on the Supreme Court of the country?? They were not legitimately and honesty appointed by representatives of a 'sovereign United States!!!'
https://t.co/9w9Ok1iP78
Some people believe she previously agreed to vote for this position which would be coming before the SCOTUS in order to be confirmed on the SCOTUS. Unfortunately you can not control 'human nature' and it is thus natural for the individual (most) to act in their own best interest than that of others!!!