The BBC has issued an official explanation on why it has failed to cover our rape gang inquiry.
'Complex choices' are made for editorial and practical reasons.
These choices 'should not be taken as indicative of bias.'
Their words.
But the BBC were very quick to cover malicious complaints against our inquiry, in an attempt to smear our efforts? They were then forced to later apologise about how they covered the story.
So either the inquiry is worth reporting on, or it's not.
They can't pick and choose.
We're told 'complex choices' are made, meaning that efforts to uncover the industrial rape of young girls is not near the top of list.
Let's take a look at a few stories on the main BBC news page, right now...
'Osaka pays 'love and respect to Japan' in Wimbledon kimono'
'Why £15 durians are being sold at half price - or given away for free'
'We had packed lunches every day for 10 years and retired at 40'
Are these stories more important than the rape gang inquiry?
I think not.
You cannot hate the BBC enough.
I expect no fair coverage from them, I've stopped expecting it.
But the BBC is funded by the British people.
Their continued suppression of our inquiry is a disgrace.
@lee_spicer1@DailyMirror Are you still trying to convince yourself?
bless you 🤣
So, this Sian Astley candidate 🤣
Why is Fauxrage so bad at picking people?
I think he needs to have a little rest, just like Dr. David Bull advised.
https://t.co/REYoBLzpq3
My comment has now been added in The Telegraph hit piece.
I’m sure they wrote this kicking & screaming:
“The mass deportation of third-world migrants is not extreme; becoming a minority in the country of your ancestors is extreme.
“I am advocating for a return to normality; none of this is normal.”
@JackElsom I'm sure that is what he rushed off to do, I mean why waste time on questions from the press when you could spend that time coming up with a plan? 🤣🍿
You only get one chance....
....to make a first impression.
Burnham just blew his.
There's no disagreement that...
Whitehall is broken.
Power is too centralised.
The regions have been neglected.
Skills and technical education matter.
Growth can’t just mean London doing better.
But when all of that is YOUR responsibility
you can't just tell us the 'problems'...
We already know what they are.
You need to present the solutions,
do it convincingly and answer
the difficult questions....
Andy Burnham did none of that.
He blew it and then scurried away....
Andy Burnham wants to be Prime Minister but he won’t answer questions.
He’s terrified of being exposed.
If you want somebody who has a plan and will answer questions, you can come to me.
A future Restore Britain government would pursue the full development of our offshore oil and gas reserves, the rapid expansion of nuclear energy, the exploitation of onshore shale where viable, and if able to compete some limited role for renewables within a balanced grid.
Our overriding objective is to deliver power at prices affordable to British households and competitive for British industry.
Restoring Britain’s energy security will not be without transitional challenges, but the alternative is continued adherence to policies that have produced some of Europe’s highest energy prices.
A patriotic energy policy must place the interests of the British people first.
That is what a Restore Britain Government will deliver.
@BBCPropaganda But the neoliberalism was needed to convince people that it is capitalism that is the problem and not the socialism in the fabianism.
But Andy Burnham's real problem is the one that has forever plagued him. He has shot his load too soon and lost all momentum
@ArchRose90 Socialism is not Democracy as you understand it
(they re-branded Socialism as Democracy and Democracy as Populism)
Socialism: Vote it in, shoot it out.
They will do everything to avoid Populism
Thank Reform for the 2024 vote split 🤦