Criptocrates

₿ Bitcoin Maxi | 🔑 Criptografía | 🛡️ Ciberseguridad | ⚡ Tecnología
Soberanía. Privacidad. Libertad.
Piensa. Cuestiona. Acumula.

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

Bienvenidos a Criptócrates.

₿ Bitcoin
🔐 Criptografía
🛡️ Ciberseguridad
⚡ Tecnología

Aquí no venimos a seguir al mercado.
Venimos a entenderlo.

Cuestionar. Verificar. Aprender.
Y, sobre todo, defender la soberanía individual.

21M.

Piensa. Cuestiona. Acumula.

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@CrypttoManiac_ A ver si tenemos suerte y se va a 0

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

Me hace gracia que crearan RLUSD teniendo XRP.

Supongo que querían una stablecoin con poca volatilidad... 🤣

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@TheBTCTherapist Today’s Bitcoin DCA purchase completed!

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

Ahora que el debate de BIP-110 prácticamente ha terminado, creo que toca empezar a mirar hacia BIP-360.

Este sí puede ser un cambio realmente importante para Bitcoin y para toda la industria.

Menos ruido, más atención a lo que viene.

BIP-360 merece estar en el radar.

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@adam3us Looks like you were right about BIP-110.
The interesting part now is what happens next. Bitcoin consensus is proving once again that social consensus matters just as much as code.
Curious to see how this plays out from here.

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

Todo el mundo habla de BIP-110 y de si se activará.

Pero la pregunta interesante es otra:

¿Qué pasa si unos nodos consideran inválido un bloque que los mineros consideran válido?

Ahí empieza el lío.

Bitcoin no son solo mineros. Es consenso.

[Samson Mow @Excellion]

The @BlockstreamJade is one of the best hardware wallets on the market, bar none. I wonder how many people dismissed it due to the FUD that it lacked a secure element?

Secure elements aren't a panacea but are often sold as such. A physical SE in the device means everything needed to extract the seed is sitting right there, and potentially in the hands of someone that steals it. It's a stationary target. An attacker can wreck a dozen units learning the technique before touching yours. Ledger's Donjon has done exactly this to Coldcard silicon twice, the Mk2 ATECC508A and later the SE2 on Mk4, and voltage-glitched the Trezor Safe 3's MCU.

Jade moves the target instead. Your seed is encrypted with an AES-256 key that the device and a blind oracle build between them, and the oracle never holds more than a piece of it. The ESP32 only has ciphertext. You can't extract something that was never in there. The attack turns interactive, against a party who rate-limits you and wipes its half after three bad PINs.

Coldcard split your secret across three chips from different SEs. That genuinely helps against one vendor's silicon getting broken. But the pitch lands as arithmetic, and security doesn't really work that way. As we've seen, bad entropy at setup meant none of the silicon even mattered. You could have 10 SEs in the CC and that wouldn't have saved you. But people ate that security theater up.

My mind keeps circling back to what we could have done differently. I keep landing on the same conclusion: we should have pushed back on the SE FUD much harder, and promoted Jade far more aggressively. We'd never have attacked CC, but we should never have taken the unwarranted flak for Jade's security model. The FUD steered people away from Jade. If we'd fought it, maybe more of them would have avoided the CC tragedy.

When we first launched the Jade, it sold for just $39.99. For that price you got such an incredible amount of value (at launch and later with subsequent updates).

➡️ Virtual secure element via blind oracle (@Blockstream's or self-hosted)
➡️ Can function as a stateless signing device (like SeedSigner)
➡️ Anti-Exfil protocol to protect against your seed being exfiltrated (Jade is one of only two HWWs that do this)
➡️ Genuine Check verification to prove the device is authentic and untampered with
➡️ Secure Boot ensuring only properly signed firmware runs
➡️ BIP39 passphrase and duress PIN
➡️ Air-gapped operations
➡️ Store Liquid assets like @tether USDT
➡️ Multisig support AND the ability to back up the multisig config (descriptors) for a setup involving ANY devices (or mixed hardware/software), as long as at least one Jade is part of the multisig - this makes multisig far less brittle since losing the config is catastrophic

The best part of all of this? You don't even need to BUY a Jade. You can build your own with almost any ESP32 board. Pair it with your own self-hosted blind oracle and you have a completely sovereign stack with no HWW vendor supply chain risk.

If you're looking for a new hardware wallet, take a serious look at @BlockstreamJade. It's built by a world-class team of engineers and cryptographers assembled by @adam3us. But don't take my word for it. The firmware is fully open source, so read it yourself.

Don't Trust. Verify.

https://t.co/h9dBaj4EwN

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed Has probado a usar Sparrow wallet? Me atrevería a decir que ahí no tendrás ese problem

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@GranMag0 No es lo único en lo que te equivocas

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed Por esta vez te lo dejamos pasar

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed Ni contestes, que ya acabo de ver la respuesta más abajo 🤣

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed Que opinas de que tangem no tenga pantalla para verificar?

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed Yo en vez de hacer pequeños envíos creo la passphrase y me anoto la máster fingerprint, salgo de esa cuenta y vuelvo a entrar con los datos que he anotado y verifico que la master fingerprint coincide.

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@goyohjBolsa No se pueden hackear las billeteras frías, eso que dices es una falacia. Si quieres te paso una dirección pública y derivas la semilla...

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@elonmusk Musk crater

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed @Ledger @P3b7_ A mí tampoco me gusta pero es tan sencillo como no usarla y punto, no? O esconde algún problema adicional?

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@PekicDaniel 🤣🤣🤣

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@IngenieroSeed Malditos porcentajes, juegan a favor de los incompetentes 🤣. Sigue tu plan, en cuanto los detectes bloqueo y a lo tuyo 😉

[Criptocrates @Cript0crates]

@PabloSabbatella Ten en cuenta que han tenido que analizar muchas direcciones derivadas de las semillas que han encontrado e ir probando a ver si tenían fondos. Y también que muchas semillas no valían para nada. Es un trabajo que aún automatizado lleva mucho tiempo