Western: it is hard to sell our video games. movies etc, but we don't know why.
Eastern: win a 24H race with a waifu car sponsored by Anime loyal fans (yes that is the sponsor of the car), fans who also loves to spend tones of money on merchandise.
F1 fans today: Russell should not get a penalty because passing under breaking is diving and it is not possible to be side by side and thus pass in that corner
Same people: in 1990 Prost deserved to be ramed at 300km/h because the year prior he did not let Senna dive under breaking in a corner where it is impossible to be side by side and thus pass
at least the beauty of that sport is that fans are as inconsistent as Marshalls...
We are saddened and heartbroken to share the news of the passing of Kyle Busch, a two-time Cup champion and one of our sport's greatest and fiercest drivers. He was 41 years old.
We extend our deepest condolences to the Busch family, Richard Childress Racing and the entire motorsports community.
Only 6% difference is not very reassuring for the Blues.
It would be interesting to do it with a computer virus for example, download A no virus, download B, virus that kills your computer if less than 50% downloaded it ... it does not kill anyone but would show the real behavior ...
Because if this would really be all of earth, and if people would really have a gun on their head (because it is easy to say you would give your life for a kid behind your screen, it is different to do it in real life) ... I think there are doubt the Blue would really get the 50% ....
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
my take on this:
the question can be rephrased as: Red you live, Blue you may die (and only live if majority of people follows you).
In theory, you expect everyone to answer "I want to live", so 100% Red, no problem.
In reality, some people will pick Blue, so other people will also pick blue by altruism to save all the Blues.
But by doing that, Blue are also acknowledging that some people are just ... not smart enough... to answer "I want to live".
I feel like this is more a: do you want or not to bail out people that make wrong decisions
It is quite interesting to be fair.
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
You probably meant: like the game is showing, when men have paternal instincts toward kids, they are de facto treated as p3do, so most men will have to hide those instinct resulting in women thinking that paternal instincts does not exist.
as soon as they have kid of their own, not only they are not bound to that BS but they can double down on it and treat it as the most precious thing they have.
Also I am not comparing maternal and paternal instinct.. just mentioning that it exist, and being suppressed, confusing people between causality and effects ...
that's a critic at the same level than game journalist ...
but even if I take Grummz comments:
"DEI": the truth is that it was not, she was not a boss-girl, she was more of a loser to be fair
"Bugs at launch": where do I start the list of game like that? why not Crimson? that does not stop a game to be good
"Nothing new":
- first open world star wars game
- combined exploration, fight, space travel, dog fight, mini-games etc.
- "ubi gameplay that played it formulaic": well ... it is their game, I guess they will reuse things they have
- "Safe": that is almost the smoking gun. If it is safe it should not be too bad, and if it was, then it should have new things ... so which one is it?
most people criticising it haven't and admit it That game was not a masterpiece but it was shot down only because people hated Ubisoft. Which is ... exactly what they criticise the game journalists of doing ... the problem is that if you try to be the good guy, don't act like the bad one ....
@PgmMarco par contre le mec qui dis que le jeux video c'est pas une passion et juste un moyen de passer du bon temps, il va sans doute dire qu'il voit pas le probleme ...
On dirait du troll mais pour repondre:
imagine ton jeux video prefere. Tu enleves le son, tu reduit le numbre de pixels de moitie, l'histoire est suprimee, toute les mecaniques sont maintenant automatique, et tu as juste 1 bouton, par contre ton FPS passe de 60 a 120.
Est ce que ton jeux prefere est plus passionant? ou est-ce qu'il a peut etre perdu un peu ce qui cree des emotions ou sensation?
@SC_Zakalwe@Grummz agree, I think it is a fair score ... and it is a good game, but I wonder why it feels so "pushed" by "influencers", it is definitely not a "perfect 10/10 this is revolutionary!"