@RonniSalt @inxanadudid @mjrowland68@PeterDutton_MP@SenatorWong@bridgeyb People are now talking about ‘where’ nuclear reactors will go… it’s madness indeed. Why are people buying into a discussion about how something might be done, when the starting idea is so preposterous? Just what Dutton wants isn’t it.
@janine_hendry Look for another role straight away. As tough as it is, if she lets this go, the owner will continue to do it. In interim, she can affirm that she’d advised her unavailability ahead of time, and isn’t able to assist with rostering management to cover it. Polite, firm. Boundaries.
Dutton's “suggestion that things might be fixed by an audit of funding a system that his government designed and watched over for a decade and … the Productivity Commission … found had failed to meet even its own goals.” https://t.co/9KVAe1xXco
@jeremyrockliff There is at least one current affordable housing development being blocked by one of your own departments Jeremy. How about you take the politics out of state departments pushing their own siloed agendas to the detriment of local community and much needed commercial investment?
Thank you New England Times!
This is journalism, where they;
1. clarify the manipulation of photos by politicians (town hall was only 1/5th full)
2. clarify many baseless claims made
3. give those most impacted a chance to respond
https://t.co/CvzqOI9FFy
“No doubt the (safeguard) mechanism represents a significant advance on the climate policy of the previous Coalition government, but it would cut Australia’s total emissions by only about 215 million tonnes, or 8 per cent, by 2030, at best.”
Australia is already the world’s biggest exporter of liquified natural gas and the second-largest coal exporter.
The bipartisan position is that we should mine more. Can the IPCC report, a “how-to guide to defuse the climate time bomb”, change this?
https://t.co/zV7DzyH26c