![GlowSurfing's tweet photo. ANOTHER HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young ones (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS6yTvFXcAAH1dc.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Clifford Titus
@crtitusiii
Paladin of God Almighty.
Revenger for the Lord.
Herald of the Season of High Treason
Bringer of the Restoration
everywhere
Joined December 2016
287 Following
171 Followers
4.8K Posts
Pinned Tweet
High Treason is a Capital Offense.
Laws Contrary to Constitutional Law are forms of High Treason.
The Bill of Rights is Part of the Constitution. The Most Common and Highest Per Capita forms of High Treason are forms of "legislation" in controversy with the Bill of Rights.
...
https://t.co/GimRcocvAF
Up in Lake Havasu City tonight and I’m reminded of Katie Hobbs failing to protect our state’s water.
Hobbs lost 760K acre feet of water for Arizona, a huge failure of leadership.
We need someone who will stand up and protect Arizona’s resources.
I’m ready to do it.
...
https://t.co/zF9ENJMjuL
@katiehobbs She really thinks you’re stupid.
Katie vetoed No Tax on Tips and Overtime THREE TIMES this year.
She just lost 760K acre feet of water for Arizona.
Our state’s fentanyl death rate has spiked more than anywhere else this year.
She’s an absolute disaster.
...
https://t.co/9UzQhNZF58
INSANE: Meet Tis D'Ascoffon, a French woman who was subjected to sexual violence by a Muslim immigrant who stalked her to her apartment, locked her inside, and attempted to rape her.
Two years later, she gave an interview to French television, recounted the rape attempt, and stated that the main danger to women in Europe comes from "immigrants, black people, and Arabs."
Left-wing forces were outraged and filed a complaint against her for racism. She was charged, brought to trial, and several weeks ago a court in Paris found her guilty and fined her 1,000 euros for her words.
Read that again:
A woman who was subjected to sexual violence by an immigrant ends up in court years later for speaking the truth about sexual violence against women in Europe.
Europe is on a path to self-destruction.
The problem is that Those whom are zealously dedicated to Undermining the Supreme Law of the United States require outside insurgents under the guise of "refugees" to achieve this goal...
This is High Treason. It is becoming a High Frequency form of High Treason. Though it is not as High Frequency as the Unlawful Usurpation of the in-Alienable Rights of American Citizens.
https://t.co/5nJxmKh9iG
This is treasonous
Raising an army against those removing criminals from inside our borders
Appears to be positive moves...
https://t.co/8M2PTudPL8
“Biggs vowed to totally eliminate tax incentives for data centers, allow Arizona restaurants to serve raw milk, limit the number of short-term rentals that can be owned by investors, support more nuclear power in Arizona, and limit the use of food stamps to purchase “junk food” and soda.”
https://t.co/FAGT2XMAwK
The problem is that those whom deem themselves "law enforcement" have been demeaned into the position of being the Felony Accomplices of High Treason.
This is a political and economic issue. It's not that law enforcement needs to be defunded, it's that their training needs to be focused around Lawful behavior.
Many have Lobbied for the opposite.
This has nothing to do with ICE. Illegal immigrants are not citizens of the United States. It is a problem that has been pursued for generations before my own birth. Primarily to pursue Theft as a "safety and security" or "public welfare" issue.
...
https://t.co/jBEmgOUQMj
England's new school food rules ban the fried egg at breakfast and ration the sausage to twice a week, 120 years after the school dinner was invented because the boys were too small to fight.
The standards were published this month and take effect in September 2027 once Parliament nods them through in October. No deep frying, so fish and chips is gone. Sausages, nuggets, ham and anything in breadcrumbs limited to two portions a week between them. More wholegrain, more fibre, two portions of veg a day. At breakfast club, pastries and fried eggs are not permitted, chocolate spread, honey and syrup are banned, and low-sugar jam is allowed.
The state has been feeding schoolchildren since 1906, and it started for the army rather than for the children.
Britain went to war with the Boers in 1899 and could not find enough men. Across the country 38% of volunteers were rejected, for bad hearts, bad sight, bad hearing and rotten teeth, and that was after the army had dropped the minimum height to five feet. In Manchester four in ten were sent home. Ministers looked at the empire and then at the recruits and panicked.
In 1903 they appointed the Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration, and its 1904 report said what the teachers had been saying: the children were hungry, hungry children could not learn, and undersized children became undersized soldiers. It recommended free meals for the poorest. A Labour backbencher, William Wilson, got the Education (Provision of Meals) Act through in 1906 over the objections of the Lords.
Bradford ran the first proper trial in 1907. Breakfast and dinner for forty of the poorest children in the city, weighed and measured weekly: porridge with milk, bread and dripping, meat pies and stews. They gained weight in term and lost it in the holidays, and the city doctor wrote it up as proof. By 1914 there were 200,000 children on free meals, and the point of every one of them was a taller boy.
So the school dinner began as a programme for making the working class big enough to be useful, and its tools were milk, dripping and meat, because those were the things that made a child grow.
In 2027 the same state will take the fried egg off the same table, ration the sausage, and add fibre.
The state fed a century of children to make them bigger. The 2027 menu is the first one written to make them smaller.
Actual Assault and Actual Battery.
As opposed to the stupidities of politically motivated and greedy individuals in my own experiences...
https://t.co/dWuC99FP1b
🚨 BREAKING:
Three Black Women have been ARRESTED in the vicious lynch mob DRAGGING of a WHITE COLLEGE GIRL off her porch in YORK PA….
Police REFUSE to label the dozens of Black people assaulting a lone White College Girl - “not racially motivated” 😳
They also claim the injuries sustained & being KNOCKED UNCONSCIOUS- were not “serious bodily injuries” so they have not been charged with felony assault
ONLY SIMPLE ASSAULT MISDEMEANORS!!!! 😡
White Lives Matter 💪🏻
...
https://t.co/DMJPSqlgZn
The men guarding the King of England were fed so much beef that a visiting Italian duke assumed it was their job title.
Cosimo de' Medici came to London in 1669 and was shown the Yeomen of the Guard, and wrote home that a very large ration of beef was given to them daily at court, and that they might be called beef eaters. He thought he was being witty. The nickname had already been going a hundred years: a plotter confessing in 1571 refers to the Queen's bodyguard simply as the Beefs. By the 1600s foreigners were using beefeater for the English in general, in the way a man might now say pie eater about a town in Lancashire.
The ration survives. In the household accounts up to 1813, 30 men mounted guard at St James's each day, and the daily table for those 30, plus a messenger and a servant, was 24 lb of beef, 18 lb of mutton, 16 lb of veal, 2 lb of butter, 36 loaves and 27 gallons of beer, 28 in summer on account of the heat. Vegetables in sufficient proportions and the best in season, the clerk added, in the tone of a man listing the garnish.
Do the sum. 58 lb of meat between 32 mouths is not far off 2 lb each, every day, cooked in the royal kitchen and served in two sittings. On the King's birthday and whenever the guns fired the beef allowance alone went up to 216 lb.
They were chosen for size. That was the entire job specification of a royal bodyguard for 300 years: be the biggest man in the room and stand between the King and the door. And the Crown, which had every physician in England on call and access to whatever theory of diet it fancied, fed its biggest men on beef, mutton and veal by the stone, with butter, and did not vary this for 3 centuries.
The Tower warders inherited the name because they wore the same coat and the tourists could not tell them apart. They still wear it. It is on a bottle of gin.
The Crown never once fed its bodyguard a lentil, and it kept a written record of the fact, and the record says beef in the first column.
...
https://t.co/Dg6KRmd0F0
Seriously, at this point how does anyone still fall for feminism?
It has done nothing but destroy everything for women.
As a dad, I don't want my daughters growing up thinking being a woman the way God designed them is somehow a thing to be upset by.
A lot of modern feminism seems to tell women that marriage is a trap, motherhood holds you back, men are the problem, and the best way to be “strong” is to live like you don’t need anybody.
Nope.
I want my daughters to be smart, capable, confident, and able to stand on their own when they need to. But I also want them to know there is nothing weak about being feminine, loving your husband, raising children, making a home, or depending on a good man who loves and provides for his family.
And I want my sons to know there is nothing wrong with being masculine either. Be strong. Work hard. Protect your family. Provide. Keep your word. Control yourself. Put your wife and kids ahead of your own comfort.
Men and women are different. That’s not an insult. That’s how God made us.
My daughters don’t need feminism to tell them they have value. They already have value because they were made by God.
I’d rather teach them to love being women than spend their lives being told they need to be liberated from it.
...
https://t.co/KZaCXWjgdN
Why do people push so hard for diversity?
🤔🤔🤔
Is diversity really always a strength, or does it depend on what the team is actually trying to accomplish?
I think we sometimes make this idea far too simple.
A team isn't automatically strong because the people in it are different. A family isn't stronger because everyone thinks differently. A military unit doesn't become better because everyone has completely different priorities. A business team doesn't automatically succeed because its members come from different backgrounds.
Teams need something deeper than variety. They need trust. Shared standards. Competence. Discipline. A common mission.
Different perspectives can absolutely be valuable under certain circumstances. They can expose blind spots and bring information to the table that other people might miss. Research supports that in certain situations. But diversity also has the potential to create friction when people have conflicting assumptions, communication styles, or goals.
The benefits depend heavily on the task and on whether the group can actually work together.
That's worth remembering.
The goal shouldn't be to make every group as different as possible. The goal should be to build a group that can accomplish what it was created to accomplish.
Sometimes you need different perspectives.
Sometimes you need people who see the world differently.
But sometimes you need people who share the same values, understand the mission, trust each other, and are willing to pull in the same direction.
There's nothing wrong with recognizing that distinction.
If you were building a team for something that really mattered, would you care more about how different the members were, or whether they shared the character, competence, and commitment needed to succeed?
...
https://t.co/7MmoM0HqQT
And that’s not the only activist action she took. We don’t ask an AG to be a political activist, we elect them to enforce laws. Epic #fail. Elect @votewarren Petersen to clean up this mess.
...
https://t.co/Ya0zVpXiew
During the Spanish Civil War, Communists killed nuns then dug up their bodies and put them on public display for mockery, chopped off the hands of priests and murdered thousands priests, nuns and monks. They also burned down hundreds of churches.
@BGatesIsaPyscho Prepare for War with Those whom have Unlawfully Usurped your Rights.
...
https://t.co/n0d8oQzOVi
🚨 STARK WARNING FROM NORTH KOREAN DEFECTOR YEONMI PARK!
Yeonmi Park is sounding the alarm about American students embracing communism—while growing up with freedoms and opportunities she says people in North Korea never had.
She’ll be speaking at an anti-communism event hosted by Cornerstone University in Michigan alongside a survivor of Mao’s Cultural Revolution and Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon.
The event comes as Cornerstone’s president says he has become increasingly concerned about growing support for socialism among young Americans.
⚠️ Never take freedom for granted. Know history. Learn from those who lived under communist regimes.
#YeonmiPark #Communism #Socialism #Freedom #AmericanFreedom #Capitalism #KnowYourHistory #Christianity #CornerstoneUniversity #NorthKorea #Mao #PoliticalFreedom
...
https://t.co/0mO8ona7vy
A Secret Service agent who protected Trump recently said something that SHOCKED everyone: “Trump has RUINED me — I could never protect another President the same way again.” And before you assume he meant that as criticism, WAIT until you understand what he really meant by “ruined,” because his explanation of Trump has left people across the Secret Service deeply emotional.
Here’s what the agent meant by “Trump ruined me”:
This Secret Service agent had protected several Presidents before Trump. He was professionally trained, followed every rule, and performed his duty with discipline, distance, and dedication. He protected each President the same way — until he was assigned to Trump. That’s when EVERYTHING changed.
The agent explained:
“Trump RUINED me for this job. Not because he’s difficult — but because he’s completely different. Trump knows my NAME. Other Presidents called me ‘agent.’ Trump calls me by my actual name.
He knows my WIFE’S name. He knows my CHILDREN’S names. He asks about my son’s baseball games. Trump notices when I’ve been standing for 8 hours and tells me, ‘Sit down, you need to rest.’
During long days, Trump makes sure EXTRA food is available: ‘Make sure my guys eat first.’
When my FATHER passed away, Trump came to his funeral. No cameras. No reporters. No publicity. He simply came to honor the man who raised the person protecting him.
After being treated like THIS — how could I ever return to being just ‘agent’ to another President?
After Trump remembered my CHILDREN’S names, how could I protect someone who wouldn’t even bother learning mine?
After Trump treated me like FAMILY, how could I go back to feeling like FURNITURE?
Trump RUINED me.
He raised the standard so HIGH for how a President can treat the people protecting him that I could never accept the old standard again.
That’s what I mean when I say he ‘ruined’ me.”
Here’s what this confession supposedly shows: Trump didn’t simply have Secret Service agents protecting him — he made them feel VALUED, RESPECTED, and treated like FAMILY. Once someone experiences that kind of personal respect, it becomes impossible to accept being treated like nothing more than equipment.
@3Strands4now Quite insane...
Though that is slightly evident by the body language...
https://t.co/ICcOWaS158
ANOTHER HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young ones (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?
![GlowSurfing's tweet photo. ANOTHER HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young ones (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS6yTvOWUAEtMZb.jpg)
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Outdoor โชว์ควยน้ำแตก
kimi
Seen from Turkey
DOM LUVS 🖤❤️
Seen from Turkey
Yabancı Porno İzle - Yabancı Porno Seyret
Seen from Turkey
sgboys_fun
Seen from Singapore
افلام سكس عربي (رجل جنسي🔥)
Seen from Germany
chudai hijab
Seen from Indonesia
Rizky Billar
Seen from Malaysia
FTLX
Seen from United States
Doyan Tante 40+
Seen from Singapore
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.4M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.9M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers