Alchemy

I am a trader and technical analyst / Crypto trader Binance KOL

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

I received nearly $500 USD worth of $ROBO yesterday, thanks
But in new campaigns, it's hard to rank as they prioritize views over quality.

In most cases, the quality didn't matter, and quantity of views, likes, and comments mattered.
So people are using tricks to increase their reach, and it's not their mistake, as Binance itself said views will matter most.
They're just doing what they can to increase their rank higher, but why?
Why give priority to views instead of quality?

Frankly speaking, if you have high views and you wrote trash, completely AI, even irrelevant, you get up to 90 points.
But if you wrote very high-quality content, even without AI, what happens? You don't even get 8 to 10 points guaranteed.
But with the same content, if you have high views, you get up to 100 points.
And as I said, it's not people's mistake; they're just following the rules.

From Binance's perspective, why do people scroll on Binance Square to see paid partnerships?
If you ask and do a survey, you'll get an answer.
Almost everyone will disagree with it.
Only those who are participants themselves should see this content instead of others.
Infact I am tired my feed is 100% about campaigns contetn
And it'll only be possible if they prioritize quality over view count, likes, and comments.

Mostly, people are tired of doing this
. If you see that a user is ranked higher, it's mostly because of two cases: their reach is increased by Binance, or they're continuously involved in likes and comments on others' content to get likes and comments back.
In that case, the reach increases up to 50,000 views. But who watches this?
Mostly other people who aren't interested. Why are they forced to do this?

People are using tricks to get high views, and many are succeeding, but others have to watch this content forcefully.
This is happening because Binance itself proved that views will count.
It's three months now; they should prioritize quality so people won't use tricks to increase views, and no one else has to force themselves to watch this.
Those who were sharing high-quality content are not able to post good content, as they have to focus on increasing campaign-related content views.
Hence in trending articles and recommended content, I See paid partnerships everywhere, and most people are trying to be in trending so they get high points even if people are tired with doing these tricks.
Users who scroll on Binance want trade-related content, not paid partnership articles.
They minimize trading points to 5 regardless of trading volume only $10 matters so why not in views case only 5 points should matter so no one has to use tricks and they can actually focus on quality and post and other good content as well😊@binance. @FullTiltFrancis @BinanceHelpDesk @heyibinance @cz_binance @revolut20 #Binance

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@luckybb88 Seriously you got this as a gift 😍

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@momobsc_ Quiet inspiring

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@Usoppu what kind of airdrops ? and how you were so sure about that what is your criteria ?

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@BinancePk So you think we can't breathe while watching charts 😏

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@SujalJethwani But why they suspended your account ?
There is nothing wrong with your content.

[Binance Angels @BinanceAngels]

Learning Pills 💊 Ep.58

What is a market order? 📈

#LearningPills

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

Wanted to short $TAIKO earlier but dropped the idea after seeing 1.5 funding fee every hour
and dont want t o buy again after seeing $IN condition
recently I stucked badly in $RE because of funding fees
Re funding drop first time after almost 3 weeks today to 0.05 but thankfully I found a way to get out today.
we can't short easily because if coin is so volatile funding fee becomes a big hurdle...

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@bryan_johnson Its look delicious but when you have to cook yourself you will prefer to skip

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

$IN INFINIT is down 59% to $0.0613 in 24h, dramatically underperforming a slightly down broader market, primarily driven by a severe liquidity crisis and panic selling.
iquidity crisis and panic selling, evidenced by a 367.72% surge in trading volume to $214M against a thin $22.9M market cap.
No clear secondary driver was visible in the provided data; the move appears specific to INFINIT.

No specific news, exploit, or ecosystem catalyst for INFINIT was found in the provided data. The broader crypto market was only down about 1%, and Bitcoin fell 1.52%, making simple beta-following an insufficient explanation for a 44% drop.
Watch for: A sustained drop in volume alongside price stabilization, which would suggest selling pressure is exhausting.

[Yi He @heyibinance]

Thinking about the EU and crypto, I see some parallels to the largest players in emerging tech, such as Airbnb and Uber（Try asking the AI: In which countries have Uber and Airbnb been banned? ）Many global tech giants’ regulatory setbacks but came back stronger for it.
As for Binance and Europe, we take this market seriously. It's a small part of our business, but an important one, and we're committed to the EU and our customers there.
Building trust with regulators takes time—through engagement and better communication. We're committed to doing that work.
It is my expectation that Binance, and other crypto providers, will become the strongest gatekeepers of the financial system, far more than TradFi given the underlying technology and market forces driving adoption. We've made real strides in recent years and we're not slowing down.
We intend to get this right, and we are working hand in hand with EU and national regulators.

FUNDS ARE SAFU. https://t.co/NlVhsUO5Da

任何一个新兴行业在发展过程中，都会遇到不同程度的监管挑战和竞争挑战，就像Airbnb和Uber（试试问AI他们曾经被哪些国家禁止过？）但这不影响他们成为移动互联网时代最伟大的互联网公司。
Binance始终将遇到的问题视为提升我们团队能力和标准的机会。在过去几年，我们建立了行业用户资产透明度的标准，我们在合规上建立了行业的最高标准；对于欧盟地区的监管部门对于Binance建立有效的沟通与信任也许还需要时间，但我们不会放弃。并将继续遵循全球加密行业合规的黄金标准。
合规是近期大家非常关注的话题，我认为这是行业的进步，说明行业从草莽期逐渐转型开始自我约束与自律。但这次我得到的经验与教训是：拿到牌照的公司并不一定合规也不一定自律，而币安遵循黄金标准的合规也不一定能会拿到牌照，但我们的目标是星辰大海，不是和同行在泥坑打滚，我们会以行业的最高标准要求自己。

FUNDS ARE SAFU. https://t.co/NlVhsUO5Da

[Binance @binance]

Binance is excited to announce the OpenGradient (OPG) HODLer Airdrop – @OpenGradient $OPG.

The Airdrop page will be available on the Binance Airdrop Portal in 5 hours for users who subscribed their BNB to Simple Earn or On-Chain Yields.

👉 https://t.co/KKqtN6l1y5

[Binance @binance]

Everyone talks about safe crypto, few show the receipts. 🧾

Here's Binance's 👉
https://t.co/OXeoLn0YJp

[Alex Finn @AlexFinn]

Everyone on planet Earth is talking about local AI right now

And for good reason

Governments are banning models. Hardware prices are 10xing

You NEED to be getting into local AI. The number 1 questions everyone has though is which computer to buy?

Here's your answer:

You basically have 3 options:

1. MAC STUDIO (high memory, low bandwidth)-

Mac Studios are excellent devices for local AI. They can run MASSIVE models. I'm running GLM 5.2 right now on a single Mac Studio. The model is Opus 4.8 level

The issue is, Mac Studios have very low memory bandwidth. Meaning, the models run very slow

Mac Studios are a good choice for you if you want frontier level intelligence, but are fine running the intelligence passively

Meaning you get top intelligence, but it runs more in the background rather than on demand

As an example, I have GLM 5.2 running security checks on my codebase every hour. It creates a report. I review this later in the day

2. POWERHOUSE NVIDIA CHIPS (RTX 5090, 6000 Pro)

Nvidia is the most valuable company in the world, and for good reason

They make the world's best GPUs.

They have decent VRAM (32gb on the 5090, 96gb on the 6000 Pro) and INSANE bandwidth. Meaning the local models run at unbelievable speeds

I'm running Qwen 3.6 locally on a 5090 and it's just as fast as cloud models

I'd go this route if you want to run an AI agent like Hermes off a local model, still get decent intelligence, but have it able to work lightning fast

3. AI WORKSTATIONS (DGX Spark type computers)

The DGX Spark is an excellent AI computer

It has high memory (128gb unified memory) and has decent speeds because of the Nvidia CUDA architecture

It is basically the sweet spot between a cutting edge Nvidia chip and a Mac Studio

You can run medium sized models, and get usable speeds out of them

You're not going to get the same performance as cloud models, but it will allow you to offload small secondary tasks to your local models for them to handle

They are also the absolute easiest to get up and running

You plug it in, then tell your agent on your main computer to go onto it and set it up. You don't even need it connected to a monitor

CONCLUSION

Here's what it comes down to: how high intelligence do you need, what speeds do you need, and how plug and play do you want?

Want the highest speeds, like you are used to with cloud compute? Build a computer around an RTX 5090

Want to run frontier level intelligence, and don't mind slow speeds, go with a Mac Studio

Either way, it's never been more important to get into local AI

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@elonmusk Is there something wrong with the SpaceX IPO??

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@cz_binance Actually you are right same thing happens even in modern world 🌎

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@elonmusk Okay, maybe it was founded for all humanity, but people changed over time, just like you, and now you have your own Grok.
Better to focus on this.

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

@Gabbar8244 Yeh kab se unhealthy hogaya maana ke protein zyada nahi but galat kiya hai ?

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

You know, it's not surprising at all.

They used you to promote their project. Got your money. Got your credibility. Got your public endorsement.

And now? They don't need you anymore.

They freeze your tokens. Strip your voting rights. Threaten to burn everything you bought.

This is what they do. It's not shocking anymore.

Justin Sun put in $45 million. At one point, his holdings were valued over $1 billion . He believed in the project. He backed it publicly. He defended it.

And how did they repay him?

They froze his tokens. Changed the smart contract in the dark. Added a blacklist function without telling anyone .

One person now has the power to freeze any wallet. Any time. No reason needed.

That's not DeFi. That's a trap masquerading as a door.

The proposal on April 15th? The one that requires burning 10% of all adviser tokens? Sun couldn't even vote against it. His tokens were already frozen .

And now the threats. Burn his tokens worth hundreds of millions. Report him to authorities if he fights back .

Extortion. In plain sight.

Meanwhile, the project is bleeding. On the verge of collapse, the lawsuit says. Using its own token as collateral to borrow money . Paying up to 95% of proceeds to insiders .

The retail investors? The ones who believed? They're left holding bags.

This is the game. Top families. Big names. They build something, hype it up, take the money, and walk away.

Sun might get justice in court. Or he might learn an expensive lesson.

But here's the truth. They always do this. Always.

And we keep falling for it.

Not shocking at all.

[H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞 @justinsuntron]

Today, I filed a lawsuit in California federal court against World Liberty Financial to protect my legal rights as a holder of $WLFI tokens.

I have always been—and remain—an ardent supporter of President Trump and his Administration’s efforts to make America crypto friendly.  This lawsuit does not change how I feel about President Trump or the Trump Administration.

Unfortunately, certain individuals on the World Liberty project team have been operating the project in a manner that goes against President Trump’s values.  They wrongfully froze all of my tokens, stripped me of my right to vote on governance proposals, and have threatened to permanently destroy my tokens by “burning” them—all without any proper justification.  I do not believe President Trump would condone these actions if he knew about them.  

I have tried in good faith to resolve this situation with the World Liberty project team without resorting to litigation.  But the project team has refused my requests to unfreeze my tokens and restore my rights as a token holder.  They have left me with no choice but to turn to the courts. 

All I want is to be treated the same as every other early investor who received tokens—no better, no worse.

I also want the community to know that I strongly oppose the new governance proposal World Liberty published on April 15.  

If it passes, token holders who do not “affirmatively accept” its terms—including a requirement that 10% of all advisor tokens be permanently burned—will have their tokens locked indefinitely. 

For early purchaser tokens, the proposal imposes a two-year cliff followed by a two-year vesting schedule—and again, for those who do not affirmatively accept, their tokens are locked indefinitely.  

This proposal is bad for the community, but because World Liberty has frozen my early investor tokens, I cannot vote them for or against the proposal.

I believe in fairness, transparency, and the principles that make crypto powerful.  I will continue to fight for those principles. 🙏

[Alchemy @cryptoalchemy11]

You know it's not surprising.
They just use you to promote their project, and now they don't need you anymore.
They always do something; it's not shocking.
Whatever they are doing in the name of crypto for there own benefit despite they are top rich families accross the world.
I hope you will get justice or a good lesson.