@Winnie_xplorer The disingenuous question is ambiguous but assumes you should provide a perfect answer. Not enough information is provided. I’m in the room. Am I included in the headcount of 120?
@BasedMikeLee@CynicalPublius Bullsh$t. You can continue to pontificate with meaningless excuses. You can’t even name the Republicans that said to drop it. As far as I’m concerned, you’re one of them.
@CoinTheorist@GuntherEagleman Prices are set in a competitive market. If an owner has his costs go down and decides to keep the extra money, then that’s fine. However, the owner across the street will lower his price and the guy that didn’t will lose the customer. That’s how market competition works.
What’s proprietary about an AI that locks you in? Whether Apple builds one or buys one or partners with one, will the user know or care? It’s easy already to ask Grok or Perplexity or any of the other AIs one question then ask a different Ai the next question. Perhaps Apple is in the driver seat because they control the interface that you’re holding in your hand
@RandPaul You’ve jumped the shark. You’re a typical politician. You now fit the category that we know you’re lying because your lips are moving. Border funding is trivial compared to the grift that you profit from. You’re a fraud.