#ThinBlueLine #PoliceLivesMatter

Loving life.

[#ThinBlueLine #PoliceLivesMatter @cybermark94]

I'm gonna say it now. This deal WILL fall apart, just like every deal since the 1960s. The simple fact is hamas want to destroy #Israele Mooslums will lie to you face to achieve their objectives. Hamas will never accept a two state solution.

https://t.co/2pu1cNZ8YJ

[Lee Harris @LeeHarris]

SUPERB! Trevor Phillip's BEAUTIFULLY exposes David Lammy and Labour's sickening hypocrisy.

He shows him the receipts of them ALL saying it's ok to feel "fury" and "anger" over George Floyd, while they criticise Farage for saying the same about Henry Nowak.

Satisfying to watch.

[Christian Concern @CConcern]

🚨(1)BREAKING: Christian community police officer wins settlement after being forced out of his role for questioning and criticising Islam during diversity training.

Luke Salmons, who has been supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was suspended for six months, forced to resign and put on a police barring list after he had questioned radical Islam in a training session.

He had been told that the session was a 'safe place' for discussion, but after expressing his beliefs, the consequences were devastating.

After taking legal action, his case has now been settled on confidential terms, however his story raises serious concerns about free speech and religious freedom in UK policing.

See more in this thread 🧵on our website and breaking in the media:
https://t.co/Ed9elAMIKa

https://t.co/sAkxcVf9PW

[Robbie @Robbie_Reasons]

The Somerset Farmhouse of 1 North Street, Williton were approached by a "food influencer" that wanted to charge them £2,000 for a review.

They put out a video of Sally eating a sausage roll instead 😆.

Lets make Sally and the Somerset Farmhouse famous for free.

[Carl Wilkinson @Wilbaforce12]

People may not remember this, but in June 2020 Keir Starmer wrote to Boris Johnson about the death of George Floyd and the protests that followed.

In that letter, he did not speak about anger as if it were automatically dangerous. He said he felt “shock and anger” himself. He said black citizens in Britain felt “palpable anger and anxiety.” He said George Floyd’s death had “justifiably prompted anger” and a “burning desire for fundamental change.”

He also spoke about the “fundamental democratic right to peaceful protest,” the need for a “peaceful and proportionate response,” and Britain’s “moral obligation” to understand the values being defended.

So Starmer knows how to do this when he wants to.

He knows how to place anger in context. He knows how to distinguish protest from disorder. He knows how to speak about democratic rights, moral grievance, proportionality, and the need to understand frustration.

Yet in the Henry case, that entire vocabulary seems to vanish.

No “justifiably prompted anger.”
No “palpable anger and anxiety.”
No “burning desire for fundamental change.”
No attempt to understand what has produced the rage.

Just “full force of the law.”

This is what people notice. The state can interpret one form of anger as a moral and political signal, while treating another as nothing more than disorder. It can find language for grievance when the cause is fashionable, but reaches immediately for punishment when the anger comes from people it already despises.

No one serious is saying violence should be excused. But people are entitled to ask why anger is humanised in one case and criminalised in another.

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

Ed Davey has written to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson demanding she WITHDRAW official EHRC guidance protecting female-only spaces in toilets and changing rooms.

Let that land.

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission — a statutory body — has produced legally grounded guidance telling employers and public bodies that biological men should not access women’s single-sex spaces.

This is not opinion.
This is not politics.
This is the settled legal position following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on the meaning of “woman” under the Equality Act.

And Ed Davey wants it gone.

His stated reason?

The guidance is not “compatible with long-standing British values.”

British values.

He used those words to argue AGAINST protecting women’s single-sex spaces.

The same Liberal Democrats who lecture the country about tolerance, inclusion and human rights are now lobbying a Labour minister to tear up statutory guidance that protects every woman in Britain who walks into a changing room, a refuge or a hospital ward.

This is not a fringe position within the Lib Dems.

Their leader wrote the letter.

The party has chosen its side.

It is not the side of women.

Repost if you think women’s single-sex spaces should be protected.

[#ThinBlueLine #PoliceLivesMatter @cybermark94]

@theSNP Where is the money coming from? Does it get paid back?

[Frances Lumsden @FrancesLumsden]

I don’t give a monkeys what party she represents; she speaks the truth. And other MSPs laugh. Shame on them. The woman of Scotland agree with every single word.

[#ThinBlueLine #PoliceLivesMatter @cybermark94]

@theSNP So what? It changes NOTHING. The matter remains reserved to #Westminster. #StillNaw

[𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺U𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻 @TeamUnion_UK]

British Patriot Dame Arlene Foster tells John Swinney, leader of the failing SNP, who has cosied upto Sinn Féin, that it's "difficult to move on from sinn fein's dark past when they refuse to move on from their dark past" by "continuing to glorify their terrorism".

"To forget the dead, would be akin to killing them a second time"

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

Sarah Pochin puts it to Parliament;

"Why are some protesters being fast-tracked through the courts, while grooming gang survivors are left waiting decades for justice?

This betrayal is just another example of two-tier justice system"

[Rakesh Krishnan Simha @ByRakeshSimha]

Meet Dr Keith Wolverton, a genial British GP working in urgent care. During a consultation at a walk-in centre in Staffordshire, he asked a Muslim woman to remove her niqab because he had difficulty hearing her explain her young daughter’s symptoms. He cited issues with her English and the need to see her mouth movements for clear communication and proper diagnosis. She initially refused on religious grounds but eventually complied.

After her daughter received treatment and recovered, the thankless woman filed a complained that she felt “victimised and racially discriminated against.”

CONSEQUENCES: A Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service hearing found the doctor guilty of misconduct. He was initially suspended for 9 months. In 2026, Dr Wolverton was struck off the medical register (effectively sacked/banned from practising). All because he was concerned about the health of a child.

[Maxi @AllForProgress_]

You might have heard of Maggie Oliver.

She's a former Greater Manchester detective who, in 2012, was ordered to abandon her investigation into the systematic rape of children in Rochdale, and decided she would rather resign her warrant card rather than do so.

Maggie, as that would imply, is one of the good ones. I constantly ask how our police can consider themselves worthy of the badge if they are not willing to return the badge rather than commit injustice in its name. Maggie did just that; she was asked to cover for criminals, so she told the shirts to stuff themselves and handed back her commission.

She won a small but consequential victory in the High Court on Friday. Mr Justice Kimblin granted her foundation a full judicial review of whether the British state has actually done anything about the recommendations it accepted, in 2022, at the end of a seven-year inquiry into the institutional cover-up of decades of child sexual abuse.

Maggie Oliver is one woman. She has no political party behind her and no standing in Whitehall. She has no peerage, no chambers, no billionaire foundation footing her bills.

She was ordered, by senior officers, to drop her investigation into a network of men who were raping children in industrial quantities in her city, because of the demographics to which those men belong made the whole thing a bit awkward.

Fourteen years on, she has done what nobody else in this country has been able to. She has hauled the British state into open court to answer for the choice it made, over four years and under two governments, to hold a seven-year, £200 million inquiry into the institutional cover-up of child abuse and implement, deliberately, none of that inquiry's recommendations.

The Home Office accepted those recommendations in 2022. So did the Department for Education, the police inspectorates and the Crown Prosecution Service. And then nothing happened. The recommendations sat. The departments restructured. Ministers rotated.

The girls and women who had given evidence aged. More such operations continued around the country, while the men who had run the previous set of them either walked free, left the country, or drew their own pensions.

The state, in the manner of every institution Tony Blair ever built, had decided that the writing of the report was the action, and the doing of the report could be handed off to history.

That is what Maggie Oliver has now forced into court. And the political class knows what that means. The Home Secretary has not commented. The Prime Minister has not commented. The candidates jockeying through the post-Starmer Labour succession have, at the time of writing, failed even to speak her name, as though they know that, if they do, lightning will flash in the sky and they'll be turned into a pillar of Tesco's-own-brand dishwasher salt.

They are silent because they recognise, accurately, that the answers a judicial review will produce - to the question of why their inquiry's findings were treated as ornamental - will, should, must end the careers of every official who was supposed to act on them and did not. That councillors and councils, mayors, indeed entire political parties, will be caught under ultraviolet light and shown for their guilt.

It's time a government did what the British state has spent twenty years declining to do. Take on institutional failure.

Name the institutions that failed, in public, on the record. Name the officers and officials who covered it up, and the officers and officials who pressed for the cover-up too. Prosecute them under the standards that any other employee of a public organisation defrauding the public would expect to face.

The recommendations the inquiry produced must be implemented in full, alongside whatever further measures a second look at the evidence then demands.

There will not be another inquiry into the inquiries. There will be the verdicts.

Maggie Oliver is one of the bravest people in Britain. She has earned, by her own resignation and by fourteen years and a foundation and a court case carried on her back, the right to expect from a future British government the simple thing that ought to have happened in 2014, in 2016, in 2018, in 2022 and in every other year of this national disgrace.

She has not yet been given it; we have not yet been given it. But it will be given, and soon.

[Adrian Hilton @Adrian_Hilton]

I don't know what school this is, but unless the headteacher has invited a Reform UK politician (and others) to rebut this disinformation and to give a balancing view, this electioneering is a blatant contravention of Part V, Chapter IV, Sections 406-7 of the Education Act 1996.

[redpillbot @redpillb0t]

Historian Bill Federer:

“They say that by 2030, there will be a majority Muslim population in Europe, and they'll just flat out vote in Sharia law. It won't just be no go zones where they take over entire neighborhoods in Paris or around Belgium and London. No, they'll take over entire cities.

And people forget, Egypt was completely Christian for six centuries. It's not anymore.

All of North Africa was completely Christian for six centuries. It's not anymore. All of Turkey, all seven churches as mentioned in the book of Revelation, were all in Turkey. And they were all taken over by the Muslim Turks.

Constantinople was the largest Christian city in the world, and the largest Christian church in the world for hundreds of years was the Hagia Sophia. And it got turned into a mosque.

And so they want to do the same thing with the Vatican. And recently they allowed Muslim prayers in the Vatican. So we see that it's headed in that direction.“

[🐝Bee @BloodyPolitics]

Currently trending on X a video which probably still gives SNP First Minister @johnswinney nightmares and rightly so. I hope this week's election gives him and his very sinister Scottish Government the order of the boot. #SNPout

[Don Keith @RealDonKeith]

🚨A Muslim openly declares in the UK that Sharia law should replace British law because it’s far superior.

This is no longer hidden.

Mass migration has imported parallel legal systems that reject Western values entirely.

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

BAN PRO INTIFADA PROTESTS

Here @KemiBadenoch is baited by the @BBC into trying to have our march banned.

Kemi sees straight through their agenda, so fair play to her for that.

We have never glorified terrorism or jihadists.

We have never called for violence.

We don't sympathise with Hamas.

We don't shout 'from the river to the sea'.

We don't hate Jews.

We love our country and our people.

Our Unite The Kingdom events are not comparable, not even slightly.

Better luck next time BBC you filthy dirty smear merchants.

We call for peace and unity, the pro Palestinian, far left and Islamic revolutionaries call for the exact opposite.

We are not the same.

See you all in London on the 16th of May.

Make your stand.

#UniteTheKingdom #UTK

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

British MP Nick Timothy has exposed shocking corruption inside the British police — and it’s even worse than anyone imagined.

[Liza Rosen @LizaRosen0000]

In 2014, while Hamas terrorists fired thousands of rockets at Jewish civilians, including kindergartens, Shabana Mahmood, the current UK Home Secretary, stood on stage and openly supported them.

She called the rocket-firing Gazans “her brothers and sisters.” She didn’t condemn the Islamic terrorism or call for peace. Instead, she outlined a strategic plan: use Muslims who had immigrated to the West (like her own parents) as an economic weapon against Israel by organizing boycotts of Jewish-made products to financially weaken the Jewish state.

She bragged publicly about being part of a riot squad that shut down London stores for five hours until they removed Jewish-made products from Israel.

This was never about justice. It was about partnering with genocidal terrorists to help Hamas slaughter more Jews.

Shabana Mahmood actively worked to advance Hamas’s genocidal agenda so Muslim terrorists could annihilate Israel and its Jewish population.

Today, this same woman is the UK Home Secretary, responsible for the safety of British Jews.

Let that sink in. The Muslim woman who sided with Hamas against Israel and plotted to weaken it economically is now in charge of protecting Jewish communities in Britain.

This is not just absurd. This is dangerous.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Myth: "I only wear vegan fabrics. Better for the animals, better for the planet."

Let's check in on Doris's annual contribution.

Once a year, in late spring, Doris is sheared. The procedure takes approximately three minutes. Doris does not enjoy it. Doris does not, by any visible measure, suffer from it. Doris is, immediately afterwards, a noticeably more comfortable animal in the British summer.

The fleece weighs approximately 3 kilograms. It is sold to the British Wool Marketing Board for, depending on the year, between £0.40 and £2.50 per kilogram. The shearing costs more than the wool fetches. Brian is shearing Doris at a loss.

The wool is then:
- Naturally flame-retardant
- Naturally antibacterial
- Moisture-wicking
- Biodegradable
- Renewable, annually
- Carbon-storing while in use

The replacement, in performance fabrics:
- Polyester
- Polyamide
- Acrylic
- Polypropylene
- All petroleum-derived
- All shedding microplastics on every wash
- All requiring fossil fuel inputs to produce
- All non-biodegradable, with a typical landfill lifespan of 200-500 years

A single wash of a polyester fleece can release up to 700,000 microplastic fibres into the water system. These fibres are now in: every tested water source on earth, every tested human placenta, every tested rainfall sample, the deep ocean, the Arctic ice, and the lungs of marine mammals.

A single wash of a wool jumper releases: nothing. The wool, when eventually disposed of, returns to soil within a few years.

The fabric being marketed as the "ethical" alternative to wool is plastic.

The plastic is "ethical" because nobody has been asked to slaughter the polymer.

The polymer also has not been asked.

Doris, by being a sheep on a fell, is producing the most thoroughly sustainable performance fabric humans have ever made.

Brian is selling it at a loss.

The fashion industry, meanwhile, is selling petroleum at a profit and calling it ethical.

Reject plastic. Wear wool.

Doris is, this morning, growing next year's batch.