@Heal_within96 rifles
in the woods
while hunting
and that's before even taking into account the statistical probability a 14 year old black has a gun to commit a violent crime.
the distrust is earned. our behavior is not equal.
@v224info@SteakFaust@NotABBWLover absolutely no reason you couldn't pour your bourbon in a stainless steel sauce pot, light it, and cook off the alcohol. take the fluid that's left. let it cool, mix it with something else and pour it in your spray bottle with a funnel
@NotABBWLover not just that the part of what you're doing is trying to keep that one specific section from drying out excessively. alcohol is going to evaporate faster than just about anything you could put on that. the point is to keep it cooler for longer.
@Shawan4Freedom@CaptainCodeman yeah I think your problem in this case is you have people that'll order 3 waters and one drink, all four people will share the same drink and keep getting it refilled.
there are certain people that just feel like they need to get revenge on life by getting something extra.
because it's not the best way to help the people that need help. you taking money that can be given directly, doing it to a government that takes a cut, before giving it to an NGO that takes a cut, and the people who actually need the help end up getting left with table scraps. meanwhile, the government program and the NGO do things that are completely unrelated to actually solving the problem of homelessness, it can be called the coalition to end homelessness forever and save kittens, but the reality is all it does is employ one guy who's a congressman's cousin on a massive salary as the head of a " non-profit".
The people you want to help are getting pennies on the dollar for the taxes that are collected. This is why people are telling you that using taxes to pay for these things is retarded.
you can try to otherize people like both sides do and claim that the other side wants to do all these evil. horrible awful things, Republicans want to kill gay kids, Democrats want to kill babies, Republicans hate black people, Democrats hate white people, if that's intellectually lazy and stupid.
the reality is most people want to help others, most people want to solve society's problems, we disagree about the best way of doing it, but where I will always draw the line and call myself. an avid right-winger is the fact that the government sucks at doing the job, it's the most wasteful way. possible to actually help people, and wanting to kill a government program that's designed to do something doesn't mean that I believe that doing that thing is a bad cause, it could either mean that it's a cause that's being attempted in the dumbest way possible, or that it's short-sighted.
you want to help the homeless? probably 90% of them are addicts. and most addicts have a dual diagnosis, they're not getting treatment, many of whom refuse treatment. we think we're doing them a favor letting them roam free untreated and just putting them in homes or giving them money or giving them shelters, but they're not getting treatment. they're staying homeless, they're staying untreated and imbalanced, they're staying mentally ill and dysfunctional, usually dying at an early age and leaving any families. they still have that talk to them heartbroken and destroyed. but instead of actually helping them and forcing them to get sober and get off the streets, we want to have the soft glove to approach that loves them into an early grave. we want to build homes for them because that's totally why they're homeless, they just can't afford homes. if you actually work with the homeless, you know that's not that they can't afford homes or that they can't find help, it's that they want to be high and the people trying to help them won't let them be high.
for the other 10% that are sober and homeless, and they actually want to not be homeless, they usually don't stay homeless for very long. this is all backed by statistics, this is all backed by people who work with the homeless, and if you spent any time working with the homeless you would know this yourself.
but you think you're doing them a favor by asking for more tax dollars to go to helping them? All you're doing is bleeding me dry nd funneling money into slush funds for assholes that party on Epstein Island.
what's frustrating is not having the lab at all so that you can't actually look and say yes, these aren't just in range but they're optimal as a ratio. If you just look at estrogen and isolation you might say it's optimal. you're fine. your libido is not hormonal, but you don't test shbg or testosterone, so you don't know if that optimal estrogen is all bound, you don't know what the ratio of estrogen and testosterone is, you're in the dark and you feel like you're being gas lit because the guy knows says your hormones are fine.
it's hard enough for men, and at least with us they will take libido seriously when it comes to symptoms necessitating HRT.
for women they largely ignore it. they just say it's part of getting older and you're obviously perimenopausal and you shouldn't expect to have a sex drive over 40.