@TheSecretDoc@Xeon4f145d96s1 Strikes are there to improve the working conditions (including pay) after negotiations have failed, with the point being if you don't then people leave. Locuming during strikes directly undermines that action. Moving to a different country if anything strengthens the point.
@CryptoChase02 Had LOs placed there but then decided it was too far away so cancelled it and allocated it to trades which were closer at the time....bad idea
@melovemoney1 The funny bit is this narrative that daily trading volume has gone from $20-30mil to $200-800+mil all because of a $17 airdrop...https://t.co/MftZWauVPH
@nursebro01@InvCoriolis@Xeon4f145d96s1 The level of risk and clinical knowledge required is nowhere near the same level, so obviously one is more acceptable than the other for ANPs. If ANPs didn't exist then they would just be done by the resident doctors in addition to their other roles.
@bananatransit@AlexJDeighton Yes, but that is due to the on call burden, so you're working more hours (particularly unsocial hours). It's like saying your salary is £150k if you take an extra job and work every shift possible for the next year. You compare like for like. Basic salary to basic salary.
@scrivvyfloor@Xeon4f145d96s1 The incentive is the cost. With the new bill passed, strike mandates will last longer and be easier to achieve. If the next ballot passes then the government is in a difficult position. At the end of the day, the responsibility for the healthcare system falls on them.
@stevohaddo@Dr_Done_ Plus if you locum at every possible opportunity and never have a free weekend for that year then you can get to £150-200k. You compare basic salary to basic salary, banding is irrelevant.
@Shiwon_NZ_Ao@MedRegoncall1@anaesthetic_spr When so many different people have supposedly misinterpreted your post, maybe the problem isn't their reading comprehension but your writing ability?