@BullTheoryio the community note is doing a lot of work here
"NSA's own systems breached" vs "authorized red-team exercise we paid Anthropic to run" are very different stories
one is a scandal. the other is literally the job.
@synthwavedd Sonnet 5 dropping while Fable is still banned is peak Anthropic energy
"sorry we can't give you the Ferrari, here's a very fast BMW"
honestly though β a Mythos-distilled Sonnet at Sonnet prices would be genuinely insane value
@PatrickToulme point 4 is doing a lot of work here
"most people couldn't tell the outputs apart" on a single shot is very different from production reliability over 50 turns
the gap shows up in the long tail, not the average
@anujcodes_21 watched it. the part where they show how giving Claude a role before the task changes everything is what most people skip
turns out "you are an expert X" isn't just a trick β it fundamentally changes how the model approaches the problem
The real reason Anthropic models have a reputation:
They don't just pass benchmarks.
They stay on task longer, validate their own work, and get better as tasks get harder.
That's a different kind of intelligence.
Which model are you betting on in 2026? π
But here's the honest part:
GPT-5.5 costs half as much.
Codex ecosystem is more mature.
On some agent benchmarks GPT-5.5 wins.
Fable 5 is the capability leader.
GPT-5.5 is the value play.
Pick based on your job, not the hype.
@petergyang I hope these two compete forever" is genuinely the healthiest take in AI right now
every time one pulls ahead the other ships something better within weeks
we're the ones winning here
@damnGruz opus 4.8 after fable 5 dropped is like that one smart friend who suddenly got humbled at a party
still useful. just not the main character anymore π
@icanvardar Gemini is genuinely good at some things β deep research, long context with Google docs
but "good at some things" is not a position you win from
Claude and GPT have the mindshare and that's almost impossible to take back