CP ⚡️☀️🌻🚀

[CP ⚡️☀️🌻🚀 @cpow_]

After years of waiting, I finally bought my Model 3 with FSD!!!! 🥳🥳🥳 it is everything I ever dreamed of. Thank you so much @elonmusk and everyone at Tesla for making the best product ever 🤍

[Swann Marcus @SwannMarcus89]

Funniest shit ever is when low-IQ envious dorks say things like “Elon didn’t dramatically reduce the cost of space flight, his employees did.”

That would be like saying Napoleon didn’t win battles because if he wasn’t there his soldiers would have just organized themselves

[Paul Graham @paulg]

"... the political left has long had a remarkable lack of interest in how wealth is created. As far as they are concerned, wealth exists somehow and the only interesting question is how to redistribute it."

— Thomas Sowell

[David Zagaynov @DavidZagaynov]

The sheer scale of a trillion dollars can be hard to comprehend. Let me put it in perspective. You would be able to buy 42 miles of high speed rail in California with that much money.

[Cav Senpai @cavannastan]

Again for those in the back, Elon once offered to cut a check for $6 BILLION to the WFB to "eliminate World hunger" as they said the money could. His one condition was that the accounting was public.

They did not accept.

[Fusilli Spock @awstar11]

The Left hates it when capitalism works

[Erik Voorhees @ErikVoorhees]

No, you don't get it.

He does not have $1 trillion sitting in cash, it is 99% stock in his companies.

To make that wealth liquid would mean selling all that stock which would swiftly destroy *both* the companies (Tesla, SpaceX, others) and the wealth. If he sold it all, he'd end up with maybe $100b max, several hundred thousand people would be out of work, the companies ruined and many of their suppliers also ruined.

Okay, but now Elon has $100b in cash, and can "solve the world's problems".

$100b divided by the world's 8 billion people is $12

If you were in charge, several of the most innovative industrial companies in the world would be destroyed, hundreds of thousands out of work, and space would again close to human civilization for another generation.

But everyone on earth could have one nice meal and you could revel in your altruism.

[Lost Nomad @lost_nomad__]

Maybe a hot take? but we are in a pretty good place right now on this. Zuckerberg is correct

The world’s richest people are chasing things that genuinely would improve humanity. Space colonization, medicine, scientific breakthroughs

I have no doubt the slopulists will paint this stuff as somehow terrible, but the facts are the facts

[@jason @Jason]

The highest-ranking openly gay cabinet member was selected by [checks notes]... President Trump!

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

The murder of Henry Nowak is everything BLM wanted George Floyd’s death to be.

[Katie Miller @KatieMiller]

31% of FIFA countries ban and/or criminalize homosexuality.

[Hunter Ash @ArtemisConsort]

The brain is only 2% of human body weight, but consumes 20% of your energy. We must redistribute this energy to achieve a more equitable outcome. Time for the brain to pay its fair share!

[Paul is going to vibecamp! @Paul_Melman]

This is the "5G activates vaccine microchips" of the left

[Jordan Schachtel @JordanSchachtel]

New data centers generate so much tax revenue for the local govt that you can almost zero out property taxes entirely. A bold politician could go as far as proposing a data center dividend for residents. The ridiculous degrowth psyop against these buildouts is so nonsensical.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle.

Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années.

Les chiffres bruts.

1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité.
2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%.

1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce.

Qui a fait ça ?

Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ».

Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme.

Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe.

La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique.

Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz.

Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen.

La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées.

ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat.

La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.

[Virgoguy @Virggoguy]

Not a single Muslim country supports gay rights or marriages. Some one can get the death penalty for performing homosexual acts. Yet, liberals support them over America.

[John Mozena @johnmoz]

Data centers aren't uniquely energy-hungry. One aluminum smelter draws as much power as all of Nashville.

Utilities used to build power plants to meet that demand but today, regulations & litigation make that almost impossible.

We need more power plants, not fewer data centers.

[Aetius @AetiusRF]

His presidency started an era of decline, ugliness, and insanity that embedded itself in American culture

[Rose Smith @itsrosesm]

Obama donated NONE of his salary. Michelle had a staff of 23.
Trump donates ALL of his salary. Melania has a staff of 4. In life there are givers and there are takers.

[Michael Knowles @michaeljknowles]

Pardon me, I’ll just be over here injecting this speech directly into my veins.