Cstarkey88

This X account will be used for my commentary channel. And a little bit of my other channels. And Rumble.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@WarwasDr @DJBlack21x Why would he hide AI pictures?

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@HFazrl @DJBlack21x Exactly.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@Mitch1719676 I bet the judge was bias in each of those lawsuits. But it will be exposed eventually.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@Patriotism87543 Yes. This video shows George Floyd saying that he can't breathe moments before he was on the ground.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@pops30575819 I only heard that conspiracy theory during covid. Not recently. My stance is it wasn't as bad as the media said it was. The media made covid sound like the world's deadliest virus. If you got it you were going to die. But it had a high survival rate.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@firefang78 Aren't there billionaires that are on your side?

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@JerryWillResist Nobody said that he is.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@JamesTate121 What was a conspiracy theory during covid is now considered truth since COVID is over. For example masks. I don't know what conspiracy theory this is referring to but it wouldn't surprise me if it gets validated by new years.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

I asked Grok to fact check this post.

#CapitalOne #Trump #fyp

Mostly misleading / overstated.

The graphic in the post claims: “THE SITTING PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES GOT HIS ACCOUNTS CLOSED FOR MONEY LAUNDERING AND ITS BARELY NEWS.”

Here is a breakdown of the key elements based on the underlying events:

Sitting president**: Accurate in the present tense. As of August 2026, Donald Trump is the sitting U.S. president (in his second term). The account closures themselves occurred in 2021, when he was a private citizen and former president.

Accounts closed**: Partially accurate. Capital One closed more than 300 accounts affiliated with the Trump Organization (Trump’s family business and related entities), including some linked to Eric Trump, after notifying the parties in March 2021. Reports often describe these as Trump or Trump Organization accounts.

“For money laundering”**: Overstated and imprecise.
Capital One stated in a late July 2026 court filing (in response to a 2025 lawsuit by Trump-related entities alleging political “debanking”) that the closures resulted from “months of analysis and a careful review by Capital One’s AML [anti-money laundering] team in accordance with bank policies and regulatory guidance.” The bank flagged certain “transaction patterns” that matched types of activity noted in federal banking guidance as potential money-laundering risks.

Critically, Capital One has never accused the Trump Organization (or Trump) of actually engaging in illegal money laundering. No regulator has alleged wrongdoing in connection with these closures. Banks routinely exit high-risk relationships as a compliance and risk-management step under AML rules without proving a crime occurred.

“Barely news”**: Subjective. The bank’s disclosure (made public via the court filing around July 31–August 1, 2026) has been covered by multiple major outlets, including AP, Reuters, ABC News, CNN, Bloomberg, The Guardian, and others in early August 2026. Coverage volume and prominence can always be debated, but it is not accurate to describe the story as essentially unreported.

Bottom line: There is a factual core—Capital One closed hundreds of Trump Organization-linked accounts in 2021 after an internal AML review flagged certain transaction patterns—but the graphic significantly overstates it by saying the accounts were closed “for money laundering” (implying proven wrongdoing) and by framing a 2021 business-account action as if it directly involved the current sitting president in that capacity. The bank’s stated reason was risk/compliance-based AML concerns, not a finding of money laundering.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@NotAvgLiberal Well, he wasn't lying.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

I'll never leave your pizza burning.

#rollingstones #beastofburden #funny #virałpost #misheardlyrics

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

I asked Grok to tell me what the fallacies are in this meme.

#Trump #MAGA #fypシ゚viral

The main fallacies in this meme are absolutism (black-and-white thinking), argument from personal incredulity, and abusive ad hominem.

The meme asserts that Donald Trump has zero good qualities, no redeeming traits, and nothing admirable—framed as the result of sincere effort to “find the good in people.” This is not a careful evaluation of evidence; it is an extreme, totalizing claim.

Absolutism / false dichotomy / black-and-white thinking**: It treats character as binary (either purely good or utterly without merit). Real people almost always have mixed traits. Even strong critics of Trump can point to specific positives (e.g., certain negotiation styles, media mastery, or policy outcomes some supporters value) without endorsing him overall. Declaring “nothing at all” collapses any nuance into an all-or-nothing judgment that is nearly impossible to defend rigorously.

Argument from personal incredulity (or argument from ignorance)**: The reasoning reduces to “I was taught to look for good things and still can’t find any → therefore none exist.” Failure to perceive positives is treated as proof of their absence. This confuses the speaker’s subjective search (or confirmation bias) with an exhaustive, objective inventory of the person’s record, actions, or character.

Abusive ad hominem**: The meme attacks Trump’s entire character in sweeping terms rather than engaging specific claims, policies, statements, or behaviors with evidence. It substitutes total moral condemnation for argument. While criticism of character can sometimes be relevant, pure “he has no redeeming qualities whatsoever” functions more as invective than analysis.

The meme is primarily an expression of strong personal dislike dressed as a universal conclusion. It offers no examples, counter-evidence consideration, or criteria for what would count as a “redeeming quality.” As rhetoric it is effective at signaling in-group contempt; as logic it collapses under its own absolute language. Subjective opinions about public figures are common, but presenting “I can’t find any good → there is none” as airtight reasoning is fallacious.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@michaelt5656 Apparently, you didn't try very hard.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@edmunburg93849 @MrImranPk Yes. The screenshots of Grok's response prove it.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

I asked Grok to tell me what the fallacies are in this meme.

#TrumpEpstein #virałpost #viralㅤㅤ

The meme commits several classic logical fallacies. Its core claim is: “If Trump were not a pedophile, he would sue for slander/libel; he is not suing; therefore he is a pedophile (because discovery would prove the accusation true).”

1. False dichotomy / false premise
The argument treats “sues for defamation” as the only possible response of an innocent person. It ignores many other legitimate reasons someone might choose not to sue, even if the claim is false:
Defamation suits by public figures are extremely difficult to win under U.S. law (New York Times v. Sullivan requires proof of “actual malice”).
Lawsuits are expensive, time-consuming, and often generate more publicity for the original accusation.
Strategic, political, or personal reasons can outweigh any desire to litigate.
Many people simply ignore baseless claims rather than amplify them.

Because the opening premise is false or wildly incomplete, the entire chain collapses.

2. Argument from ignorance (appeal to ignorance)
The meme treats the absence of a lawsuit as positive evidence of guilt. Lack of legal action does not prove the underlying claim is true; it is simply the absence of one particular response.

3. Circular reasoning / begging the question
The second half asserts that discovery “would prove it true.” This assumes the very conclusion it is trying to reach (that the accusation is true). It does not independently establish that discovery would produce such proof; it merely asserts it.

4. Affirming a non-sequitur conclusion
Even if one accepted the (false) premise that an innocent person must sue, the leap to “therefore he is a pedophile” still does not follow. Non-action is being treated as decisive proof of a specific, serious crime rather than as ambiguous silence.

In short, the meme relies on an unsupported conditional, treats silence as guilt, and smuggles its conclusion into one of its premises. These are textbook informal fallacies.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@tommyboy0690 And if Trump is a pedophile, the Obama or Biden administration should have released the Epstein files when they had access to it. You're already claiming that his name was redacted so nothing will prove his innocence to you. Confirmation bias.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@RossKneeDeep We have until 2028 for most of this. I'm interpretating no news wars to mean no wars lasting for years. It's unrealistic to take that literal.8 and 9 were proposals, not promises. It takes time. especially if a federal judge keeps blocking you.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@Peg33 This says nothing about Trump.

[Cstarkey88 @cstarkey88]

@bling_momma What are you getting at?