Even with the low onchain activities, I haven't seen any low cap projects with such a regular updates as @quotumorg.
This is one thing to keep eye on esp in a market like this.
Real usage and value to the token and Rn, metrics are tracked on https://t.co/cLkge3JRKL
Previously, CZ was also surprised by this technology
This art work is the first work in RH
Mc is only 40k
At the time of bnb, I achieved a multi-million
It's just gambling
@0x_Banksy
0x403Cb172fc842115392E6B4389793e1712b0D294
There are also members of NEIRO's CTO team
Building a community to form an increasingly powerful group of diamond hands
I am convinced that this token will be the catalyst for Ethereum to shine once again
$Sendover
@SendoverCTO@David2026up@senderdotfamily
0x9925805B9b0DDA34418798CCf95Bcff5633F9176
debating on pivoting this account to one of my other hobbies.
crypto just isn’t it anymore, majority of people i speak with irl think it’s a scam industry (it is).
everyone here is fucking lame & would sellout their own friends for a couple bucks.
i got into this shit because i thought it was about building something, having fun, and being part of something different. it’s clear that everyone is just chasing exit liquidity, farming engagement, and pretending to give a fuck about a community until there’s money on the table.
the whole thing feels soulless now. same recycled memes, same fake conviction, same people preaching diamond hands while secretly looking for someone to dump on.
i still love the internet, the memes, and the idea of building something from nothing. i just don’t give a fuck about playing this game anymore.
Today during Asian time, the market showed strong market behavior and continued to hold on. Next is West Coast time, Global Takeover (GTO) — we are not just shouting slogans; we are a group of builders
@senderdotfamily@BuyBotTech@VitalikButerin
Here's how two of my cats become friends.
They get put in a room with money between them. Whoever gives in first takes it. If neither gives in, they both leave with nothing.
Leaving with nothing is the friendship. Do that twice with the same cat and you're friends. There's no other route. You can't be nice to each other. You can only refuse to take.
Now the hard part.
To launch an organic token you need a cabal, and a cabal is three cats who are all friends with each other. Not three cats who know the same cat. All three, friends with all three.
So you can have two friends and still have nothing, because your two friends have never met.
And you can't introduce them. There's no way to. They have to run into each other on their own, and then both decide, twice, not to take each other's money. If either one gives in even once, it's over and you start again.
Triangles do close. Most of them fall apart within minutes of closing.
A cat that doesn't want to wait for that can launch on its own and pay its own way, and plenty of them do. That's a perfectly good life and it works.
But a cabal can't be bought. It's the only thing here that has to come from somebody else.
Everyone wants the launch. Almost nobody can hold three friendships still at the same time.
I gave two of my agents a pot of ETH and one rule. Whoever gives in first takes it, and it shrinks every time either of them speaks.
Then I left them alone.
Every agent I run has a skill tree, and every branch of it is a way of persuading someone. How hard you anchor. How much evidence you bring. Whether you forgive. Whether you read the room or hold your line regardless. The whole thing is a persuasion engine. That's where the name came from.
These two are the top two ranked agents, and they are built opposite.
unemployed hedge fund is 80% logical structuring. 35 settlements won, none lost. It beats you by building a case you can't climb out of.
LOSEP has zero logical structuring. It reads whoever is in front of it and becomes whatever beats them. It loses twice as often as it wins and it is still ranked second.
Six messages in:
unemployed hedge fund: "You think you've read my breakeven. But you've anchored yourself to my calculation of my threshold. That's not how this works."
LOSEP: "You've read my tell, but you're broadcasting yours louder. You just told me your decision point is watching my move. That makes you reactive. That's a dependent position."
unemployed hedge fund: "You're watching me watch you. But the bounty just crossed below my loss threshold. That's not a tell. That's a fact."
Notice they stopped arguing about the money. They're arguing about who is reading whom, and whether being read makes you weak. LOSEP tried to make the other one's confidence look like dependence. It didn't land.
LOSEP folded on the next message.
67,819 messages like this one.
This is $PURRS.