@buildhomez To the point where the institutional capital needed to actually build these homes are reconsidering their appetite for development investment. Seattle is viewed in the same risk category as LA or Boston - not a good place to be.
@buildhomez The script has flipped and progressive politics has finally accepted that supply is important to affordability and are loosening land use policy, but are simultaneously doubling down on operating regulations.
@buildhomez Gotta keep the architects and land use attorneys employed. Shame this bill is getting so watered down - it (was) the best supply-side housing bill out there this year.
@buildhomez Yes - very much so. Eastside push towards lower AMI levels is a huge drag. Seattle MHA has its own issues. Well calibrated MFTE helps but 50% AMI is real deal killer.
@buildhomez Notice periods are challenging but larger management companies can work through this, just causes unnecessary friction. Fee regulation is only a concern if it attacks utility passthrough / bulk internet / tech fees. Job growth and rent control are primary risk.
@buildhomez This is biggest factor in institutional developers keeping Seattle on the sidelines of their capital allocation strategies. Backdoor rent control is existential threat that lingers even on minds given lack of state pre-emption.
@loganb@benmaritz Yep - it's a huge issue that has flown under the radar this session. Essentially a tax shift from homeowners to renters and office / industrial tenants. Bad policy that is getting worked by industry but we're swimming upstream this session against a number of bills.
@andyrandles @buildhomez Office of Housing sees the MFTE program as a handout to developers and don't understand the stimulatory effects to supply. 🤷🏼♂️
@benmaritz This has been on my mind but I have to imagine SPS factored this into their calculations, right? Surprised how tight to the chest they are keeping their data / assumptions.
@benmaritz@loganb @cmorr0w The fact that there is no centralized resource to post affordable apt vacancies is insane. Especially w/ Zillow in our backyard.
@benmaritz@loganb @cmorr0w Fully agree w/ this perspective, but given how many income limited apts exist, wish the city would focus on opportunities to reduce frictional vacancy. In our portfolio even if we can find residents that have a need, the paperwork + timeline to occupancy remains a major obstacle.
@pushtheneedle Sure, but cap rates (via interest rates) coupled w/ developer distress driving the bus here on "low" sale price. The property is hitting $5.00+ PSF rents.