The khachey

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Sana__Kaleem Dit account dat vanuit Nederland opereert, bevordert haat. Mail Twitter alstublieft om de geolocatie van de eigenaar teachterhalen en hem tevervolgenop grond van artikel 137c,artikel 137d en 137e,en hem te deporteren voordater een diplomatiekecrisis plaatsvindt. @Politie @Het_OM

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Sana__Kaleem @angeelallah @KSAMOFA @PvGovSa @security_gov @MojKsa @Saudi_Moia @SAUDICERT Paki dawg, when I reply to an account, that account admin is either arrested or prosecuted or worse things has happened for blasphemous account which posts from android phones like yours.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@clashreport "For now".

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@21Lonley @yl2vv استمتع بكونك عبداً لليهود، وليلقَ أمثالك الذل والهوان في الدنيا والآخرة.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@21Lonley @yl2vv أيها الخائن! إن كوني حماراً لشرفٌ لي أعظم من كوني عبداً لليهودي.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Sana__Kaleem @angeelallah @KSAMOFA @PvGovSa @security_gov @MojKsa @Saudi_Moia @SAUDICERT Eff off paki dawg.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Soureh_design2 Looks like the Qataris forgot the economic blockade by the Saudis.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Jvnior There was no Saudi Arabia during the time of Imam Ali r.a. It was created in 1932 by the protestant Brits.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@marimhkim9 ألايوجدمسلمفيالمملكةالعربيةالسعوديةيتصدىلهذالحسابالذييُدار من داخل المملكة؟إنهذا "الكلب"ينشرمحتوىًيسيءللإسلام، ومع ذلك لم يُسجنأو يُعاقبعقاباًصارماً بعد.
@KSAMOFA @PvGovSa @security_gov @MojKsa @Saudi_Moia @SAUDICERT راسل "تويتر" للحصول على عنوان IP والموقع الجغرافي، وعاقبه بشدة.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Velo518950 ألا يوجد مسلم في المملكة العربية السعودية يتصدى لهذا الحساب الذي يُدار من داخل المملكة؟ إن هذا "الكلب" ينشر محتوىً يسيء للإسلام، ومع ذلك لم يُسجن أو يُعاقب عقاباً صارماً بعد.
@KSAMOFA
@PvGovSa @security_gov @MojKsa @Saudi_Moia
@SAUDICERT

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@moiegy https://t.co/FwUqY4RjRd يا لها من جرأة أن يمارس هذا الحساب نشاطه انطلاقاً من دولة مسلمة هي مصر، وأن يُقدم على تدنيس القرآن الكريم! لقد استخدم هذا ال��خص جهاز كمبيوتر يسهل تتبعه؛ لذا يجب العثور عليه ومعاقبته بشدة قبل أن تندلع اضطرابات كبيرة في البلاد. @AlAzhar @AlsisiOfficial

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@moiegy https://t.co/hCdYHEipq5
يقوم هذا الحساب الموثق -المرتبط برقم هاتف مسجل والذي يُدار من مصر- بنشر محتوى يسيء للإسلام ويدنّس القرآن الكريم؛ لذا يرجى مراسلة "تويتر" للحصول على الموقع الجغرافي للمسؤول عن الحساب ومعاقبته.
@AlsisiOfficial
@alimamaltayeb

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@god_of_porn666 إرسال رسالة واحدة إلى تويتر للحصول على بيانات الجهاز والموقع الجغرافي لصاحب الحساب. هذا الحساب من سوريا يجب ملاحقته ومعاقبته بشدة لنشره محتوى يسيء للإسلام ويتدنس القرآن الكريم.
@Anas_Khattab_sy
@CivilAffairsSy
@SyPresidency
@syrianmoi

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@Aamn_ksa https://t.co/O2EeqKvNCV
ألا يوجد مسلم في المملكة العربية السعودية يتصدى لهذا الحساب الذي يُدار من داخل المملكة؟ إن هذا "الكلب" ينشر محتوىً يسيء للإسلام، ومع ذلك لم يُسجن أو يُعاقب عقاباً صارماً بعد.
@KSAMOFA @PvGovSa @security_gov @MojKsa
@Saudi_Moia @SAUDICERT

[Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 @cirnosad]

The ☢️ Missile Strike at the Pentagon on 9/11 /🧵

What really struck the WTC on 9/11? We've already eliminated airplanes as an option, which is a shock to anyone who lived through that day. We now have video evidence of not inserted planes in all footage of 9/11, but also the removal of another object. What the hell was that that "ball" like object?

Could it also be a composite? A deeper fake, so to speak? Is there any clue that could possible eliminate all other options? It's a ridiculous thought but, given what we experienced, we shouldn't make any assumptions and only work with what is real, provable and observable.

The real challenge of answering such a question is that the two world trade centres turned to dust, destroying the scene of the crime and most of the evidence with it. But we aren't out of luck, as another building was struck on 9/11:

The Pentagon.

Though there was obviously no wreckage of an aircraft on the scene, there is enough evidence in the Pentagon for us to determine not only what couldn't have struck it, but the only object in the world that could have struck it and left the damage that it did.

Unlike the strikes on the WTC, there was no televised composite film of a plane striking the pentagon, simply because the scenario required was physically impossible. The plane supposedly banked to achieve cruise speed at ground level and struck the Pentagon parallel to the ground. There is a very slow and low quality surveillance video that depicts this strike (which we will examine shortly). Yet, just from the satellite photos of the Pentagon, we can determine the actual damage.

So, let's examine three pieces of evidence based on things that are already established and known! With these pieces of evidence we will determine what struck the Pentagon and how it's related to whatever struck the WTCs and the larger plot around 9/11!

A. Penetration Depth
================
Let's do some math based on established observations. This is going to be necessary to other objects out, though it will be overkill for a plane.

The object that struck the Pentagon struck three of its five rings:
The E-Ring, the D-Ring and finally C-Ring when it stopped. The exterior wall of the pentagon consisted of ~13 centimetres of limestone and ~20 cm of bricks. Inside the Pentagon, each wall consisted of 25 cm of brick. The distance travelled to the end of ring C is 64 meters total. Given the 6 walls penetrated, at the perpendicular, that is a total of:

* 64 meters travelled after impact.
* 130mm of limestone
* 1580mm of bricks
* Six impact impulses

Even though the individual walls are not very thick or strong, that's a huge amount of material to eat through and that's at 90 degrees. And a very long distance from the first site of impact. If you measure the two visible impact zones, you will see that the object struck the Pentagon at an angle of 70 degrees to the plane. That means we have to divide the above by sin 70deg:

- 68 meters travelled
- 138mm of limestone
- 1680mm of bricks

The object was clearly on its way to the courtyard centre of the Pentagon and whoever planned this trajectory was attempting to penetrate the building as deeply as possible without targeting anything specific within it. Incidentally, the courtyard centre of the Pentagon was (and still is) called ground zero, a name it earnt during the Cold War under the assumption that the USSR would strike exactly that location during mutually assured destruction. There is even a hotdog stand in the middle of the Pentagon affectionately called cafe ground zero for this reason.

B. Pattern of Destruction
================
Despite being struck with this object, the Pentagon outer wall did not immediately collapse. In fact, close ups show very localised destructions, albeit very strong fires. 20 minutes later, the outer wall of the Pentagon collapsed.

Another important observation was impact shape it left: it was that of a single hole that destroyed a brick pattern around ~2 meters wide. This was evidence even in the C-ring. Keep this important observation in mind.

C. The Timeline
================
Let's place the attack on the Pentagon with all the events surrounding it:

8:46:30 AM - WTC North Tower is struck.
9:03:00 AM - WTC South Tower is struck.
9:37:46 AM - Pentagon is struck.
9:55:?? AM - First responders told to evacuate Pentagon perimeter.
9:57:?? AM - Pentagon outer wall "collapses".
9:58:59 AM - South Tower pulverised.
10:03:11 AM - Object destroyed over Pennsylvania.
10:28:22 AM - North Tower pulverised.

================
This is actually all the evidence we need from the Pentagon itself so let's dive deeper into the implications that every detail left behind.

/1

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@clashreport Dismantle the @UN

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@ragipsoylu Ungrateful basterds.

[The khachey @cvbafdg]

@jacksonhinkle The Persians will tame him.